Ammonia sources and sinks in an intensively managed grassland canopy

Grasslands represent canopies with a complex structure where sources and sinks of ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) may coexist at the plant level. Moreover, management practices such as mowing, hay production and grazing may change the composition of the sward and hence the sourc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. David, B. Loubet, P. Cellier, M. Mattsson, J. K. Schjoerring, E. Nemitz, R. Roche, M. Riedo, M. A. Sutton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2009-09-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:http://www.biogeosciences.net/6/1903/2009/bg-6-1903-2009.pdf
_version_ 1818759969165541376
author M. David
B. Loubet
P. Cellier
M. Mattsson
J. K. Schjoerring
E. Nemitz
R. Roche
M. Riedo
M. A. Sutton
author_facet M. David
B. Loubet
P. Cellier
M. Mattsson
J. K. Schjoerring
E. Nemitz
R. Roche
M. Riedo
M. A. Sutton
author_sort M. David
collection DOAJ
description Grasslands represent canopies with a complex structure where sources and sinks of ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) may coexist at the plant level. Moreover, management practices such as mowing, hay production and grazing may change the composition of the sward and hence the source-sink relationship at the canopy level as well as the interaction with the atmosphere. There is therefore a need to understand the exchange of ammonia between grasslands and the atmosphere better, especially regarding the location and magnitude of sources and sinks. <br><br> Fluxes of atmospheric NH<sub>3</sub> within a grassland canopy were assessed in the field and under controlled conditions using a dynamic chamber technique (cuvette). These cuvette measurements were combined with extraction techniques to estimate the ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) concentration and the pH of a given part of the plant or soil, leading to an estimated ammonia compensation point (<I>C<sub>p</sub></I>). The combination of the cuvette and the extraction techniques was used to identify the potential sources and sinks of NH<sub>3</sub> within the different compartments of the grassland: the soil, the litter or senescent "litter leaves", and the functioning "green leaves". A set of six field experiments and six laboratory experiments were performed in which the different compartments were either added or removed from the cuvettes. <br><br> The results show that the cuvette measurements agree with the extraction technique in ranking the strength of compartment sources. It suggests that in the studied grassland the green leaves were mostly a sink for NH<sub>3</sub> with a compensation point around 0.1–0.4 μg m<sup>−3</sup> and an NH<sub>3</sub> flux of 6 to 7 ng m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. Cutting of the grass did not increase the NH<sub>3</sub> fluxes of the green leaves. The litter was found to be the largest source of NH<sub>3</sub> in the canopy, with a <I>C<sub>p</sub></I> of up to 1000 μg m<sup>−3</sup> NH<sub>3</sub> and an NH<sub>3</sub> flux up to 90 ng m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. The litter was found to be a much smaller NH<sub>3</sub> source when dried (<I>C<sub>p</sub></I>=160 μg m<sup>−3</sup> and <I>F</I><sub>NH3</sub>=35 ng m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> NH<sub>3</sub>). Moreover emissions from the litter were found to vary with the relative humidity of the air. The soil was a strong source of NH<sub>3</sub> in the period immediately after cutting (<I>C<sub>p</sub></I>=320 μg m<sup>−3</sup> and <I>F</I><sub>NH3</sub>=60 ng m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), which was nevertheless always smaller than the litter source. The soil NH<sub>3</sub> emissions lasted, however, for less than one day, and were not observed with sieved soil. They could not be solely explained by xylem sap flow extruding NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>. These results indicate that future research on grassland-ammonia relationships should focus on the post-mowing period and the role of litter in interaction with meteorological conditions.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T06:51:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b9d16523056044f7b78b8fef584241f5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T06:51:10Z
