Cet obscur objet d’un désir contrarié
This paper revisits the tensions between conservation-restoration and archaeology through the common subject of their practice: the object. A brief overview of the history of the relations between these two disciplines, originally associated, suggests that it is the change in the heuristic status of...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/nda/11540 |
_version_ | 1818846779396849664 |
---|---|
author | Ludovic Coupaye Olivier Labat Sébastien Ziegler |
author_facet | Ludovic Coupaye Olivier Labat Sébastien Ziegler |
author_sort | Ludovic Coupaye |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper revisits the tensions between conservation-restoration and archaeology through the common subject of their practice: the object. A brief overview of the history of the relations between these two disciplines, originally associated, suggests that it is the change in the heuristic status of the object that led to a division of the tasks. Whilst archaeology tends to submit the materiality of the object to issues of contexts and environments, giving it the role of a prompts for interpretations, conservation tends to approach the object as a bundle of material indexes. This division between the construction of historical discourses and material production of knowledge ends up giving the work of conservation a subaltern position. Instead, the paper suggests that conservators, in addition to restoring the object materially, also restore the centrality of its materiality in the production of archaeological knowledge. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T05:50:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b9c9c25fa7074deeb7e885254f1a1ce3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0242-7702 2425-1941 |
language | fra |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T05:50:58Z |
publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
publisher | Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme |
record_format | Article |
series | Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie |
spelling | doaj.art-b9c9c25fa7074deeb7e885254f1a1ce32022-12-21T20:33:37ZfraEditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'HommeLes Nouvelles de l’Archéologie0242-77022425-19412021-03-01162364010.4000/nda.11540Cet obscur objet d’un désir contrariéLudovic CoupayeOlivier LabatSébastien ZieglerThis paper revisits the tensions between conservation-restoration and archaeology through the common subject of their practice: the object. A brief overview of the history of the relations between these two disciplines, originally associated, suggests that it is the change in the heuristic status of the object that led to a division of the tasks. Whilst archaeology tends to submit the materiality of the object to issues of contexts and environments, giving it the role of a prompts for interpretations, conservation tends to approach the object as a bundle of material indexes. This division between the construction of historical discourses and material production of knowledge ends up giving the work of conservation a subaltern position. Instead, the paper suggests that conservators, in addition to restoring the object materially, also restore the centrality of its materiality in the production of archaeological knowledge.http://journals.openedition.org/nda/11540conservation-restorationobjectmaterialityobjects biographyhistoriographysemiotics |
spellingShingle | Ludovic Coupaye Olivier Labat Sébastien Ziegler Cet obscur objet d’un désir contrarié Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie conservation-restoration object materiality objects biography historiography semiotics |
title | Cet obscur objet d’un désir contrarié |
title_full | Cet obscur objet d’un désir contrarié |
title_fullStr | Cet obscur objet d’un désir contrarié |
title_full_unstemmed | Cet obscur objet d’un désir contrarié |
title_short | Cet obscur objet d’un désir contrarié |
title_sort | cet obscur objet d un desir contrarie |
topic | conservation-restoration object materiality objects biography historiography semiotics |
url | http://journals.openedition.org/nda/11540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ludoviccoupaye cetobscurobjetdundesircontrarie AT olivierlabat cetobscurobjetdundesircontrarie AT sebastienziegler cetobscurobjetdundesircontrarie |