Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters

This special report compares the measurement of primary health care (PHC) expenditure proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and by the World Health Organization (WHO), according to the global framework for reporting health expenditures (SHA 2011) in three count...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Magdalena Rathe, Patricia Hernández-Peña, Claudia Pescetto, Cornelis Van Mosseveld, Maria Angélica Borges dos Santos, Laura Rivas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pan American Health Organization 2022-06-01
Series:Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/56088
_version_ 1811343893787049984
author Magdalena Rathe
Patricia Hernández-Peña
Claudia Pescetto
Cornelis Van Mosseveld
Maria Angélica Borges dos Santos
Laura Rivas
author_facet Magdalena Rathe
Patricia Hernández-Peña
Claudia Pescetto
Cornelis Van Mosseveld
Maria Angélica Borges dos Santos
Laura Rivas
author_sort Magdalena Rathe
collection DOAJ
description This special report compares the measurement of primary health care (PHC) expenditure proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and by the World Health Organization (WHO), according to the global framework for reporting health expenditures (SHA 2011) in three countries in the Region of the Americas. There are conceptual differences: (1) operationalization as basic care, by OECD, versus first contact, by WHO; (2) a wider range of goods and services in the WHO definition (including medicines, administration, and collective preventive services); and (3) consideration only of services in outpatient providers by OECD. PHC expenditures as a percentage of current healthcare spending in 2017 for WHO and OECD: Mexico (43.6% vs. 15.1%); Dominican Republic (41.1% vs. 5.75%), and Costa Rica (31.4% vs. 5.7%). The broad WHO definition of PHC as first contact facilitates inclusion of services that reflect the way countries provide care to their populations. Even so, WHO could improve its category descriptions for the purposes of international comparison. Restricting PHC to outpatient providers (as the OECD does) greatly limits measurement and excludes interventions intrinsic to the concept of PHC, such as collective preventive services. As a transitional step, we recommend that countries should monitor PHC funding and should explain what they include in their definition. SHA 2011 makes it possible to identify and compare these differences.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T19:38:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b98ecd55c9a04bc3a9b474505c6914cf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1020-4989
1680-5348
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T19:38:12Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Pan American Health Organization
record_format Article
series Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
spelling doaj.art-b98ecd55c9a04bc3a9b474505c6914cf2022-12-22T02:32:58ZengPan American Health OrganizationRevista Panamericana de Salud Pública1020-49891680-53482022-06-0146701710.26633/RPSP.2022.70rpspPrimary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what mattersMagdalena Rathe0Patricia Hernández-Peña1Claudia Pescetto2Cornelis Van Mosseveld3Maria Angélica Borges dos Santos4Laura Rivas5Fundación Plenitud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, Magdalena RatheConsultant, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States of America.Consultant, The Hague, Netherlands.Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandThis special report compares the measurement of primary health care (PHC) expenditure proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and by the World Health Organization (WHO), according to the global framework for reporting health expenditures (SHA 2011) in three countries in the Region of the Americas. There are conceptual differences: (1) operationalization as basic care, by OECD, versus first contact, by WHO; (2) a wider range of goods and services in the WHO definition (including medicines, administration, and collective preventive services); and (3) consideration only of services in outpatient providers by OECD. PHC expenditures as a percentage of current healthcare spending in 2017 for WHO and OECD: Mexico (43.6% vs. 15.1%); Dominican Republic (41.1% vs. 5.75%), and Costa Rica (31.4% vs. 5.7%). The broad WHO definition of PHC as first contact facilitates inclusion of services that reflect the way countries provide care to their populations. Even so, WHO could improve its category descriptions for the purposes of international comparison. Restricting PHC to outpatient providers (as the OECD does) greatly limits measurement and excludes interventions intrinsic to the concept of PHC, such as collective preventive services. As a transitional step, we recommend that countries should monitor PHC funding and should explain what they include in their definition. SHA 2011 makes it possible to identify and compare these differences.https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/56088primary health carehealth expendituresmeasurements, methods, and theories
spellingShingle Magdalena Rathe
Patricia Hernández-Peña
Claudia Pescetto
Cornelis Van Mosseveld
Maria Angélica Borges dos Santos
Laura Rivas
Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
primary health care
health expenditures
measurements, methods, and theories
title Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters
title_full Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters
title_fullStr Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters
title_full_unstemmed Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters
title_short Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters
title_sort primary health care expenditure in the americas measuring what matters
topic primary health care
health expenditures
measurements, methods, and theories
url https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/56088
work_keys_str_mv AT magdalenarathe primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters
AT patriciahernandezpena primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters
AT claudiapescetto primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters
AT cornelisvanmosseveld primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters
AT mariaangelicaborgesdossantos primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters
AT laurarivas primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters