Complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidance

Abstract Background Tobacco smoking is extremely prevalent in people with severe mental illness (SMI) and has been recognised as the main contributor to widening health inequalities in this population. Historically, smoking has been deeply entrenched in the culture of mental health settings in the U...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa Huddlestone, Harpreet Sohal, Claire Paul, Elena Ratschen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3320-6
_version_ 1819034822806339584
author Lisa Huddlestone
Harpreet Sohal
Claire Paul
Elena Ratschen
author_facet Lisa Huddlestone
Harpreet Sohal
Claire Paul
Elena Ratschen
author_sort Lisa Huddlestone
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Tobacco smoking is extremely prevalent in people with severe mental illness (SMI) and has been recognised as the main contributor to widening health inequalities in this population. Historically, smoking has been deeply entrenched in the culture of mental health settings in the UK, and until recently, smokefree policies tended to be only partially implemented. However, recent national guidance and the government’s tobacco control plan now call for the implementation of complete smokefree policies. Many mental health Trusts across the UK are currently in the process of implementing the new guidance, but little is known about the impact of and experience with policy implementation. Methods This paper reports findings from a mixed-methods evaluation of policy implementation across 12 wards in a large mental health Trust in England. Quantitative data were collected and compared before and after implementation of NICE guidance PH48 and referred to 1) identification and treatment of tobacco dependence, 2) smoking-related incident reporting, and 3) prescribing of psychotropic medication. A qualitative exploration of the experience of inpatients was also carried out. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed, and the feasibility of collecting relevant and complete data for each quantitative component was assessed. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic framework analysis. Results Following implementation of the complete smokefree policy, increases in the numbers of patients offered smoking cessation advice (72% compared to 38%) were identified. While incident reports demonstrated a decrease in challenging behaviour during the post-PH48 period (6% compared to 23%), incidents relating to the concealment of smoking materials increased (10% compared to 2%). Patients reported encouraging changes in smoking behaviour and motivation to maintain change after discharge. However, implementation issues challenging full policy implementation, including covert facilitation of smoking by staff, were reported, and difficulties in collecting relevant and complete data for comprehensive evaluation purposes identified. Conclusions Overall, the implementation of complete smokefree policies in mental health settings may currently be undermined by partial support. Strategies to enhance support and the establishment of suitable data collection pathways to monitor progress are required.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T07:39:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b95693606fc54163a1e20da5d3c30503
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T07:39:51Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-b95693606fc54163a1e20da5d3c305032022-12-21T19:11:21ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632018-07-0118111210.1186/s12913-018-3320-6Complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidanceLisa Huddlestone0Harpreet Sohal1Claire Paul2Elena Ratschen3Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, City HospitalDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, City HospitalLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Becklin CentreDepartment of Health and Social Sciences, University of YorkAbstract Background Tobacco smoking is extremely prevalent in people with severe mental illness (SMI) and has been recognised as the main contributor to widening health inequalities in this population. Historically, smoking has been deeply entrenched in the culture of mental health settings in the UK, and until recently, smokefree policies tended to be only partially implemented. However, recent national guidance and the government’s tobacco control plan now call for the implementation of complete smokefree policies. Many mental health Trusts across the UK are currently in the process of implementing the new guidance, but little is known about the impact of and experience with policy implementation. Methods This paper reports findings from a mixed-methods evaluation of policy implementation across 12 wards in a large mental health Trust in England. Quantitative data were collected and compared before and after implementation of NICE guidance PH48 and referred to 1) identification and treatment of tobacco dependence, 2) smoking-related incident reporting, and 3) prescribing of psychotropic medication. A qualitative exploration of the experience of inpatients was also carried out. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed, and the feasibility of collecting relevant and complete data for each quantitative component was assessed. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic framework analysis. Results Following implementation of the complete smokefree policy, increases in the numbers of patients offered smoking cessation advice (72% compared to 38%) were identified. While incident reports demonstrated a decrease in challenging behaviour during the post-PH48 period (6% compared to 23%), incidents relating to the concealment of smoking materials increased (10% compared to 2%). Patients reported encouraging changes in smoking behaviour and motivation to maintain change after discharge. However, implementation issues challenging full policy implementation, including covert facilitation of smoking by staff, were reported, and difficulties in collecting relevant and complete data for comprehensive evaluation purposes identified. Conclusions Overall, the implementation of complete smokefree policies in mental health settings may currently be undermined by partial support. Strategies to enhance support and the establishment of suitable data collection pathways to monitor progress are required.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3320-6Tobacco controlSmokefree policiesMental healthHealth inequalities
spellingShingle Lisa Huddlestone
Harpreet Sohal
Claire Paul
Elena Ratschen
Complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidance
BMC Health Services Research
Tobacco control
Smokefree policies
Mental health
Health inequalities
title Complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidance
title_full Complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidance
title_fullStr Complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidance
title_full_unstemmed Complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidance
title_short Complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidance
title_sort complete smokefree policies in mental health inpatient settings results from a mixed methods evaluation before and after implementing national guidance
topic Tobacco control
Smokefree policies
Mental health
Health inequalities
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3320-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lisahuddlestone completesmokefreepoliciesinmentalhealthinpatientsettingsresultsfromamixedmethodsevaluationbeforeandafterimplementingnationalguidance
AT harpreetsohal completesmokefreepoliciesinmentalhealthinpatientsettingsresultsfromamixedmethodsevaluationbeforeandafterimplementingnationalguidance
AT clairepaul completesmokefreepoliciesinmentalhealthinpatientsettingsresultsfromamixedmethodsevaluationbeforeandafterimplementingnationalguidance
AT elenaratschen completesmokefreepoliciesinmentalhealthinpatientsettingsresultsfromamixedmethodsevaluationbeforeandafterimplementingnationalguidance