Investigating rater–student interaction, gender bias, and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentation

The study aims to investigate the severity of raters toward examinees' performances and to analyze biases subject to genders and academic majors based on the rater–examinee interactions. Data were collected across a 13-week research seminar course in English. Six raters were selected to rate 33...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fitria Arifiyanti, Soeharto Soeharto, Stephen Amukune, Son Van Nguyen, Khalil Aburezeq, Achmad Hidayatullah, Eri Sarimanah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-06-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023037556
_version_ 1797818662893125632
author Fitria Arifiyanti
Soeharto Soeharto
Stephen Amukune
Son Van Nguyen
Khalil Aburezeq
Achmad Hidayatullah
Eri Sarimanah
author_facet Fitria Arifiyanti
Soeharto Soeharto
Stephen Amukune
Son Van Nguyen
Khalil Aburezeq
Achmad Hidayatullah
Eri Sarimanah
author_sort Fitria Arifiyanti
collection DOAJ
description The study aims to investigate the severity of raters toward examinees' performances and to analyze biases subject to genders and academic majors based on the rater–examinee interactions. Data were collected across a 13-week research seminar course in English. Six raters were selected to rate 33 examinees using 18-item criteria. The many-facet Rasch measurement was utilized to analyze rater–examinee interactions and bias factors. The results confirmed that the instrument is reliable and valid. This study depicted the interaction between raters and other facets using a variable map, where the raters exhibited different levels of severity/leniency in scoring students' performances in oral presentations at the research seminar course. The result based on the Rasch analysis also confirmed that gender and academic majors contaminated rater assessment. Bias interaction between raters and student gender was detected, and Rater 6 displayed bias based on gender due to the tendency to give higher scores to female than male participants with a target contrast of 2.05 logits. Bias interaction between rater academic majors and student academic majors was also identified among raters with linguistics and psychology majors.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:11:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b97d1e0c7df64922a5ab2e670d9642ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:11:15Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-b97d1e0c7df64922a5ab2e670d9642ea2023-05-27T04:26:14ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-06-0196e16548Investigating rater–student interaction, gender bias, and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentationFitria Arifiyanti0Soeharto Soeharto1Stephen Amukune2Son Van Nguyen3Khalil Aburezeq4Achmad Hidayatullah5Eri Sarimanah6Doctoral School of Education, University of Szeged, 30-34, Petőfi S. sgt., H-6722, Szeged, Hungary; Corresponding author.Doctoral School of Education, University of Szeged, 30-34, Petőfi S. sgt., H-6722, Szeged, HungaryDoctoral School of Education, University of Szeged, 30-34, Petőfi S. sgt., H-6722, Szeged, HungaryDoctoral School of Education, University of Szeged, 30-34, Petőfi S. sgt., H-6722, Szeged, Hungary; Thuyloi University, No. 175, Tay Son Street, Dong Da District, Hanoi, Viet NamDoctoral School of Education, University of Szeged, 30-34, Petőfi S. sgt., H-6722, Szeged, HungaryDoctoral School of Education, University of Szeged, 30-34, Petőfi S. sgt., H-6722, Szeged, HungaryFaculty of Language and Literature Education, Pakuan University, IndonesiaThe study aims to investigate the severity of raters toward examinees' performances and to analyze biases subject to genders and academic majors based on the rater–examinee interactions. Data were collected across a 13-week research seminar course in English. Six raters were selected to rate 33 examinees using 18-item criteria. The many-facet Rasch measurement was utilized to analyze rater–examinee interactions and bias factors. The results confirmed that the instrument is reliable and valid. This study depicted the interaction between raters and other facets using a variable map, where the raters exhibited different levels of severity/leniency in scoring students' performances in oral presentations at the research seminar course. The result based on the Rasch analysis also confirmed that gender and academic majors contaminated rater assessment. Bias interaction between raters and student gender was detected, and Rater 6 displayed bias based on gender due to the tendency to give higher scores to female than male participants with a target contrast of 2.05 logits. Bias interaction between rater academic majors and student academic majors was also identified among raters with linguistics and psychology majors.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023037556Gender biasMajor biasRater–Student interactionMany-facet Rasch measurementAssessment
spellingShingle Fitria Arifiyanti
Soeharto Soeharto
Stephen Amukune
Son Van Nguyen
Khalil Aburezeq
Achmad Hidayatullah
Eri Sarimanah
Investigating rater–student interaction, gender bias, and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentation
Heliyon
Gender bias
Major bias
Rater–Student interaction
Many-facet Rasch measurement
Assessment
title Investigating rater–student interaction, gender bias, and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentation
title_full Investigating rater–student interaction, gender bias, and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentation
title_fullStr Investigating rater–student interaction, gender bias, and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentation
title_full_unstemmed Investigating rater–student interaction, gender bias, and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentation
title_short Investigating rater–student interaction, gender bias, and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentation
title_sort investigating rater student interaction gender bias and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentation
topic Gender bias
Major bias
Rater–Student interaction
Many-facet Rasch measurement
Assessment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023037556
work_keys_str_mv AT fitriaarifiyanti investigatingraterstudentinteractiongenderbiasandmajorbiasintheassessmentofresearchseminarpresentation
AT soehartosoeharto investigatingraterstudentinteractiongenderbiasandmajorbiasintheassessmentofresearchseminarpresentation
AT stephenamukune investigatingraterstudentinteractiongenderbiasandmajorbiasintheassessmentofresearchseminarpresentation
AT sonvannguyen investigatingraterstudentinteractiongenderbiasandmajorbiasintheassessmentofresearchseminarpresentation
AT khalilaburezeq investigatingraterstudentinteractiongenderbiasandmajorbiasintheassessmentofresearchseminarpresentation
AT achmadhidayatullah investigatingraterstudentinteractiongenderbiasandmajorbiasintheassessmentofresearchseminarpresentation
AT erisarimanah investigatingraterstudentinteractiongenderbiasandmajorbiasintheassessmentofresearchseminarpresentation