Forms of Freedom in Pablo Larraín’s No and Neruda

For nearly forty years, freedom in Latin American literature has been tied to liberal democracy and state-sponsored terror. Literature, according to this post-dictatorial project, eliminates the division between art and life on behalf of democratic freedom and against human rights violations. What t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eugenio Di Stefano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2018-10-01
Series:Open Library of Humanities
Online Access:https://olh.openlibhums.org/article/id/4517/
_version_ 1818333163614633984
author Eugenio Di Stefano
author_facet Eugenio Di Stefano
author_sort Eugenio Di Stefano
collection DOAJ
description For nearly forty years, freedom in Latin American literature has been tied to liberal democracy and state-sponsored terror. Literature, according to this post-dictatorial project, eliminates the division between art and life on behalf of democratic freedom and against human rights violations. What this project ignores is that the dictatorships’ objective was to eliminate all resistance to the market. Or as Eduardo Galeano notes, “People were in prison so that prices could be free.” This essay suggests that Pablo Larraín’s No (2012) and Neruda (2016) begin to challenge the conception of freedom in relation to democracy and dictatorship by insisting that democracy and dictatorship be understood instead in relation to the market. That is, the true force of these two films is found in their insistence on aesthetic form, or what Larraín calls an “illusion,” an illusion that not only rejects the indistinction between art and commodities, but also gestures toward a space of freedom beyond neoliberalism.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T13:47:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b9542ec9eba946d1aadcbf17d07f5826
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-6700
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T13:47:16Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Open Library of Humanities
record_format Article
series Open Library of Humanities
spelling doaj.art-b9542ec9eba946d1aadcbf17d07f58262022-12-21T23:43:21ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesOpen Library of Humanities2056-67002018-10-014210.16995/olh.361Forms of Freedom in Pablo Larraín’s No and NerudaEugenio Di Stefano0 For nearly forty years, freedom in Latin American literature has been tied to liberal democracy and state-sponsored terror. Literature, according to this post-dictatorial project, eliminates the division between art and life on behalf of democratic freedom and against human rights violations. What this project ignores is that the dictatorships’ objective was to eliminate all resistance to the market. Or as Eduardo Galeano notes, “People were in prison so that prices could be free.” This essay suggests that Pablo Larraín’s No (2012) and Neruda (2016) begin to challenge the conception of freedom in relation to democracy and dictatorship by insisting that democracy and dictatorship be understood instead in relation to the market. That is, the true force of these two films is found in their insistence on aesthetic form, or what Larraín calls an “illusion,” an illusion that not only rejects the indistinction between art and commodities, but also gestures toward a space of freedom beyond neoliberalism.https://olh.openlibhums.org/article/id/4517/
spellingShingle Eugenio Di Stefano
Forms of Freedom in Pablo Larraín’s No and Neruda
Open Library of Humanities
title Forms of Freedom in Pablo Larraín’s No and Neruda
title_full Forms of Freedom in Pablo Larraín’s No and Neruda
title_fullStr Forms of Freedom in Pablo Larraín’s No and Neruda
title_full_unstemmed Forms of Freedom in Pablo Larraín’s No and Neruda
title_short Forms of Freedom in Pablo Larraín’s No and Neruda
title_sort forms of freedom in pablo larrain s no and neruda
url https://olh.openlibhums.org/article/id/4517/
work_keys_str_mv AT eugeniodistefano formsoffreedominpablolarrainsnoandneruda