Studies on A. Einstein. B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” III: Illustrative examples and applications

In the preceding Papers I and II of this series, we have presented a review and upgrade of basic mathematical, physical and chemical methods, and provided a confirmation of the apparent proof of the EPR argument [1] that extended particles within physical media (interior dynamical problems) admit cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ruggero Maria Santilli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Accademia Piceno Aprutina dei Velati 2020-06-01
Series:Ratio Mathematica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eiris.it/ojs/index.php/ratiomathematica/article/view/518
_version_ 1818693245819944960
author Ruggero Maria Santilli
author_facet Ruggero Maria Santilli
author_sort Ruggero Maria Santilli
collection DOAJ
description In the preceding Papers I and II of this series, we have presented a review and upgrade of basic mathematical, physical and chemical methods, and provided a confirmation of the apparent proof of the EPR argument [1] that extended particles within physical media (interior dynamical problems) admit classical counterparts [9], while Einstein’s determinism appears to be progressively verified with the increase of the density of the medium [10]. In this third and final paper of the series, we shown that the EPT argument in general, and Einstein’s determinism in particular, appear to be progressively verified in the structure of mesons, baryon, nuclei, and molecular bonds while being fully verified at the limit of gravitational collapse. We additionally show, apparently for the first time, the validity of the EPR final statement to the effect that the wavefunction [of quantum mechanics] does not provide a complete description of the physical reality” since the covering isowavefunctions of hadronic mechanics provide an otherwise impossible representation of all characteristics of various physical and chemical interior systems existing in nature.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T13:10:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b9434d535f6b4838bfb59ae392e1cad4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1592-7415
2282-8214
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T13:10:37Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Accademia Piceno Aprutina dei Velati
record_format Article
series Ratio Mathematica
spelling doaj.art-b9434d535f6b4838bfb59ae392e1cad42022-12-21T21:47:08ZengAccademia Piceno Aprutina dei VelatiRatio Mathematica1592-74152282-82142020-06-0138013922210.23755/rm.v38i0.518463Studies on A. Einstein. B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” III: Illustrative examples and applicationsRuggero Maria Santilli0Institute for Basic Research, Palm Harbor, FL 34683 U.S.A., research@i-b-r.orgIn the preceding Papers I and II of this series, we have presented a review and upgrade of basic mathematical, physical and chemical methods, and provided a confirmation of the apparent proof of the EPR argument [1] that extended particles within physical media (interior dynamical problems) admit classical counterparts [9], while Einstein’s determinism appears to be progressively verified with the increase of the density of the medium [10]. In this third and final paper of the series, we shown that the EPT argument in general, and Einstein’s determinism in particular, appear to be progressively verified in the structure of mesons, baryon, nuclei, and molecular bonds while being fully verified at the limit of gravitational collapse. We additionally show, apparently for the first time, the validity of the EPR final statement to the effect that the wavefunction [of quantum mechanics] does not provide a complete description of the physical reality” since the covering isowavefunctions of hadronic mechanics provide an otherwise impossible representation of all characteristics of various physical and chemical interior systems existing in nature.http://eiris.it/ojs/index.php/ratiomathematica/article/view/518epr argument, isomathematics, isomechanics.
spellingShingle Ruggero Maria Santilli
Studies on A. Einstein. B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” III: Illustrative examples and applications
Ratio Mathematica
epr argument, isomathematics, isomechanics.
title Studies on A. Einstein. B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” III: Illustrative examples and applications
title_full Studies on A. Einstein. B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” III: Illustrative examples and applications
title_fullStr Studies on A. Einstein. B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” III: Illustrative examples and applications
title_full_unstemmed Studies on A. Einstein. B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” III: Illustrative examples and applications
title_short Studies on A. Einstein. B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” III: Illustrative examples and applications
title_sort studies on a einstein b podolsky and n rosen argument that quantum mechanics is not a complete theory iii illustrative examples and applications
topic epr argument, isomathematics, isomechanics.
url http://eiris.it/ojs/index.php/ratiomathematica/article/view/518
work_keys_str_mv AT ruggeromariasantilli studiesonaeinsteinbpodolskyandnrosenargumentthatquantummechanicsisnotacompletetheoryiiiillustrativeexamplesandapplications