Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background The present study aims to assess the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on stability in implants placed in healed sites. Material and methods The present study followed the SPIRIT statement and is reported according to CONSORT. Patients were randomly allocated to LLLT or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mateus de Azevedo Kinalski, Bernardo Antonio Agostini, Cesar Dalmolin Bergoli, Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-06-01
Series:International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00331-0
_version_ 1818779254414901248
author Mateus de Azevedo Kinalski
Bernardo Antonio Agostini
Cesar Dalmolin Bergoli
Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos
author_facet Mateus de Azevedo Kinalski
Bernardo Antonio Agostini
Cesar Dalmolin Bergoli
Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos
author_sort Mateus de Azevedo Kinalski
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The present study aims to assess the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on stability in implants placed in healed sites. Material and methods The present study followed the SPIRIT statement and is reported according to CONSORT. Patients were randomly allocated to LLLT or control groups. LLLT consisted in the application of 808-nm GaAlA laser applied before the preparation of the implant bed and after suturing (80 seconds; 11J/cm2). Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and the distance between the implant platform to the alveolar bone crest (millimeters) were assessed at implant placement (T0) and the abutment selection phase (4–6 months, Ta). Results A total of 64 implants were placed in 33 patients. The insertion torque ranged from 10 to 70 N.cm (mean 43.23; SD ±16.82). The T0 ISQ ranged from 18 to 95.5 (mean 61.7; SD ±18.23) and the crestal bone radiographic distance was 2.03 mm (SD±1.27). At Ta, the ISQ ranged from 39 to 90 (mean 64.2; SD±9.84), and the mean crestal bone radiographic loss was 1.70mm (SD±1.65). However, no differences were observed when LLLT and control groups were compared with ISQ difference (Ta–T0; p=0.598) or radiographical peri-implant alterations (p=0.531). Conclusion LLLT did not influence the implant stability in implants placed in healed sites compared to a control group. Trial registration ReBEC, RBR-35TNJ7 . Registered May 23, 2018
first_indexed 2024-12-18T11:57:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b982298b082a4ab0b8efd034168d3e43
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2198-4034
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T11:57:42Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series International Journal of Implant Dentistry
spelling doaj.art-b982298b082a4ab0b8efd034168d3e432022-12-21T21:09:00ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Implant Dentistry2198-40342021-06-01711710.1186/s40729-021-00331-0Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trialMateus de Azevedo Kinalski0Bernardo Antonio Agostini1Cesar Dalmolin Bergoli2Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos3Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of PelotasGraduate Program in Dentistry, Meridional Faculty/IMEDGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of PelotasGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of PelotasAbstract Background The present study aims to assess the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on stability in implants placed in healed sites. Material and methods The present study followed the SPIRIT statement and is reported according to CONSORT. Patients were randomly allocated to LLLT or control groups. LLLT consisted in the application of 808-nm GaAlA laser applied before the preparation of the implant bed and after suturing (80 seconds; 11J/cm2). Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and the distance between the implant platform to the alveolar bone crest (millimeters) were assessed at implant placement (T0) and the abutment selection phase (4–6 months, Ta). Results A total of 64 implants were placed in 33 patients. The insertion torque ranged from 10 to 70 N.cm (mean 43.23; SD ±16.82). The T0 ISQ ranged from 18 to 95.5 (mean 61.7; SD ±18.23) and the crestal bone radiographic distance was 2.03 mm (SD±1.27). At Ta, the ISQ ranged from 39 to 90 (mean 64.2; SD±9.84), and the mean crestal bone radiographic loss was 1.70mm (SD±1.65). However, no differences were observed when LLLT and control groups were compared with ISQ difference (Ta–T0; p=0.598) or radiographical peri-implant alterations (p=0.531). Conclusion LLLT did not influence the implant stability in implants placed in healed sites compared to a control group. Trial registration ReBEC, RBR-35TNJ7 . Registered May 23, 2018https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00331-0Dental implantsGallium aluminum arsenide lasersOsseointegrationRandomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Mateus de Azevedo Kinalski
Bernardo Antonio Agostini
Cesar Dalmolin Bergoli
Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos
Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Dental implants
Gallium aluminum arsenide lasers
Osseointegration
Randomized clinical trial
title Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort influence of low level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites a randomized controlled trial
topic Dental implants
Gallium aluminum arsenide lasers
Osseointegration
Randomized clinical trial
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00331-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mateusdeazevedokinalski influenceoflowlevellasertherapyonimplantstabilityinimplantsplacedinhealedsitesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bernardoantonioagostini influenceoflowlevellasertherapyonimplantstabilityinimplantsplacedinhealedsitesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cesardalmolinbergoli influenceoflowlevellasertherapyonimplantstabilityinimplantsplacedinhealedsitesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mateusbertolinifernandesdossantos influenceoflowlevellasertherapyonimplantstabilityinimplantsplacedinhealedsitesarandomizedcontrolledtrial