A comparative study between kessler suture versus polypropylene mesh implantation to repair tenotomized common calcaneal tendon in rabbits

The present study is assigned to throw the light on the benefit of using Kessler suture compared with polypropylene mesh implantation in healing of induced tenotomy of common calcaneal tendon in a rabbit model based on clinico-histopathological evaluation. Twenty adults New Zealand white male rabbit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saddam Humadi
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: University of Mosul, College of Veterinary Medicine 2019-09-01
Series:Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vetmedmosul.com/article_162907_5ed0dee5383ec0e09399dedab5af7b78.pdf
_version_ 1818056327457406976
author Saddam Humadi
author_facet Saddam Humadi
author_sort Saddam Humadi
collection DOAJ
description The present study is assigned to throw the light on the benefit of using Kessler suture compared with polypropylene mesh implantation in healing of induced tenotomy of common calcaneal tendon in a rabbit model based on clinico-histopathological evaluation. Twenty adults New Zealand white male rabbits were used for this clinical prospective study divided equally and randomly into two groups. The first group, (suture group n=10) and the second group (mesh group n=10). Under the effect of general anesthesia, longitudinal skin incision over the common calcaneal tendon was made, and the skin flap was reflected. The tendon was isolated by blunt dissection from the surrounding tissue, with small curved forceps. Simulation of a rabbit’s common calcaneal tendon rupture was made by sharp transvers incision with scalpel. The first group repair with (Kessler Suture) using polypropylene suture size 4.0. In contrast, the second group repair with (polypropylene mesh implantation) after initial suturing of the cut ends of tendon by two simple interrupted stitches using polyglyconate suture size 4.0. The surgical skin wounds were re-stitched by simple interrupted pattern with 3-0 silk. After clinical follow-up of the treatment rabbits, certain secondary health problems were encountered represented by swelling of operative site and lameness. Grossly, adhesions were noticed between the tendon and subcutaneous tissue in rabbits of both groups. Microscopical examination reflected presence of inflammatory cells perivascular edema and few capillaries at two months. At the end of experiment there were perfect orientation and organization of collagen fibers in mesh group in comparing with suture group. Based on the results obtain from this study, it seemed that both groups reflected best outcome in healing of operated tendons with superiority of mesh group in comparing with suture group.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T12:27:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b95c099c46a54659a40978f21c63d739
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1607-3894
2071-1255
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-12-10T12:27:05Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher University of Mosul, College of Veterinary Medicine
record_format Article
series Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences
spelling doaj.art-b95c099c46a54659a40978f21c63d7392022-12-22T01:48:57ZaraUniversity of Mosul, College of Veterinary MedicineIraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences1607-38942071-12552019-09-0133228929610.33899/ijvs.2019.162907162907A comparative study between kessler suture versus polypropylene mesh implantation to repair tenotomized common calcaneal tendon in rabbitsSaddam Humadi0Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tikrit University, Tikrit, IraqThe present study is assigned to throw the light on the benefit of using Kessler suture compared with polypropylene mesh implantation in healing of induced tenotomy of common calcaneal tendon in a rabbit model based on clinico-histopathological evaluation. Twenty adults New Zealand white male rabbits were used for this clinical prospective study divided equally and randomly into two groups. The first group, (suture group n=10) and the second group (mesh group n=10). Under the effect of general anesthesia, longitudinal skin incision over the common calcaneal tendon was made, and the skin flap was reflected. The tendon was isolated by blunt dissection from the surrounding tissue, with small curved forceps. Simulation of a rabbit’s common calcaneal tendon rupture was made by sharp transvers incision with scalpel. The first group repair with (Kessler Suture) using polypropylene suture size 4.0. In contrast, the second group repair with (polypropylene mesh implantation) after initial suturing of the cut ends of tendon by two simple interrupted stitches using polyglyconate suture size 4.0. The surgical skin wounds were re-stitched by simple interrupted pattern with 3-0 silk. After clinical follow-up of the treatment rabbits, certain secondary health problems were encountered represented by swelling of operative site and lameness. Grossly, adhesions were noticed between the tendon and subcutaneous tissue in rabbits of both groups. Microscopical examination reflected presence of inflammatory cells perivascular edema and few capillaries at two months. At the end of experiment there were perfect orientation and organization of collagen fibers in mesh group in comparing with suture group. Based on the results obtain from this study, it seemed that both groups reflected best outcome in healing of operated tendons with superiority of mesh group in comparing with suture group.https://vetmedmosul.com/article_162907_5ed0dee5383ec0e09399dedab5af7b78.pdfcommon calcaneal tendonrupturekessler suturemeshrabbits
spellingShingle Saddam Humadi
A comparative study between kessler suture versus polypropylene mesh implantation to repair tenotomized common calcaneal tendon in rabbits
Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences
common calcaneal tendon
rupture
kessler suture
mesh
rabbits
title A comparative study between kessler suture versus polypropylene mesh implantation to repair tenotomized common calcaneal tendon in rabbits
title_full A comparative study between kessler suture versus polypropylene mesh implantation to repair tenotomized common calcaneal tendon in rabbits
title_fullStr A comparative study between kessler suture versus polypropylene mesh implantation to repair tenotomized common calcaneal tendon in rabbits
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study between kessler suture versus polypropylene mesh implantation to repair tenotomized common calcaneal tendon in rabbits
title_short A comparative study between kessler suture versus polypropylene mesh implantation to repair tenotomized common calcaneal tendon in rabbits
title_sort comparative study between kessler suture versus polypropylene mesh implantation to repair tenotomized common calcaneal tendon in rabbits
topic common calcaneal tendon
rupture
kessler suture
mesh
rabbits
url https://vetmedmosul.com/article_162907_5ed0dee5383ec0e09399dedab5af7b78.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT saddamhumadi acomparativestudybetweenkesslersutureversuspolypropylenemeshimplantationtorepairtenotomizedcommoncalcanealtendoninrabbits
AT saddamhumadi comparativestudybetweenkesslersutureversuspolypropylenemeshimplantationtorepairtenotomizedcommoncalcanealtendoninrabbits