The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)

Background: The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) established the efficacy of bariatric surgery as compared to a community weight management intervention in reducing intracranial pressure in active IIH. The aim of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to evaluate the economic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Magda Aguiar, Emma Frew, Susan P. Mollan, James L. Mitchell, Ryan S. Ottridge, Zerin Alimajstorovic, Andreas Yiangou, Rishi Singhal, Abd A. Tahrani, Alex J. Sinclair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Life
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/5/409
_version_ 1797535726735196160
author Magda Aguiar
Emma Frew
Susan P. Mollan
James L. Mitchell
Ryan S. Ottridge
Zerin Alimajstorovic
Andreas Yiangou
Rishi Singhal
Abd A. Tahrani
Alex J. Sinclair
author_facet Magda Aguiar
Emma Frew
Susan P. Mollan
James L. Mitchell
Ryan S. Ottridge
Zerin Alimajstorovic
Andreas Yiangou
Rishi Singhal
Abd A. Tahrani
Alex J. Sinclair
author_sort Magda Aguiar
collection DOAJ
description Background: The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) established the efficacy of bariatric surgery as compared to a community weight management intervention in reducing intracranial pressure in active IIH. The aim of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to evaluate the economic impact of these weight loss treatments for IIH. Methods: IIH:WT was a five-year randomised, controlled, parallel group, multicentre trial in the United Kingdom, where participants with active IIH and a body mass index ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive access to bariatric surgery or a community weight management intervention. All clinical and quality of life data was recorded at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Economic evaluation was performed to assess health-care costs and cost-effectiveness. Evaluations were established on an intention to treat principle, followed by a sensitivity analysis using a per protocol analysis. Results: The mean total health care costs were GBP 1353 for the community weight management arm and GBP 5400 for the bariatric surgery arm over 24 months. The majority of costs for the bariatric surgery arm relate to the surgical procedure itself. The 85% who underwent bariatric surgery achieved a 12.5% reduction in intracranial pressure at 24 months as compared to 39% in the community weight management arm; a mean difference of 45% in favour of bariatric surgery. The cost effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time. Conclusions: The IIH:WT was the first to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery with community weight management interventions in the setting of a randomised control trial. The cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time and therefore the incremental cost of surgery when offset against the incremental reduction of intracranial pressure improved after 24 months, as compared with 12 months follow up.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T11:48:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b9f56e8cbb674fad96650ecedc0eb763
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-1729
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T11:48:28Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Life
spelling doaj.art-b9f56e8cbb674fad96650ecedc0eb7632023-11-21T17:53:17ZengMDPI AGLife2075-17292021-04-0111540910.3390/life11050409The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)Magda Aguiar0Emma Frew1Susan P. Mollan2James L. Mitchell3Ryan S. Ottridge4Zerin Alimajstorovic5Andreas Yiangou6Rishi Singhal7Abd A. Tahrani8Alex J. Sinclair9Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B12 2TT, UKHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B12 2TT, UKBirmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, UKInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKUpper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, UKInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKBackground: The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) established the efficacy of bariatric surgery as compared to a community weight management intervention in reducing intracranial pressure in active IIH. The aim of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to evaluate the economic impact of these weight loss treatments for IIH. Methods: IIH:WT was a five-year randomised, controlled, parallel group, multicentre trial in the United Kingdom, where participants with active IIH and a body mass index ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive access to bariatric surgery or a community weight management intervention. All clinical and quality of life data was recorded at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Economic evaluation was performed to assess health-care costs and cost-effectiveness. Evaluations were established on an intention to treat principle, followed by a sensitivity analysis using a per protocol analysis. Results: The mean total health care costs were GBP 1353 for the community weight management arm and GBP 5400 for the bariatric surgery arm over 24 months. The majority of costs for the bariatric surgery arm relate to the surgical procedure itself. The 85% who underwent bariatric surgery achieved a 12.5% reduction in intracranial pressure at 24 months as compared to 39% in the community weight management arm; a mean difference of 45% in favour of bariatric surgery. The cost effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time. Conclusions: The IIH:WT was the first to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery with community weight management interventions in the setting of a randomised control trial. The cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time and therefore the incremental cost of surgery when offset against the incremental reduction of intracranial pressure improved after 24 months, as compared with 12 months follow up.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/5/409bariatric surgerycost-effectivenessheadachehealth care systemintracranial pressurenational health service
spellingShingle Magda Aguiar
Emma Frew
Susan P. Mollan
James L. Mitchell
Ryan S. Ottridge
Zerin Alimajstorovic
Andreas Yiangou
Rishi Singhal
Abd A. Tahrani
Alex J. Sinclair
The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)
Life
bariatric surgery
cost-effectiveness
headache
health care system
intracranial pressure
national health service
title The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)
title_full The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)
title_fullStr The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)
title_full_unstemmed The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)
title_short The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)
title_sort health economic evaluation of bariatric surgery versus a community weight management intervention analysis from the idiopathic intracranial hypertension weight trial iih wt
topic bariatric surgery
cost-effectiveness
headache
health care system
intracranial pressure
national health service
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/5/409
work_keys_str_mv AT magdaaguiar thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT emmafrew thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT susanpmollan thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT jameslmitchell thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT ryansottridge thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT zerinalimajstorovic thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT andreasyiangou thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT rishisinghal thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT abdatahrani thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT alexjsinclair thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT magdaaguiar healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT emmafrew healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT susanpmollan healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT jameslmitchell healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT ryansottridge healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT zerinalimajstorovic healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT andreasyiangou healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT rishisinghal healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT abdatahrani healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt
AT alexjsinclair healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt