Interpsychological Exists!

Is there a joint, cooperative action taking place every time pupils do something in fours in a lesson, for instance, discuss the content of a text according to the task given by a teacher? Using clinical research of simple child-adult interactions, we explain how the following essential features of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zuckerman G.A., Ryabinina L.A., Chaban T.Y., Romanova L.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2018-11-01
Series:Культурно-историческая психология
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2018/n3/Zuckerman_Ryabinina_Chaban_et_al.shtml
_version_ 1818391568712728576
author Zuckerman G.A.,
Ryabinina L.A.
Chaban T.Y.,
Romanova L.M.
author_facet Zuckerman G.A.,
Ryabinina L.A.
Chaban T.Y.,
Romanova L.M.
author_sort Zuckerman G.A.,
collection DOAJ
description Is there a joint, cooperative action taking place every time pupils do something in fours in a lesson, for instance, discuss the content of a text according to the task given by a teacher? Using clinical research of simple child-adult interactions, we explain how the following essential features of interpsychological action can be found in children’s activities: (1) a child’s initiative in solving the task (2) intersection of children’s initiatives upon the object of their activities (3) orientation of children’s individual actions both towards the object of their activities (in this case, the meaning of the text) and the partner (his/her understanding of the sought-for meaning) (4) unfinished, in-progress character of the ability to understand text in every child participating in the interaction (5) nonadditive character of the interaction outcome which exceeds the individual abilities of the participants (6) stability of the achieved outcome, its persistence in individual actions even outside the interaction (7) specially arranged activities of the adult participant of the interaction. At the project stage, the adult creates the focus in which the children’s initiatives can meet. In our case, it was a question to the text which implied reflective understanding that was only beginning to emerge in second-year pupils. At the stage of direct interaction, the adult (1) supports productive initiatives of the children, yet restraining from full participation in solving the task (2) protects the child community from unproductive conflicts arising due to violations of communicative norms.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T05:15:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b98ea83d5ebb45568e94fd2522b441f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1816-5435
2224-8935
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T05:15:36Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
record_format Article
series Культурно-историческая психология
spelling doaj.art-b98ea83d5ebb45568e94fd2522b441f22022-12-21T23:15:51ZengMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationКультурно-историческая психология1816-54352224-89352018-11-01143748410.17759/chp.2018140308Interpsychological Exists!Zuckerman G.A., 0Ryabinina L.A.1Chaban T.Y., 2Romanova L.M.3Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, RussiaCenter for Assessment of Quality in Education, Krasnoyarsk, RussiaCenter for Education Quality Assessment, RussiaCenter for Education Quality Assessment, RussiaIs there a joint, cooperative action taking place every time pupils do something in fours in a lesson, for instance, discuss the content of a text according to the task given by a teacher? Using clinical research of simple child-adult interactions, we explain how the following essential features of interpsychological action can be found in children’s activities: (1) a child’s initiative in solving the task (2) intersection of children’s initiatives upon the object of their activities (3) orientation of children’s individual actions both towards the object of their activities (in this case, the meaning of the text) and the partner (his/her understanding of the sought-for meaning) (4) unfinished, in-progress character of the ability to understand text in every child participating in the interaction (5) nonadditive character of the interaction outcome which exceeds the individual abilities of the participants (6) stability of the achieved outcome, its persistence in individual actions even outside the interaction (7) specially arranged activities of the adult participant of the interaction. At the project stage, the adult creates the focus in which the children’s initiatives can meet. In our case, it was a question to the text which implied reflective understanding that was only beginning to emerge in second-year pupils. At the stage of direct interaction, the adult (1) supports productive initiatives of the children, yet restraining from full participation in solving the task (2) protects the child community from unproductive conflicts arising due to violations of communicative norms.http://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2018/n3/Zuckerman_Ryabinina_Chaban_et_al.shtmlinterpsychological actionchild-adult interactionunderstanding textreflective questions to texts
spellingShingle Zuckerman G.A.,
Ryabinina L.A.
Chaban T.Y.,
Romanova L.M.
Interpsychological Exists!
Культурно-историческая психология
interpsychological action
child-adult interaction
understanding text
reflective questions to texts
title Interpsychological Exists!
title_full Interpsychological Exists!
title_fullStr Interpsychological Exists!
title_full_unstemmed Interpsychological Exists!
title_short Interpsychological Exists!
title_sort interpsychological exists
topic interpsychological action
child-adult interaction
understanding text
reflective questions to texts
url http://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2018/n3/Zuckerman_Ryabinina_Chaban_et_al.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT zuckermanga interpsychologicalexists
AT ryabininala interpsychologicalexists
AT chabanty interpsychologicalexists
AT romanovalm interpsychologicalexists