Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental Delay
ObjectiveTo compare the scores of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development second edition (BSID-II) and the third edition, Bayley-III, in children with suspected developmental delay and to determine the cutoff score for developmental delay in the Bayley-III.MethodsChildren younger than 42 months (n=6...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-42-313.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797706276684169216 |
|---|---|
| author | You Gyoung Yi In Young Sung Jin Sook Yuk |
| author_facet | You Gyoung Yi In Young Sung Jin Sook Yuk |
| author_sort | You Gyoung Yi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ObjectiveTo compare the scores of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development second edition (BSID-II) and the third edition, Bayley-III, in children with suspected developmental delay and to determine the cutoff score for developmental delay in the Bayley-III.MethodsChildren younger than 42 months (n=62) with suspected developmental delay who visited our department between 2014 and 2015 were assessed with both the BSID-II and Bayley-III tests.ResultsThe mean Bayley-III Cognitive Language Composite (CLC) score was 5.8 points higher than the mean BSID-II Mental Developmental Index (MDI) score, and the mean Bayley-III Motor Composite (MC) score was 7.9 points higher than the mean BSID-II Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) score. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of a BSID-II MDI score <70, Bayley-III CLC scores showed a cutoff of 78.0 (96.6% sensitivity and 93.9% specificity). In ROC analysis of a BSID-II PDI score <70, the Bayley-III MC score showed a cutoff of 80.ConclusionThere was a strong correlation between the BSID-II and Bayley-III in children with suspected developmental delay. The Bayley-III identified fewer children with developmental delay. The recommended cutoff value for developmental delay increased from a BSID-II score of 70 to a Bayley-III CLC score of 78 and Bayley-III MC score of 80. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:48:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b9923ab4aba441f7bbd936694ee9c06e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2234-0645 2234-0653 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:48:51Z |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-b9923ab4aba441f7bbd936694ee9c06e2023-09-03T05:23:52ZengKorean Academy of Rehabilitation MedicineAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine2234-06452234-06532018-04-0142231332010.5535/arm.2018.42.2.313956Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental DelayYou Gyoung Yi0In Young Sung1Jin Sook Yuk2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, .KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, .KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, .KoreaObjectiveTo compare the scores of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development second edition (BSID-II) and the third edition, Bayley-III, in children with suspected developmental delay and to determine the cutoff score for developmental delay in the Bayley-III.MethodsChildren younger than 42 months (n=62) with suspected developmental delay who visited our department between 2014 and 2015 were assessed with both the BSID-II and Bayley-III tests.ResultsThe mean Bayley-III Cognitive Language Composite (CLC) score was 5.8 points higher than the mean BSID-II Mental Developmental Index (MDI) score, and the mean Bayley-III Motor Composite (MC) score was 7.9 points higher than the mean BSID-II Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) score. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of a BSID-II MDI score <70, Bayley-III CLC scores showed a cutoff of 78.0 (96.6% sensitivity and 93.9% specificity). In ROC analysis of a BSID-II PDI score <70, the Bayley-III MC score showed a cutoff of 80.ConclusionThere was a strong correlation between the BSID-II and Bayley-III in children with suspected developmental delay. The Bayley-III identified fewer children with developmental delay. The recommended cutoff value for developmental delay increased from a BSID-II score of 70 to a Bayley-III CLC score of 78 and Bayley-III MC score of 80.http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-42-313.pdfDevelopmental DisabilitiesBSID-IIBayley-III |
| spellingShingle | You Gyoung Yi In Young Sung Jin Sook Yuk Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental Delay Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine Developmental Disabilities BSID-II Bayley-III |
| title | Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental Delay |
| title_full | Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental Delay |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental Delay |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental Delay |
| title_short | Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental Delay |
| title_sort | comparison of second and third editions of the bayley scales in children with suspected developmental delay |
| topic | Developmental Disabilities BSID-II Bayley-III |
| url | http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-42-313.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yougyoungyi comparisonofsecondandthirdeditionsofthebayleyscalesinchildrenwithsuspecteddevelopmentaldelay AT inyoungsung comparisonofsecondandthirdeditionsofthebayleyscalesinchildrenwithsuspecteddevelopmentaldelay AT jinsookyuk comparisonofsecondandthirdeditionsofthebayleyscalesinchildrenwithsuspecteddevelopmentaldelay |