Saliva as a Viable and Simple Alternative to Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

Introduction: Attributable to the difficulties in specimen collection, discomfort and symptoms caused on by Nasopharyngeal (NPS) and Oropharyngeal Swab (OPS) collection, and significant risk to Healthcare Workers (HCW), evaluation of an alternative specimen for the diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leimapokpam Sumitra Devi, Mukesh Sharma, Moumita Sardar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2023-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/17502/59884_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(JY_SHU_OM)_PFA(SHU)_PB(JY_SHU)_PN(SHU).pdf
_version_ 1797870473331081216
author Leimapokpam Sumitra Devi
Mukesh Sharma
Moumita Sardar
author_facet Leimapokpam Sumitra Devi
Mukesh Sharma
Moumita Sardar
author_sort Leimapokpam Sumitra Devi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Attributable to the difficulties in specimen collection, discomfort and symptoms caused on by Nasopharyngeal (NPS) and Oropharyngeal Swab (OPS) collection, and significant risk to Healthcare Workers (HCW), evaluation of an alternative specimen for the diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is required. Saliva specimen could be an alternative specimen with many advantages over NPS and OPS, however little is known about how well it performs this purpose. Aim: The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy of saliva as a viable and simple alternative specimen to NPS and OPS for COVID-19 Real-Time reverse transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR). Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, SGT Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Haryana, India, from July 2020 to December 2020. A total of 60 symptomatic and 20 asymptomatic COVID-19 patients were recruited for the study and specimen viz., saliva, NPS and OPS were collected at four different sampling points i.e., on day 1, 5, 7 and 14 after confirmation of COVID-19 rRT-PCR test positivity. Data obtained from the study was analysed and expressed as median, frequency, interquartile range and Chi-square test was done for comparison of categorical variables. Results: Majority of the patients in symptomatic hospitalised COVID-19 patients were males (n=49, 81.7%) and remaining were females (n=11, 18.3%) and in asymptomatic group 8 (40%) were males and 12 (60%) were females. Saliva was the most sensitive specimen (74.2%), followed by NPS, Naso Oropharyngeal Swab (NOPS) with 70.8% each and OPS (65.8%) for detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in symptomatic patients at four different sampling points. Comparable findings were also observed in specimens obtained from asymptomatic individuals as well. In addition, the viral load was also highest in saliva sample, as measured by Cycle Threshold (CT)-value. Across all specimen types, high viral load (lower CT-values) was observed during the early period of infection. Majority of the study participants reported discomfort during NPS and OPS collection (90% and 85%, respectively), lacrimation, sneezing and gag reflex being the most commonly reported induced symptoms. Conclusion: In the present study, saliva could be a viable and alternate specimen for COVID-19 diagnosis due to its ease in sample collection, specimen stability and reduced risk of transmission of infection due to droplets.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T00:28:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b940375ee17349ed97f581c2f88ee0e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T00:28:01Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-b940375ee17349ed97f581c2f88ee0e12023-03-15T06:12:40ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2023-02-01172DC11DC1510.7860/JCDR/2023/59884.17502Saliva as a Viable and Simple Alternative to Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionLeimapokpam Sumitra Devi0Mukesh Sharma1Moumita Sardar2Tutor, Department of Microbiology, SGT Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India.Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, SGT Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India.Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, SGT Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India.Introduction: Attributable to the difficulties in specimen collection, discomfort and symptoms caused on by Nasopharyngeal (NPS) and Oropharyngeal Swab (OPS) collection, and significant risk to Healthcare Workers (HCW), evaluation of an alternative specimen for the diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is required. Saliva specimen could be an alternative specimen with many advantages over NPS and OPS, however little is known about how well it performs this purpose. Aim: The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy of saliva as a viable and simple alternative specimen to NPS and OPS for COVID-19 Real-Time reverse transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR). Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, SGT Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Haryana, India, from July 2020 to December 2020. A total of 60 symptomatic and 20 asymptomatic COVID-19 patients were recruited for the study and specimen viz., saliva, NPS and OPS were collected at four different sampling points i.e., on day 1, 5, 7 and 14 after confirmation of COVID-19 rRT-PCR test positivity. Data obtained from the study was analysed and expressed as median, frequency, interquartile range and Chi-square test was done for comparison of categorical variables. Results: Majority of the patients in symptomatic hospitalised COVID-19 patients were males (n=49, 81.7%) and remaining were females (n=11, 18.3%) and in asymptomatic group 8 (40%) were males and 12 (60%) were females. Saliva was the most sensitive specimen (74.2%), followed by NPS, Naso Oropharyngeal Swab (NOPS) with 70.8% each and OPS (65.8%) for detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in symptomatic patients at four different sampling points. Comparable findings were also observed in specimens obtained from asymptomatic individuals as well. In addition, the viral load was also highest in saliva sample, as measured by Cycle Threshold (CT)-value. Across all specimen types, high viral load (lower CT-values) was observed during the early period of infection. Majority of the study participants reported discomfort during NPS and OPS collection (90% and 85%, respectively), lacrimation, sneezing and gag reflex being the most commonly reported induced symptoms. Conclusion: In the present study, saliva could be a viable and alternate specimen for COVID-19 diagnosis due to its ease in sample collection, specimen stability and reduced risk of transmission of infection due to droplets.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/17502/59884_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(JY_SHU_OM)_PFA(SHU)_PB(JY_SHU)_PN(SHU).pdfcoronavirus disease 2019cycle threshold valuediagnostic specimen
spellingShingle Leimapokpam Sumitra Devi
Mukesh Sharma
Moumita Sardar
Saliva as a Viable and Simple Alternative to Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
coronavirus disease 2019
cycle threshold value
diagnostic specimen
title Saliva as a Viable and Simple Alternative to Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
title_full Saliva as a Viable and Simple Alternative to Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
title_fullStr Saliva as a Viable and Simple Alternative to Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
title_full_unstemmed Saliva as a Viable and Simple Alternative to Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
title_short Saliva as a Viable and Simple Alternative to Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
title_sort saliva as a viable and simple alternative to nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for covid 19 real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
topic coronavirus disease 2019
cycle threshold value
diagnostic specimen
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/17502/59884_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(JY_SHU_OM)_PFA(SHU)_PB(JY_SHU)_PN(SHU).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT leimapokpamsumitradevi salivaasaviableandsimplealternativetonasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforcovid19realtimereversetranscriptasepolymerasechainreaction
AT mukeshsharma salivaasaviableandsimplealternativetonasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforcovid19realtimereversetranscriptasepolymerasechainreaction
AT moumitasardar salivaasaviableandsimplealternativetonasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforcovid19realtimereversetranscriptasepolymerasechainreaction