Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Proximal Tibial Fracture with Compromised Skin Condition Treated with Ilizarov External Fixator: A Clinical Interventional Study

Introduction: In proximal tibia fractures, the main goal is to achieve accurate reduction and stability without significantly compromising the soft tissue integrity and vascularity. Ilizarov external fixation minimises iatrogenic soft tissue dissection and associated complication and permits ear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ADITYA SHRIMAL, DEEPAK KUMAR YADAV, MAHESH BHATI, JAYESH CHOUHAN, PRADEEP CHOUDHARY
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2021-10-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/15583/50034_CE[Ra1]_F[SH]_PF1(AG_SHU)_PFA(AG_SHU_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
_version_ 1818352609586577408
author ADITYA SHRIMAL
DEEPAK KUMAR YADAV
MAHESH BHATI
JAYESH CHOUHAN
PRADEEP CHOUDHARY
author_facet ADITYA SHRIMAL
DEEPAK KUMAR YADAV
MAHESH BHATI
JAYESH CHOUHAN
PRADEEP CHOUDHARY
author_sort ADITYA SHRIMAL
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: In proximal tibia fractures, the main goal is to achieve accurate reduction and stability without significantly compromising the soft tissue integrity and vascularity. Ilizarov external fixation minimises iatrogenic soft tissue dissection and associated complication and permits early mobilisation and weight bearing. Aim: To describe the clinicoradiological outcome of proximal tibial fractures with compromised skin condition treated with ilizarov external fixation with or without minimal internal fixation. Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical interventional study containing 30 cases (23 closed with compromised skin condition and seven open) of proximal tibia fractures who were treated with ilizarov external fixator between June 2018 to October 2020 was conducted. After discharge patients were followed-up at an interval of two weeks after discharge, and then on monthly basis until fracture union occurred for a minimum period of 6-12 months. Results were analysed both clinically and radiologically using Johner and Wruh’s criteria. Results: In present study of 24 males and six females were included and their mean age was 39.66±11.32 years. Fracture union was achieved in all cases with a maximum period of 22 weeks and minimum being 12 weeks on fixator. Average number of days on fixator was 105. Average range of motion of knee was 115.52±13.32° with one patient having extension lag up to 15° and six patients having extension lag up to 10°. No patient complained of functional knee instability. Pin track infection occurred in six patients, three patients had joint stiffness and limb shortening occurred in two patients. Overall results according to Johner and Wruh’s criteria were excellent in 23 patients, good in five patients and fair in two patients. Conclusion: Illizarov external fixature is an excellent treatment method in proximal tibia fracture with compromised skin condition not immediately amenable to internal fixation.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T18:56:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b989418609704e14aedeeda8be0bd14f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T18:56:21Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-b989418609704e14aedeeda8be0bd14f2022-12-21T23:34:48ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2021-10-011510RC14RC1910.7860/JCDR/2021/50034.15583Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Proximal Tibial Fracture with Compromised Skin Condition Treated with Ilizarov External Fixator: A Clinical Interventional StudyADITYA SHRIMAL0DEEPAK KUMAR YADAV1MAHESH BHATI2JAYESH CHOUHAN3PRADEEP CHOUDHARY4Pg Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr SN Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr SN Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.Senior Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr SN Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.Pg Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr SN Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.Pg Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr SN Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.Introduction: In proximal tibia fractures, the main goal is to achieve accurate reduction and stability without significantly compromising the soft tissue integrity and vascularity. Ilizarov external fixation minimises iatrogenic soft tissue dissection and associated complication and permits early mobilisation and weight bearing. Aim: To describe the clinicoradiological outcome of proximal tibial fractures with compromised skin condition treated with ilizarov external fixation with or without minimal internal fixation. Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical interventional study containing 30 cases (23 closed with compromised skin condition and seven open) of proximal tibia fractures who were treated with ilizarov external fixator between June 2018 to October 2020 was conducted. After discharge patients were followed-up at an interval of two weeks after discharge, and then on monthly basis until fracture union occurred for a minimum period of 6-12 months. Results were analysed both clinically and radiologically using Johner and Wruh’s criteria. Results: In present study of 24 males and six females were included and their mean age was 39.66±11.32 years. Fracture union was achieved in all cases with a maximum period of 22 weeks and minimum being 12 weeks on fixator. Average number of days on fixator was 105. Average range of motion of knee was 115.52±13.32° with one patient having extension lag up to 15° and six patients having extension lag up to 10°. No patient complained of functional knee instability. Pin track infection occurred in six patients, three patients had joint stiffness and limb shortening occurred in two patients. Overall results according to Johner and Wruh’s criteria were excellent in 23 patients, good in five patients and fair in two patients. Conclusion: Illizarov external fixature is an excellent treatment method in proximal tibia fracture with compromised skin condition not immediately amenable to internal fixation.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/15583/50034_CE[Ra1]_F[SH]_PF1(AG_SHU)_PFA(AG_SHU_KM)_PN(KM).pdfhigh energy traumajohner and wruh’s criterialigamentotaxis
spellingShingle ADITYA SHRIMAL
DEEPAK KUMAR YADAV
MAHESH BHATI
JAYESH CHOUHAN
PRADEEP CHOUDHARY
Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Proximal Tibial Fracture with Compromised Skin Condition Treated with Ilizarov External Fixator: A Clinical Interventional Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
high energy trauma
johner and wruh’s criteria
ligamentotaxis
title Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Proximal Tibial Fracture with Compromised Skin Condition Treated with Ilizarov External Fixator: A Clinical Interventional Study
title_full Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Proximal Tibial Fracture with Compromised Skin Condition Treated with Ilizarov External Fixator: A Clinical Interventional Study
title_fullStr Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Proximal Tibial Fracture with Compromised Skin Condition Treated with Ilizarov External Fixator: A Clinical Interventional Study
title_full_unstemmed Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Proximal Tibial Fracture with Compromised Skin Condition Treated with Ilizarov External Fixator: A Clinical Interventional Study
title_short Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Proximal Tibial Fracture with Compromised Skin Condition Treated with Ilizarov External Fixator: A Clinical Interventional Study
title_sort functional and radiological outcomes of proximal tibial fracture with compromised skin condition treated with ilizarov external fixator a clinical interventional study
topic high energy trauma
johner and wruh’s criteria
ligamentotaxis
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/15583/50034_CE[Ra1]_F[SH]_PF1(AG_SHU)_PFA(AG_SHU_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT adityashrimal functionalandradiologicaloutcomesofproximaltibialfracturewithcompromisedskinconditiontreatedwithilizarovexternalfixatoraclinicalinterventionalstudy
AT deepakkumaryadav functionalandradiologicaloutcomesofproximaltibialfracturewithcompromisedskinconditiontreatedwithilizarovexternalfixatoraclinicalinterventionalstudy
AT maheshbhati functionalandradiologicaloutcomesofproximaltibialfracturewithcompromisedskinconditiontreatedwithilizarovexternalfixatoraclinicalinterventionalstudy
AT jayeshchouhan functionalandradiologicaloutcomesofproximaltibialfracturewithcompromisedskinconditiontreatedwithilizarovexternalfixatoraclinicalinterventionalstudy
AT pradeepchoudhary functionalandradiologicaloutcomesofproximaltibialfracturewithcompromisedskinconditiontreatedwithilizarovexternalfixatoraclinicalinterventionalstudy