Pussy Riot as the Trickstar
In his article, Mark Lipovetsky analyses Pussy Riot’s punk-prayer and the public discussion following the event. The author situates Pussy Riot’s performance in the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour as the cultural return to and rebirth of the trickster trope – which was extremely powerful in the Sov...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ces |
| Published: |
Natascha Drubek
2015-06-01
|
| Series: | Apparatus. Film, Media and Digital Cultures of Central and Eastern Europe |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.apparatusjournal.net/index.php/apparatus/article/view/5 |
| _version_ | 1818481144728911872 |
|---|---|
| author | Mark Lipovetsky |
| author_facet | Mark Lipovetsky |
| author_sort | Mark Lipovetsky |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In his article, Mark Lipovetsky analyses Pussy Riot’s punk-prayer and the public discussion following the event. The author situates Pussy Riot’s performance in the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour as the cultural return to and rebirth of the trickster trope – which was extremely powerful in the Soviet period but visibly declined in its cultural significance in post-Soviet times. At the background of this tradition, Pussy Riot represents a rare case of the trickstar (Marylyn Jurich), a female trickster, undermining not only socio-political but first and foremost the gender regime of the society, challenging sexism and gender repression. Analyzing Pussy Riot’s performance and its perception, Lipovetsky’s article argues that the Pussy Riot debate has revealed such flaws in the liberal discourse as the silent equation of moral values with religious doctrines; hierarchical, essentialist and, basically, pre-modern, understanding of culture (rejecting contemporary art for the lack of “harmony”); and, most importantly, the allegiance to patriarchal stereotypes. The shared values that are responsible for these flaws, appear not so different from the conservatives’ rage against “blasphemy” and the assault on the national “spiritual ties” (“dukhovnye skrepy”, to use Putin’s words); aggressive “defence” of “eternal” moral/religious values epitomized by the disgust towards contemporary art. The discourse triggered by Pussy Riot within the liberal intelligentsia reveal the hypocrisy of the liberal opposition, which supported “girls” only as the irritant to their enemies, while not so secretly despising them as silly manipulated puppets who should be physically punished for their shameful transgression. Furthermore, this debate laid bare the responsibility of neo-traditionalist ideology, shared by many representatives of liberal intelligentsia, for the Putin regime’s ideology.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T11:31:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b9af4c34c91c458e8d7c87b84e21898d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2365-7758 |
| language | ces |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T11:31:04Z |
| publishDate | 2015-06-01 |
| publisher | Natascha Drubek |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Apparatus. Film, Media and Digital Cultures of Central and Eastern Europe |
| spelling | doaj.art-b9af4c34c91c458e8d7c87b84e21898d2022-12-22T01:50:36ZcesNatascha DrubekApparatus. Film, Media and Digital Cultures of Central and Eastern Europe2365-77582015-06-01110.17892/app.2015.0001.55Pussy Riot as the TrickstarMark Lipovetsky0U of Colorado In his article, Mark Lipovetsky analyses Pussy Riot’s punk-prayer and the public discussion following the event. The author situates Pussy Riot’s performance in the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour as the cultural return to and rebirth of the trickster trope – which was extremely powerful in the Soviet period but visibly declined in its cultural significance in post-Soviet times. At the background of this tradition, Pussy Riot represents a rare case of the trickstar (Marylyn Jurich), a female trickster, undermining not only socio-political but first and foremost the gender regime of the society, challenging sexism and gender repression. Analyzing Pussy Riot’s performance and its perception, Lipovetsky’s article argues that the Pussy Riot debate has revealed such flaws in the liberal discourse as the silent equation of moral values with religious doctrines; hierarchical, essentialist and, basically, pre-modern, understanding of culture (rejecting contemporary art for the lack of “harmony”); and, most importantly, the allegiance to patriarchal stereotypes. The shared values that are responsible for these flaws, appear not so different from the conservatives’ rage against “blasphemy” and the assault on the national “spiritual ties” (“dukhovnye skrepy”, to use Putin’s words); aggressive “defence” of “eternal” moral/religious values epitomized by the disgust towards contemporary art. The discourse triggered by Pussy Riot within the liberal intelligentsia reveal the hypocrisy of the liberal opposition, which supported “girls” only as the irritant to their enemies, while not so secretly despising them as silly manipulated puppets who should be physically punished for their shameful transgression. Furthermore, this debate laid bare the responsibility of neo-traditionalist ideology, shared by many representatives of liberal intelligentsia, for the Putin regime’s ideology. https://www.apparatusjournal.net/index.php/apparatus/article/view/5Pussy RiotRussiaMoscowfeminismtrickstertrickstar |
| spellingShingle | Mark Lipovetsky Pussy Riot as the Trickstar Apparatus. Film, Media and Digital Cultures of Central and Eastern Europe Pussy Riot Russia Moscow feminism trickster trickstar |
| title | Pussy Riot as the Trickstar |
| title_full | Pussy Riot as the Trickstar |
| title_fullStr | Pussy Riot as the Trickstar |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pussy Riot as the Trickstar |
| title_short | Pussy Riot as the Trickstar |
| title_sort | pussy riot as the trickstar |
| topic | Pussy Riot Russia Moscow feminism trickster trickstar |
| url | https://www.apparatusjournal.net/index.php/apparatus/article/view/5 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marklipovetsky pussyriotasthetrickstar |