The efficacy of sagittal cervical spine subtyping: Investigating radiological classification methods within 150 asymptomatic participants

Aims: The aim of this study is to (1) compare and contrast cervical subtype classification methods within an asymptomatic population, and (2) identify inter-methodological consistencies and describe examples of inconsistencies that have the potential to affect subtype classification and clinical dec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee Daffin, Max C Stuelcken, Mark G L Sayers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2017;volume=8;issue=3;spage=231;epage=238;aulast=Daffin
_version_ 1818192442993672192
author Lee Daffin
Max C Stuelcken
Mark G L Sayers
author_facet Lee Daffin
Max C Stuelcken
Mark G L Sayers
author_sort Lee Daffin
collection DOAJ
description Aims: The aim of this study is to (1) compare and contrast cervical subtype classification methods within an asymptomatic population, and (2) identify inter-methodological consistencies and describe examples of inconsistencies that have the potential to affect subtype classification and clinical decision-making. Methods: A total of 150 asymptomatic 18–30-year-old participants met the strict inclusion criteria. An erect neutral lateral radiograph was obtained using standard procedures. The Centroid, modified Takeshima/Herbst methods and the relative rotation angles in cases of nonagreement were used to determine subtype classifications. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) was used to assess the level of agreement between the two methods. Results: Nonlordotic classifications represented 66% of the cohort. Subtype classification identified the cohort as, lordosis (51), straight (37), global kyphosis (30), sigmoidal (13), and reverse sigmoidal (RS) (19). Cohen's kappa coefficient indicated that there was only a moderate level of agreement between methods (κ = 0.531). Methodological agreement tended to be higher within the lordotic and global kyphotic subtypes whereas, straight, sigmoidal, and RS subtypes demonstrated less agreement. Conclusion: This is the first study of its type to compare and contrast cervical classification methods. Subtypes displaying predominantly extended or flexed segments demonstrated higher levels of agreement. Our findings highlight the need for establishing a standardized multi-method approach to classify sagittal cervical subtypes.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T00:30:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b9cd21c99753445e8ffa06b75cab4950
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-8237
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T00:30:35Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
spelling doaj.art-b9cd21c99753445e8ffa06b75cab49502022-12-22T00:44:29ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine0974-82372017-01-018323123810.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_84_17The efficacy of sagittal cervical spine subtyping: Investigating radiological classification methods within 150 asymptomatic participantsLee DaffinMax C StuelckenMark G L SayersAims: The aim of this study is to (1) compare and contrast cervical subtype classification methods within an asymptomatic population, and (2) identify inter-methodological consistencies and describe examples of inconsistencies that have the potential to affect subtype classification and clinical decision-making. Methods: A total of 150 asymptomatic 18–30-year-old participants met the strict inclusion criteria. An erect neutral lateral radiograph was obtained using standard procedures. The Centroid, modified Takeshima/Herbst methods and the relative rotation angles in cases of nonagreement were used to determine subtype classifications. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) was used to assess the level of agreement between the two methods. Results: Nonlordotic classifications represented 66% of the cohort. Subtype classification identified the cohort as, lordosis (51), straight (37), global kyphosis (30), sigmoidal (13), and reverse sigmoidal (RS) (19). Cohen's kappa coefficient indicated that there was only a moderate level of agreement between methods (κ = 0.531). Methodological agreement tended to be higher within the lordotic and global kyphotic subtypes whereas, straight, sigmoidal, and RS subtypes demonstrated less agreement. Conclusion: This is the first study of its type to compare and contrast cervical classification methods. Subtypes displaying predominantly extended or flexed segments demonstrated higher levels of agreement. Our findings highlight the need for establishing a standardized multi-method approach to classify sagittal cervical subtypes.http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2017;volume=8;issue=3;spage=231;epage=238;aulast=DaffinAsymptomaticcervical classificationkyphosislordosissigmoidal
spellingShingle Lee Daffin
Max C Stuelcken
Mark G L Sayers
The efficacy of sagittal cervical spine subtyping: Investigating radiological classification methods within 150 asymptomatic participants
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Asymptomatic
cervical classification
kyphosis
lordosis
sigmoidal
title The efficacy of sagittal cervical spine subtyping: Investigating radiological classification methods within 150 asymptomatic participants
title_full The efficacy of sagittal cervical spine subtyping: Investigating radiological classification methods within 150 asymptomatic participants
title_fullStr The efficacy of sagittal cervical spine subtyping: Investigating radiological classification methods within 150 asymptomatic participants
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of sagittal cervical spine subtyping: Investigating radiological classification methods within 150 asymptomatic participants
title_short The efficacy of sagittal cervical spine subtyping: Investigating radiological classification methods within 150 asymptomatic participants
title_sort efficacy of sagittal cervical spine subtyping investigating radiological classification methods within 150 asymptomatic participants
topic Asymptomatic
cervical classification
kyphosis
lordosis
sigmoidal
url http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2017;volume=8;issue=3;spage=231;epage=238;aulast=Daffin
work_keys_str_mv AT leedaffin theefficacyofsagittalcervicalspinesubtypinginvestigatingradiologicalclassificationmethodswithin150asymptomaticparticipants
AT maxcstuelcken theefficacyofsagittalcervicalspinesubtypinginvestigatingradiologicalclassificationmethodswithin150asymptomaticparticipants
AT markglsayers theefficacyofsagittalcervicalspinesubtypinginvestigatingradiologicalclassificationmethodswithin150asymptomaticparticipants
AT leedaffin efficacyofsagittalcervicalspinesubtypinginvestigatingradiologicalclassificationmethodswithin150asymptomaticparticipants
AT maxcstuelcken efficacyofsagittalcervicalspinesubtypinginvestigatingradiologicalclassificationmethodswithin150asymptomaticparticipants
AT markglsayers efficacyofsagittalcervicalspinesubtypinginvestigatingradiologicalclassificationmethodswithin150asymptomaticparticipants