Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract Purpose The intra‐operative use of tourniquets during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is common practice. The advantages of tourniquet use include decreased operating time and the creation of a bloodless visualisation field. However, tourniquet use has recently been linked with increased post...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. A. Magan, O. Dunseath, P. Armonis, A. Fontalis, B. Kayani, F. S. Haddad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00485-9
_version_ 1797321448211087360
author A. A. Magan
O. Dunseath
P. Armonis
A. Fontalis
B. Kayani
F. S. Haddad
author_facet A. A. Magan
O. Dunseath
P. Armonis
A. Fontalis
B. Kayani
F. S. Haddad
author_sort A. A. Magan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose The intra‐operative use of tourniquets during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is common practice. The advantages of tourniquet use include decreased operating time and the creation of a bloodless visualisation field. However, tourniquet use has recently been linked with increased post‐operative pain, reduced range of motion, and slower functional recovery. Importantly, there is limited evidence of the effect of tourniquet use on infection risk. The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to fill this gap in the literature by synthesising data pertaining to the association between tourniquet use and infection risk in TKA. Methods A systematic literature search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov up to May 2021. Randomized control trials were included, comparing TKA outcomes with and without tourniquet use. The primary outcome was overall infection rate. Secondary outcomes included superficial and deep infection, skin necrosis, skin blistering, DVT rate, and transfusion rate. Results 14 RCTs with 1329 patients were included. The pooled incidence of infection in the tourniquet group (4.0%, 95% CI = 2.7–5.4) was significantly higher compared to the non‐tourniquet group (2.0%, 95% CI = 1.1–3.1) with an OR of 1.9 (95% CI = 1.1–3.76, p = 0.03). The length of hospital stay, haemoglobin drop (0.33 95% CI =0.12–0.54), P = 0.002) and transfusion rates (OR of 2.7, 95%CI = 1.4–5.3, P = < 0.01) were higher in the tourniquet group than the non‐tourniquet group. The difference in the length of inhospital stay was 0.24 days favouring the non‐tourniquet group (95% CI = 0.10–0.38, P = < 0.01). The incidence of skin blistering (OR 2.6, 95% CI = 0.7–9.9, p = 0.17), skin necrosis (OR 3.0, 95% CI = 0.50–19.3, p = 0.25), and DVT rates (OR 1.5, 95% CI = 0.60–3.60, p = 0.36) did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion Quantitative synthesis of the data suggested tourniquet use was associated with an increased overall risk of infection, intraoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion and longer hospital stay. Findings of this meta‐analysis do not support the routine use of tourniquet in TKA and arthroplasty surgeons should consider any potential additional risks associated with its use. Level of evidence meta‐analysis, Level II.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:58:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b974ed35a1e84c09b224787ac172e3e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-1153
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T04:58:45Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-b974ed35a1e84c09b224787ac172e3e12024-02-07T14:50:37ZengWileyJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics2197-11532022-01-0191n/an/a10.1186/s40634-022-00485-9Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trialsA. A. Magan0O. Dunseath1P. Armonis2A. Fontalis3B. Kayani4F. S. Haddad5Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity College Hospital235 Euston Road, FitzroviaNW1 2BULondonUKUniversity College LondonGower StWC1E 6BTLondonUKUniversity College LondonGower StWC1E 6BTLondonUKDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity College Hospital235 Euston Road, FitzroviaNW1 2BULondonUKDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity College Hospital235 Euston Road, FitzroviaNW1 2BULondonUKDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity College Hospital235 Euston Road, FitzroviaNW1 2BULondonUKAbstract Purpose The intra‐operative use of tourniquets during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is common practice. The advantages of tourniquet use include decreased operating time and the creation of a bloodless visualisation field. However, tourniquet use has recently been linked with increased post‐operative pain, reduced range of motion, and slower functional recovery. Importantly, there is limited evidence of the effect of tourniquet use on infection risk. The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to fill this gap in the literature by synthesising data pertaining to the association between tourniquet use and infection risk in TKA. Methods A systematic literature search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov up to May 2021. Randomized control trials were included, comparing TKA outcomes with and without tourniquet use. The primary outcome was overall infection rate. Secondary outcomes included superficial and deep infection, skin necrosis, skin blistering, DVT rate, and transfusion rate. Results 14 RCTs with 1329 patients were included. The pooled incidence of infection in the tourniquet group (4.0%, 95% CI = 2.7–5.4) was significantly higher compared to the non‐tourniquet group (2.0%, 95% CI = 1.1–3.1) with an OR of 1.9 (95% CI = 1.1–3.76, p = 0.03). The length of hospital stay, haemoglobin drop (0.33 95% CI =0.12–0.54), P = 0.002) and transfusion rates (OR of 2.7, 95%CI = 1.4–5.3, P = < 0.01) were higher in the tourniquet group than the non‐tourniquet group. The difference in the length of inhospital stay was 0.24 days favouring the non‐tourniquet group (95% CI = 0.10–0.38, P = < 0.01). The incidence of skin blistering (OR 2.6, 95% CI = 0.7–9.9, p = 0.17), skin necrosis (OR 3.0, 95% CI = 0.50–19.3, p = 0.25), and DVT rates (OR 1.5, 95% CI = 0.60–3.60, p = 0.36) did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion Quantitative synthesis of the data suggested tourniquet use was associated with an increased overall risk of infection, intraoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion and longer hospital stay. Findings of this meta‐analysis do not support the routine use of tourniquet in TKA and arthroplasty surgeons should consider any potential additional risks associated with its use. Level of evidence meta‐analysis, Level II.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00485-9TourniquetTotal knee arthroplastyTKAInfectionMeta‐analysis
spellingShingle A. A. Magan
O. Dunseath
P. Armonis
A. Fontalis
B. Kayani
F. S. Haddad
Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Tourniquet
Total knee arthroplasty
TKA
Infection
Meta‐analysis
title Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Tourniquet
Total knee arthroplasty
TKA
Infection
Meta‐analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00485-9
work_keys_str_mv AT aamagan tourniquetuseintotalkneearthroplastyandtheriskofinfectionametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT odunseath tourniquetuseintotalkneearthroplastyandtheriskofinfectionametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT parmonis tourniquetuseintotalkneearthroplastyandtheriskofinfectionametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT afontalis tourniquetuseintotalkneearthroplastyandtheriskofinfectionametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT bkayani tourniquetuseintotalkneearthroplastyandtheriskofinfectionametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT fshaddad tourniquetuseintotalkneearthroplastyandtheriskofinfectionametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials