Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background The present study aims to assess the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on stability in implants placed in healed sites. Material and methods The present study followed the SPIRIT statement and is reported according to CONSORT. Patients were randomly allocated to LLLT or...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2021-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Implant Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00331-0 |
_version_ | 1818779254414901248 |
---|---|
author | Mateus de Azevedo Kinalski Bernardo Antonio Agostini Cesar Dalmolin Bergoli Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos |
author_facet | Mateus de Azevedo Kinalski Bernardo Antonio Agostini Cesar Dalmolin Bergoli Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos |
author_sort | Mateus de Azevedo Kinalski |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The present study aims to assess the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on stability in implants placed in healed sites. Material and methods The present study followed the SPIRIT statement and is reported according to CONSORT. Patients were randomly allocated to LLLT or control groups. LLLT consisted in the application of 808-nm GaAlA laser applied before the preparation of the implant bed and after suturing (80 seconds; 11J/cm2). Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and the distance between the implant platform to the alveolar bone crest (millimeters) were assessed at implant placement (T0) and the abutment selection phase (4–6 months, Ta). Results A total of 64 implants were placed in 33 patients. The insertion torque ranged from 10 to 70 N.cm (mean 43.23; SD ±16.82). The T0 ISQ ranged from 18 to 95.5 (mean 61.7; SD ±18.23) and the crestal bone radiographic distance was 2.03 mm (SD±1.27). At Ta, the ISQ ranged from 39 to 90 (mean 64.2; SD±9.84), and the mean crestal bone radiographic loss was 1.70mm (SD±1.65). However, no differences were observed when LLLT and control groups were compared with ISQ difference (Ta–T0; p=0.598) or radiographical peri-implant alterations (p=0.531). Conclusion LLLT did not influence the implant stability in implants placed in healed sites compared to a control group. Trial registration ReBEC, RBR-35TNJ7 . Registered May 23, 2018 |
first_indexed | 2024-12-18T11:57:42Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b982298b082a4ab0b8efd034168d3e43 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2198-4034 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-18T11:57:42Z |
publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Implant Dentistry |
spelling | doaj.art-b982298b082a4ab0b8efd034168d3e432022-12-21T21:09:00ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Implant Dentistry2198-40342021-06-01711710.1186/s40729-021-00331-0Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trialMateus de Azevedo Kinalski0Bernardo Antonio Agostini1Cesar Dalmolin Bergoli2Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos3Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of PelotasGraduate Program in Dentistry, Meridional Faculty/IMEDGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of PelotasGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of PelotasAbstract Background The present study aims to assess the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on stability in implants placed in healed sites. Material and methods The present study followed the SPIRIT statement and is reported according to CONSORT. Patients were randomly allocated to LLLT or control groups. LLLT consisted in the application of 808-nm GaAlA laser applied before the preparation of the implant bed and after suturing (80 seconds; 11J/cm2). Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and the distance between the implant platform to the alveolar bone crest (millimeters) were assessed at implant placement (T0) and the abutment selection phase (4–6 months, Ta). Results A total of 64 implants were placed in 33 patients. The insertion torque ranged from 10 to 70 N.cm (mean 43.23; SD ±16.82). The T0 ISQ ranged from 18 to 95.5 (mean 61.7; SD ±18.23) and the crestal bone radiographic distance was 2.03 mm (SD±1.27). At Ta, the ISQ ranged from 39 to 90 (mean 64.2; SD±9.84), and the mean crestal bone radiographic loss was 1.70mm (SD±1.65). However, no differences were observed when LLLT and control groups were compared with ISQ difference (Ta–T0; p=0.598) or radiographical peri-implant alterations (p=0.531). Conclusion LLLT did not influence the implant stability in implants placed in healed sites compared to a control group. Trial registration ReBEC, RBR-35TNJ7 . Registered May 23, 2018https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00331-0Dental implantsGallium aluminum arsenide lasersOsseointegrationRandomized clinical trial |
spellingShingle | Mateus de Azevedo Kinalski Bernardo Antonio Agostini Cesar Dalmolin Bergoli Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial International Journal of Implant Dentistry Dental implants Gallium aluminum arsenide lasers Osseointegration Randomized clinical trial |
title | Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | influence of low level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Dental implants Gallium aluminum arsenide lasers Osseointegration Randomized clinical trial |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00331-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mateusdeazevedokinalski influenceoflowlevellasertherapyonimplantstabilityinimplantsplacedinhealedsitesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bernardoantonioagostini influenceoflowlevellasertherapyonimplantstabilityinimplantsplacedinhealedsitesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cesardalmolinbergoli influenceoflowlevellasertherapyonimplantstabilityinimplantsplacedinhealedsitesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mateusbertolinifernandesdossantos influenceoflowlevellasertherapyonimplantstabilityinimplantsplacedinhealedsitesarandomizedcontrolledtrial |