Entering social work studies: who, why and how
The results of higher education depend on various factors of which one of the most important is students, especially in the field of social work. The process of study entrance is often modeled as a rational choice; however, there are other ways to enter higher education. The action theory developed...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Vytautas Magnus University
2020-10-01
|
| Series: | Socialinis Darbas: Patirtis ir Metodai |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/111322/1/ISSN2029-5820_2020_N_25_1.PG_67-92.pdf |
| _version_ | 1827842211616653312 |
|---|---|
| author | Dunajevas, Eugenijus Buzaitytė-Kašalynienė, Jolita |
| author_facet | Dunajevas, Eugenijus Buzaitytė-Kašalynienė, Jolita |
| author_sort | Dunajevas, Eugenijus |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The results of higher education depend on various factors of which one of the most important is students, especially in the field of social work. The process of study entrance is often modeled as a rational choice; however, there are other ways to enter higher education. The action theory developed by Jon Elster is used to conceptualize the possible ways to enter studies: as a result there are at least five possible ways to enter social work. In order to explore the variance of students who represent the different ways, secondary data analysis was used. Qualitative and quantitative data analysis methods were employed. The data analysis results suggest that there are at least four ways to enter social work: rational choice, bounded rationality, weakness of will and single alternative. In spite of popular view that students are guided by rational choice, the results show that rational choice group students compose the smallest part of all. Also, quantitative analysis was conducted in order to find out the variable that best differentiates the student groups. It was found that the “variety of activities in social work” as a factor to enter social work studies was the best variable to differentiate students by the way they enter social work studies. The more it is important for those who enter social work studies that there is plenty of action in social work, the more rational, autonomous, and informed they are; and vice versa. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T08:05:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b9b7fbdc956d406bb2d2a1305a27060a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2029-0470 2029-5820 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T08:05:13Z |
| publishDate | 2020-10-01 |
| publisher | Vytautas Magnus University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Socialinis Darbas: Patirtis ir Metodai |
| spelling | doaj.art-b9b7fbdc956d406bb2d2a1305a27060a2023-09-02T19:36:06ZengVytautas Magnus UniversitySocialinis Darbas: Patirtis ir Metodai2029-04702029-58202020-10-01125679110.7220/2029-5820.25.1.4Entering social work studies: who, why and howDunajevas, Eugenijus0Buzaitytė-Kašalynienė, Jolita1Vilnius UniversityVilnius UniversityThe results of higher education depend on various factors of which one of the most important is students, especially in the field of social work. The process of study entrance is often modeled as a rational choice; however, there are other ways to enter higher education. The action theory developed by Jon Elster is used to conceptualize the possible ways to enter studies: as a result there are at least five possible ways to enter social work. In order to explore the variance of students who represent the different ways, secondary data analysis was used. Qualitative and quantitative data analysis methods were employed. The data analysis results suggest that there are at least four ways to enter social work: rational choice, bounded rationality, weakness of will and single alternative. In spite of popular view that students are guided by rational choice, the results show that rational choice group students compose the smallest part of all. Also, quantitative analysis was conducted in order to find out the variable that best differentiates the student groups. It was found that the “variety of activities in social work” as a factor to enter social work studies was the best variable to differentiate students by the way they enter social work studies. The more it is important for those who enter social work studies that there is plenty of action in social work, the more rational, autonomous, and informed they are; and vice versa.https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/111322/1/ISSN2029-5820_2020_N_25_1.PG_67-92.pdfbounded rationalityrational choiceweakness of willsocial worksingle alternative |
| spellingShingle | Dunajevas, Eugenijus Buzaitytė-Kašalynienė, Jolita Entering social work studies: who, why and how Socialinis Darbas: Patirtis ir Metodai bounded rationality rational choice weakness of will social work single alternative |
| title | Entering social work studies: who, why and how |
| title_full | Entering social work studies: who, why and how |
| title_fullStr | Entering social work studies: who, why and how |
| title_full_unstemmed | Entering social work studies: who, why and how |
| title_short | Entering social work studies: who, why and how |
| title_sort | entering social work studies who why and how |
| topic | bounded rationality rational choice weakness of will social work single alternative |
| url | https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/111322/1/ISSN2029-5820_2020_N_25_1.PG_67-92.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dunajevaseugenijus enteringsocialworkstudieswhowhyandhow AT buzaitytekasalynienejolita enteringsocialworkstudieswhowhyandhow |