Sampling fossil floras for the study of insect herbivory: how many leaves is enough?
<p>Despite the great importance of plant–insect interactions to the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, many temporal gaps exist in our knowledge of insect herbivory in deep time. Subsampling of fossil leaves, and subsequent extrapolation of results to the entire flora from which they came,...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2020-02-01
|
| Series: | Fossil Record |
| Online Access: | https://www.foss-rec.net/23/15/2020/fr-23-15-2020.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797370242593193984 |
|---|---|
| author | S. R. Schachat S. R. Schachat S. A. Maccracken S. A. Maccracken C. C. Labandeira C. C. Labandeira C. C. Labandeira |
| author_facet | S. R. Schachat S. R. Schachat S. A. Maccracken S. A. Maccracken C. C. Labandeira C. C. Labandeira C. C. Labandeira |
| author_sort | S. R. Schachat |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Despite the great importance of plant–insect interactions to the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, many temporal gaps exist in our knowledge of insect herbivory in deep time. Subsampling of fossil leaves, and subsequent extrapolation of results to the entire flora from which they came, is practiced inconsistently and according to inconsistent, often arbitrary criteria. Here we compare herbivory data from three exhaustively sampled fossil floras to establish guidelines for subsampling in future studies. The impact of various subsampling routines is evaluated for three of the most common metrics of insect herbivory: damage type diversity, nonmetric multidimensional scaling, and the herbivory index. The findings presented here suggest that a minimum fragment size threshold of 1 <span class="inline-formula">cm<sup>2</sup></span> always yields accurate results and that a higher threshold of 2 <span class="inline-formula">cm<sup>2</sup></span> should yield accurate results for plant hosts that are not polyphyletic form taxa. Due to the structural variability of the plant hosts examined here, no other a priori subsampling strategy yields consistently accurate results. The best approach may be a sequential sampling routine in which sampling continues until the 100 most recently sampled leaves have caused no change to the mean value or confidence interval for damage type diversity and have caused minimal or no change to the herbivory index. For nonmetric multidimensional scaling, at least 1000 <span class="inline-formula">cm<sup>2</sup></span> of leaf surface area should be examined and prediction intervals should be generated to verify the relative positions of all points. Future studies should evaluate the impact of subsampling routines on floras that are collected based on different criteria, such as angiosperm floras for which the only specimens collected are those that are at least 50 % complete.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T17:58:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b956e5c56a684014bc7cf6061fce30a8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2193-0066 2193-0074 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T17:58:34Z |
| publishDate | 2020-02-01 |
| publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Fossil Record |
| spelling | doaj.art-b956e5c56a684014bc7cf6061fce30a82024-01-02T03:34:24ZengPensoft PublishersFossil Record2193-00662193-00742020-02-0123153210.5194/fr-23-15-2020Sampling fossil floras for the study of insect herbivory: how many leaves is enough?S. R. Schachat0S. R. Schachat1S. A. Maccracken2S. A. Maccracken3C. C. Labandeira4C. C. Labandeira5C. C. Labandeira6Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013, USADepartment of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USADepartment of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013, USADepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USADepartment of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013, USADepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USACollege of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China<p>Despite the great importance of plant–insect interactions to the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, many temporal gaps exist in our knowledge of insect herbivory in deep time. Subsampling of fossil leaves, and subsequent extrapolation of results to the entire flora from which they came, is practiced inconsistently and according to inconsistent, often arbitrary criteria. Here we compare herbivory data from three exhaustively sampled fossil floras to establish guidelines for subsampling in future studies. The impact of various subsampling routines is evaluated for three of the most common metrics of insect herbivory: damage type diversity, nonmetric multidimensional scaling, and the herbivory index. The findings presented here suggest that a minimum fragment size threshold of 1 <span class="inline-formula">cm<sup>2</sup></span> always yields accurate results and that a higher threshold of 2 <span class="inline-formula">cm<sup>2</sup></span> should yield accurate results for plant hosts that are not polyphyletic form taxa. Due to the structural variability of the plant hosts examined here, no other a priori subsampling strategy yields consistently accurate results. The best approach may be a sequential sampling routine in which sampling continues until the 100 most recently sampled leaves have caused no change to the mean value or confidence interval for damage type diversity and have caused minimal or no change to the herbivory index. For nonmetric multidimensional scaling, at least 1000 <span class="inline-formula">cm<sup>2</sup></span> of leaf surface area should be examined and prediction intervals should be generated to verify the relative positions of all points. Future studies should evaluate the impact of subsampling routines on floras that are collected based on different criteria, such as angiosperm floras for which the only specimens collected are those that are at least 50 % complete.</p>https://www.foss-rec.net/23/15/2020/fr-23-15-2020.pdf |
| spellingShingle | S. R. Schachat S. R. Schachat S. A. Maccracken S. A. Maccracken C. C. Labandeira C. C. Labandeira C. C. Labandeira Sampling fossil floras for the study of insect herbivory: how many leaves is enough? Fossil Record |
| title | Sampling fossil floras for the study of insect herbivory: how many leaves is enough? |
| title_full | Sampling fossil floras for the study of insect herbivory: how many leaves is enough? |
| title_fullStr | Sampling fossil floras for the study of insect herbivory: how many leaves is enough? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sampling fossil floras for the study of insect herbivory: how many leaves is enough? |
| title_short | Sampling fossil floras for the study of insect herbivory: how many leaves is enough? |
| title_sort | sampling fossil floras for the study of insect herbivory how many leaves is enough |
| url | https://www.foss-rec.net/23/15/2020/fr-23-15-2020.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT srschachat samplingfossilflorasforthestudyofinsectherbivoryhowmanyleavesisenough AT srschachat samplingfossilflorasforthestudyofinsectherbivoryhowmanyleavesisenough AT samaccracken samplingfossilflorasforthestudyofinsectherbivoryhowmanyleavesisenough AT samaccracken samplingfossilflorasforthestudyofinsectherbivoryhowmanyleavesisenough AT cclabandeira samplingfossilflorasforthestudyofinsectherbivoryhowmanyleavesisenough AT cclabandeira samplingfossilflorasforthestudyofinsectherbivoryhowmanyleavesisenough AT cclabandeira samplingfossilflorasforthestudyofinsectherbivoryhowmanyleavesisenough |