The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)
Background: The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) established the efficacy of bariatric surgery as compared to a community weight management intervention in reducing intracranial pressure in active IIH. The aim of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to evaluate the economic...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Life |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/5/409 |
_version_ | 1797535726735196160 |
---|---|
author | Magda Aguiar Emma Frew Susan P. Mollan James L. Mitchell Ryan S. Ottridge Zerin Alimajstorovic Andreas Yiangou Rishi Singhal Abd A. Tahrani Alex J. Sinclair |
author_facet | Magda Aguiar Emma Frew Susan P. Mollan James L. Mitchell Ryan S. Ottridge Zerin Alimajstorovic Andreas Yiangou Rishi Singhal Abd A. Tahrani Alex J. Sinclair |
author_sort | Magda Aguiar |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) established the efficacy of bariatric surgery as compared to a community weight management intervention in reducing intracranial pressure in active IIH. The aim of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to evaluate the economic impact of these weight loss treatments for IIH. Methods: IIH:WT was a five-year randomised, controlled, parallel group, multicentre trial in the United Kingdom, where participants with active IIH and a body mass index ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive access to bariatric surgery or a community weight management intervention. All clinical and quality of life data was recorded at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Economic evaluation was performed to assess health-care costs and cost-effectiveness. Evaluations were established on an intention to treat principle, followed by a sensitivity analysis using a per protocol analysis. Results: The mean total health care costs were GBP 1353 for the community weight management arm and GBP 5400 for the bariatric surgery arm over 24 months. The majority of costs for the bariatric surgery arm relate to the surgical procedure itself. The 85% who underwent bariatric surgery achieved a 12.5% reduction in intracranial pressure at 24 months as compared to 39% in the community weight management arm; a mean difference of 45% in favour of bariatric surgery. The cost effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time. Conclusions: The IIH:WT was the first to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery with community weight management interventions in the setting of a randomised control trial. The cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time and therefore the incremental cost of surgery when offset against the incremental reduction of intracranial pressure improved after 24 months, as compared with 12 months follow up. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T11:48:28Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b9f56e8cbb674fad96650ecedc0eb763 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-1729 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T11:48:28Z |
publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Life |
spelling | doaj.art-b9f56e8cbb674fad96650ecedc0eb7632023-11-21T17:53:17ZengMDPI AGLife2075-17292021-04-0111540910.3390/life11050409The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)Magda Aguiar0Emma Frew1Susan P. Mollan2James L. Mitchell3Ryan S. Ottridge4Zerin Alimajstorovic5Andreas Yiangou6Rishi Singhal7Abd A. Tahrani8Alex J. Sinclair9Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B12 2TT, UKHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B12 2TT, UKBirmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, UKInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKUpper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, UKInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKBackground: The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) established the efficacy of bariatric surgery as compared to a community weight management intervention in reducing intracranial pressure in active IIH. The aim of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to evaluate the economic impact of these weight loss treatments for IIH. Methods: IIH:WT was a five-year randomised, controlled, parallel group, multicentre trial in the United Kingdom, where participants with active IIH and a body mass index ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive access to bariatric surgery or a community weight management intervention. All clinical and quality of life data was recorded at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Economic evaluation was performed to assess health-care costs and cost-effectiveness. Evaluations were established on an intention to treat principle, followed by a sensitivity analysis using a per protocol analysis. Results: The mean total health care costs were GBP 1353 for the community weight management arm and GBP 5400 for the bariatric surgery arm over 24 months. The majority of costs for the bariatric surgery arm relate to the surgical procedure itself. The 85% who underwent bariatric surgery achieved a 12.5% reduction in intracranial pressure at 24 months as compared to 39% in the community weight management arm; a mean difference of 45% in favour of bariatric surgery. The cost effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time. Conclusions: The IIH:WT was the first to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery with community weight management interventions in the setting of a randomised control trial. The cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time and therefore the incremental cost of surgery when offset against the incremental reduction of intracranial pressure improved after 24 months, as compared with 12 months follow up.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/5/409bariatric surgerycost-effectivenessheadachehealth care systemintracranial pressurenational health service |
spellingShingle | Magda Aguiar Emma Frew Susan P. Mollan James L. Mitchell Ryan S. Ottridge Zerin Alimajstorovic Andreas Yiangou Rishi Singhal Abd A. Tahrani Alex J. Sinclair The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) Life bariatric surgery cost-effectiveness headache health care system intracranial pressure national health service |
title | The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) |
title_full | The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) |
title_fullStr | The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) |
title_full_unstemmed | The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) |
title_short | The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) |
title_sort | health economic evaluation of bariatric surgery versus a community weight management intervention analysis from the idiopathic intracranial hypertension weight trial iih wt |
topic | bariatric surgery cost-effectiveness headache health care system intracranial pressure national health service |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/5/409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT magdaaguiar thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT emmafrew thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT susanpmollan thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT jameslmitchell thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT ryansottridge thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT zerinalimajstorovic thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT andreasyiangou thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT rishisinghal thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT abdatahrani thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT alexjsinclair thehealtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT magdaaguiar healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT emmafrew healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT susanpmollan healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT jameslmitchell healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT ryansottridge healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT zerinalimajstorovic healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT andreasyiangou healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT rishisinghal healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT abdatahrani healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt AT alexjsinclair healtheconomicevaluationofbariatricsurgeryversusacommunityweightmanagementinterventionanalysisfromtheidiopathicintracranialhypertensionweighttrialiihwt |