publishDate 2009-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-b9d16523056044f7b78b8fef584241f52022-12-21T21:17:19ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892009-09-016919031915Ammonia sources and sinks in an intensively managed grassland canopyM. DavidB. LoubetP. CellierM. MattssonJ. K. SchjoerringE. NemitzR. RocheM. RiedoM. A. SuttonGrasslands represent canopies with a complex structure where sources and sinks of ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) may coexist at the plant level. Moreover, management practices such as mowing, hay production and grazing may change the composition of the sward and hence the source-sink relationship at the canopy level as well as the interaction with the atmosphere. There is therefore a need to understand the exchange of ammonia between grasslands and the atmosphere better, especially regarding the location and magnitude of sources and sinks. <br><br> Fluxes of atmospheric NH<sub>3</sub> within a grassland canopy were assessed in the field and under controlled conditions using a dynamic chamber technique (cuvette). These cuvette measurements were combined with extraction techniques to estimate the ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) concentration and the pH of a given part of the plant or soil, leading to an estimated ammonia compensation point (<I>C<sub>p</sub></I>). The combination of the cuvette and the extraction techniques was used to identify the potential sources and sinks of NH<sub>3</sub> within the different compartments of the grassland: the soil, the litter or senescent "litter leaves", and the functioning "green leaves". A set of six field experiments and six laboratory experiments were performed in which the different compartments were either added or removed from the cuvettes. <br><br> The results show that the cuvette measurements agree with the extraction technique in ranking the strength of compartment sources. It suggests that in the studied grassland the green leaves were mostly a sink for NH<sub>3</sub> with a compensation point around 0.1–0.4 μg m<sup>−3</sup> and an NH<sub>3</sub> flux of 6 to 7 ng m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. Cutting of the grass did not increase the NH<sub>3</sub> fluxes of the green leaves. The litter was found to be the largest source of NH<sub>3</sub> in the canopy, with a <I>C<sub>p</sub></I> of up to 1000 μg m<sup>−3</sup> NH<sub>3</sub> and an NH<sub>3</sub> flux up to 90 ng m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. The litter was found to be a much smaller NH<sub>3</sub> source when dried (<I>C<sub>p</sub></I>=160 μg m<sup>−3</sup> and <I>F</I><sub>NH3</sub>=35 ng m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> NH<sub>3</sub>). Moreover emissions from the litter were found to vary with the relative humidity of the air. The soil was a strong source of NH<sub>3</sub> in the period immediately after cutting (<I>C<sub>p</sub></I>=320 μg m<sup>−3</sup> and <I>F</I><sub>NH3</sub>=60 ng m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), which was nevertheless always smaller than the litter source. The soil NH<sub>3</sub> emissions lasted, however, for less than one day, and were not observed with sieved soil. They could not be solely explained by xylem sap flow extruding NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>. These results indicate that future research on grassland-ammonia relationships should focus on the post-mowing period and the role of litter in interaction with meteorological conditions.http://www.biogeosciences.net/6/1903/2009/bg-6-1903-2009.pdf
spellingShingle M. David
B. Loubet
P. Cellier
M. Mattsson
J. K. Schjoerring
E. Nemitz
R. Roche
M. Riedo
M. A. Sutton
Ammonia sources and sinks in an intensively managed grassland canopy
Biogeosciences
title Ammonia sources and sinks in an intensively managed grassland canopy
title_full Ammonia sources and sinks in an intensively managed grassland canopy
title_fullStr Ammonia sources and sinks in an intensively managed grassland canopy
title_full_unstemmed Ammonia sources and sinks in an intensively managed grassland canopy
title_short Ammonia sources and sinks in an intensively managed grassland canopy
title_sort ammonia sources and sinks in an intensively managed grassland canopy
url http://www.biogeosciences.net/6/1903/2009/bg-6-1903-2009.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mdavid ammoniasourcesandsinksinanintensivelymanagedgrasslandcanopy
AT bloubet ammoniasourcesandsinksinanintensivelymanagedgrasslandcanopy
AT pcellier ammoniasourcesandsinksinanintensivelymanagedgrasslandcanopy
AT mmattsson ammoniasourcesandsinksinanintensivelymanagedgrasslandcanopy
AT jkschjoerring ammoniasourcesandsinksinanintensivelymanagedgrasslandcanopy
AT enemitz ammoniasourcesandsinksinanintensivelymanagedgrasslandcanopy
AT rroche ammoniasourcesandsinksinanintensivelymanagedgrasslandcanopy
AT mriedo ammoniasourcesandsinksinanintensivelymanagedgrasslandcanopy
AT masutton ammoniasourcesandsinksinanintensivelymanagedgrasslandcanopy