Bayes Theorem and Protopathic Bias: Methodological Concerns When Addressing the Impact of Fetal Heart Rate Patterns on the Cesarean Section Rate

Over the last 30 years, the caesarean section rate has reached global epidemic proportions. This trend is driven by multiple factors, an important one of which is the use and inconsistent interpretation of the electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) system. Despite its introduction in the 1960s, the EFM h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacques Balayla, Ariane Lasry, Yaron Gil, Alexander Volodarsky-Perel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2020-07-01
Series:American Journal of Perinatology Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1713786
_version_ 1818130757705531392
author Jacques Balayla
Ariane Lasry
Yaron Gil
Alexander Volodarsky-Perel
author_facet Jacques Balayla
Ariane Lasry
Yaron Gil
Alexander Volodarsky-Perel
author_sort Jacques Balayla
collection DOAJ
description Over the last 30 years, the caesarean section rate has reached global epidemic proportions. This trend is driven by multiple factors, an important one of which is the use and inconsistent interpretation of the electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) system. Despite its introduction in the 1960s, the EFM has not definitively improved neonatal outcomes, yet it has since significantly contributed to a seven-fold increase in the caesarean section rate. As we attempt to reduce the caesarean rates in the developed world, we should consider focusing on areas that have garnered little attention in the literature, such as physician sensitization to the poor predictive power of the EFM and the research method biases that are involved in studying the abnormal heart rate patterns—umbilical cord pH relationship. Herein, we apply Bayes theorem to different clinical scenarios to illustrate the poor predictive power of the EFM, as well as shed light on the principle of protopathic bias, which affects the classification of research outcomes among studies addressing the effects of the EFM on caesarean rates. We propose and discuss potential solutions to the aforementioned considerations, which include the re-examination of guidelines with which we interpret fetal heart rate patterns and the development of noninvasive technologies that evaluate fetal pH in real time.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T08:10:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b994acb555ad44a9bb88f96e8df794ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2157-6998
2157-7005
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T08:10:07Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format Article
series American Journal of Perinatology Reports
spelling doaj.art-b994acb555ad44a9bb88f96e8df794ba2022-12-22T01:14:54ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.American Journal of Perinatology Reports2157-69982157-70052020-07-011003e342e34510.1055/s-0040-1713786Bayes Theorem and Protopathic Bias: Methodological Concerns When Addressing the Impact of Fetal Heart Rate Patterns on the Cesarean Section RateJacques Balayla0Ariane Lasry1Yaron Gil2Alexander Volodarsky-Perel3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaOver the last 30 years, the caesarean section rate has reached global epidemic proportions. This trend is driven by multiple factors, an important one of which is the use and inconsistent interpretation of the electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) system. Despite its introduction in the 1960s, the EFM has not definitively improved neonatal outcomes, yet it has since significantly contributed to a seven-fold increase in the caesarean section rate. As we attempt to reduce the caesarean rates in the developed world, we should consider focusing on areas that have garnered little attention in the literature, such as physician sensitization to the poor predictive power of the EFM and the research method biases that are involved in studying the abnormal heart rate patterns—umbilical cord pH relationship. Herein, we apply Bayes theorem to different clinical scenarios to illustrate the poor predictive power of the EFM, as well as shed light on the principle of protopathic bias, which affects the classification of research outcomes among studies addressing the effects of the EFM on caesarean rates. We propose and discuss potential solutions to the aforementioned considerations, which include the re-examination of guidelines with which we interpret fetal heart rate patterns and the development of noninvasive technologies that evaluate fetal pH in real time.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1713786fetal phcaesarean sectionbayes theoremprotopathic bias
spellingShingle Jacques Balayla
Ariane Lasry
Yaron Gil
Alexander Volodarsky-Perel
Bayes Theorem and Protopathic Bias: Methodological Concerns When Addressing the Impact of Fetal Heart Rate Patterns on the Cesarean Section Rate
American Journal of Perinatology Reports
fetal ph
caesarean section
bayes theorem
protopathic bias
title Bayes Theorem and Protopathic Bias: Methodological Concerns When Addressing the Impact of Fetal Heart Rate Patterns on the Cesarean Section Rate
title_full Bayes Theorem and Protopathic Bias: Methodological Concerns When Addressing the Impact of Fetal Heart Rate Patterns on the Cesarean Section Rate
title_fullStr Bayes Theorem and Protopathic Bias: Methodological Concerns When Addressing the Impact of Fetal Heart Rate Patterns on the Cesarean Section Rate
title_full_unstemmed Bayes Theorem and Protopathic Bias: Methodological Concerns When Addressing the Impact of Fetal Heart Rate Patterns on the Cesarean Section Rate
title_short Bayes Theorem and Protopathic Bias: Methodological Concerns When Addressing the Impact of Fetal Heart Rate Patterns on the Cesarean Section Rate
title_sort bayes theorem and protopathic bias methodological concerns when addressing the impact of fetal heart rate patterns on the cesarean section rate
topic fetal ph
caesarean section
bayes theorem
protopathic bias
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1713786
work_keys_str_mv AT jacquesbalayla bayestheoremandprotopathicbiasmethodologicalconcernswhenaddressingtheimpactoffetalheartratepatternsonthecesareansectionrate
AT arianelasry bayestheoremandprotopathicbiasmethodologicalconcernswhenaddressingtheimpactoffetalheartratepatternsonthecesareansectionrate
AT yarongil bayestheoremandprotopathicbiasmethodologicalconcernswhenaddressingtheimpactoffetalheartratepatternsonthecesareansectionrate
AT alexandervolodarskyperel bayestheoremandprotopathicbiasmethodologicalconcernswhenaddressingtheimpactoffetalheartratepatternsonthecesareansectionrate