Extending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologies

Abstract Background While enrichment of terminologies can be achieved in different ways, filling gaps in the IS-A hierarchy backbone of a terminology appears especially promising. To avoid difficult manual inspection, we started a research program in 2014, investigating terminology densities, where...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vipina K. Keloth, James Geller, Yan Chen, Julia Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-12-01
Series:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01290-z
_version_ 1818601275149778944
author Vipina K. Keloth
James Geller
Yan Chen
Julia Xu
author_facet Vipina K. Keloth
James Geller
Yan Chen
Julia Xu
author_sort Vipina K. Keloth
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background While enrichment of terminologies can be achieved in different ways, filling gaps in the IS-A hierarchy backbone of a terminology appears especially promising. To avoid difficult manual inspection, we started a research program in 2014, investigating terminology densities, where the comparison of terminologies leads to the algorithmic discovery of potentially missing concepts in a target terminology. While candidate concepts have to be approved for import by an expert, the human effort is greatly reduced by algorithmic generation of candidates. In previous studies, a single source terminology was used with one target terminology. Methods In this paper, we are extending the algorithmic detection of “candidate concepts for import” from one source terminology to two source terminologies used in tandem. We show that the combination of two source terminologies relative to one target terminology leads to the discovery of candidate concepts for import that could not be found with the same “reliability” when comparing one source terminology alone to the target terminology. We investigate which triples of UMLS terminologies can be gainfully used for the described purpose and how many candidate concepts can be found for each individual triple of terminologies. Results The analysis revealed a specific configuration of concepts, overlapping two source and one target terminology, for which we coined the name “fire ladder” pattern. The three terminologies in this pattern are tied together by a kind of “transitivity.” We provide a quantitative analysis of the discovered fire ladder patterns and we report on the inter-rater agreement concerning the decision of importing candidate concepts from source terminologies into the target terminology. We algorithmically identified 55 instances of the fire ladder pattern and two domain experts agreed on import for 39 instances. In total, 48 concepts were approved by at least one expert. In addition, 105 import candidate concepts from a single source terminology into the target terminology were also detected, as a “beneficial side-effect” of this method, increasing the cardinality of the result. Conclusion We showed that pairs of biomedical source terminologies can be transitively chained to suggest possible imports of concepts into a target terminology.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T12:48:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b93daefee97f4a3a8d1041e4fe7ccb1c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6947
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T12:48:47Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-b93daefee97f4a3a8d1041e4fe7ccb1c2022-12-21T22:31:13ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472020-12-0120S1011110.1186/s12911-020-01290-zExtending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologiesVipina K. Keloth0James Geller1Yan Chen2Julia Xu3Department of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Computer Information Systems, Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New YorkJXU ConsultingAbstract Background While enrichment of terminologies can be achieved in different ways, filling gaps in the IS-A hierarchy backbone of a terminology appears especially promising. To avoid difficult manual inspection, we started a research program in 2014, investigating terminology densities, where the comparison of terminologies leads to the algorithmic discovery of potentially missing concepts in a target terminology. While candidate concepts have to be approved for import by an expert, the human effort is greatly reduced by algorithmic generation of candidates. In previous studies, a single source terminology was used with one target terminology. Methods In this paper, we are extending the algorithmic detection of “candidate concepts for import” from one source terminology to two source terminologies used in tandem. We show that the combination of two source terminologies relative to one target terminology leads to the discovery of candidate concepts for import that could not be found with the same “reliability” when comparing one source terminology alone to the target terminology. We investigate which triples of UMLS terminologies can be gainfully used for the described purpose and how many candidate concepts can be found for each individual triple of terminologies. Results The analysis revealed a specific configuration of concepts, overlapping two source and one target terminology, for which we coined the name “fire ladder” pattern. The three terminologies in this pattern are tied together by a kind of “transitivity.” We provide a quantitative analysis of the discovered fire ladder patterns and we report on the inter-rater agreement concerning the decision of importing candidate concepts from source terminologies into the target terminology. We algorithmically identified 55 instances of the fire ladder pattern and two domain experts agreed on import for 39 instances. In total, 48 concepts were approved by at least one expert. In addition, 105 import candidate concepts from a single source terminology into the target terminology were also detected, as a “beneficial side-effect” of this method, increasing the cardinality of the result. Conclusion We showed that pairs of biomedical source terminologies can be transitively chained to suggest possible imports of concepts into a target terminology.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01290-zTerminologiesUMLSConcept importSNOMED CTNational cancer institute thesaurusDensity differences
spellingShingle Vipina K. Keloth
James Geller
Yan Chen
Julia Xu
Extending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologies
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Terminologies
UMLS
Concept import
SNOMED CT
National cancer institute thesaurus
Density differences
title Extending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologies
title_full Extending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologies
title_fullStr Extending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologies
title_full_unstemmed Extending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologies
title_short Extending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologies
title_sort extending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologies
topic Terminologies
UMLS
Concept import
SNOMED CT
National cancer institute thesaurus
Density differences
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01290-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vipinakkeloth extendingimportdetectionalgorithmsforconceptimportfromtwotothreebiomedicalterminologies
AT jamesgeller extendingimportdetectionalgorithmsforconceptimportfromtwotothreebiomedicalterminologies
AT yanchen extendingimportdetectionalgorithmsforconceptimportfromtwotothreebiomedicalterminologies
AT juliaxu extendingimportdetectionalgorithmsforconceptimportfromtwotothreebiomedicalterminologies