Sex‐Based Differences in the Performance of the HEART Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain

BackgroundSex‐based differences in clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and outcomes of patients with acute chest pain are increasingly being recognized, but are not implemented in guidelines and clinical prediction tools. We evaluated the performance of the HEART score in women versus men, becau...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ingrid E. M. Bank, Vince C. de Hoog, Dominique P. V. de Kleijn, Gerard Pasterkamp, Pieter A. Doevendans, Hester M. den Ruijter, Geertje Dalmeijer, Thierry X. Wildbergh, Arend Mosterd, Leo Timmers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-11-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.116.005373
_version_ 1811328985361022976
author Ingrid E. M. Bank
Vince C. de Hoog
Dominique P. V. de Kleijn
Gerard Pasterkamp
Pieter A. Doevendans
Hester M. den Ruijter
Geertje Dalmeijer
Thierry X. Wildbergh
Arend Mosterd
Leo Timmers
author_facet Ingrid E. M. Bank
Vince C. de Hoog
Dominique P. V. de Kleijn
Gerard Pasterkamp
Pieter A. Doevendans
Hester M. den Ruijter
Geertje Dalmeijer
Thierry X. Wildbergh
Arend Mosterd
Leo Timmers
author_sort Ingrid E. M. Bank
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundSex‐based differences in clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and outcomes of patients with acute chest pain are increasingly being recognized, but are not implemented in guidelines and clinical prediction tools. We evaluated the performance of the HEART score in women versus men, because sex‐based differences may exist among the algorithm's components: history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and admission troponin level. Methods and ResultsThe HEART score was retrospectively assessed in 831 women and 1084 men presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain, assigning patients to the low‐, intermediate‐, or high‐risk category for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6 weeks. MACE, consisting of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and all‐cause death, also included events during index visit. Six‐week MACE rates were 2 times lower in women than men (10.0% versus 20.8%; P<0.01). Despite similar discriminatory accuracy of the HEART score among women and men (c‐statistic, 0.80 [0.75–0.84] versus 0.77 [0.74–0.81]; P=0.43), 6‐week MACE rates were significantly lower in women than men across all HEART risk categories: 2.1% versus 6.5% (P<0.01) in the low‐risk category, 12.7% versus 21.3% (P<0.01) in intermediate‐risk category, and 53.1% versus 77.0% (P=0.02) in the high‐risk category. The HEART score‐adjusted risk ratio for men was 1.6 (1.3–2.0; P<0.01). ConclusionsThe markedly higher 6‐week MACE risk in men across all HEART risk categories should be taken into account when using the HEART score to guide clinical decision making; early discharge with a low‐risk HEART score appears less safe for men than women with acute chest pain.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T15:35:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b9fb94f768e44ab4a09691f1ff339352
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T15:35:47Z
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-b9fb94f768e44ab4a09691f1ff3393522022-12-22T02:41:17ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802017-11-016610.1161/JAHA.116.005373Sex‐Based Differences in the Performance of the HEART Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Chest PainIngrid E. M. Bank0Vince C. de Hoog1Dominique P. V. de Kleijn2Gerard Pasterkamp3Pieter A. Doevendans4Hester M. den Ruijter5Geertje Dalmeijer6Thierry X. Wildbergh7Arend Mosterd8Leo Timmers9Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the NetherlandsLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the NetherlandsLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the NetherlandsLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the NetherlandsJulius Centrum for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the NetherlandsBackgroundSex‐based differences in clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and outcomes of patients with acute chest pain are increasingly being recognized, but are not implemented in guidelines and clinical prediction tools. We evaluated the performance of the HEART score in women versus men, because sex‐based differences may exist among the algorithm's components: history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and admission troponin level. Methods and ResultsThe HEART score was retrospectively assessed in 831 women and 1084 men presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain, assigning patients to the low‐, intermediate‐, or high‐risk category for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6 weeks. MACE, consisting of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and all‐cause death, also included events during index visit. Six‐week MACE rates were 2 times lower in women than men (10.0% versus 20.8%; P<0.01). Despite similar discriminatory accuracy of the HEART score among women and men (c‐statistic, 0.80 [0.75–0.84] versus 0.77 [0.74–0.81]; P=0.43), 6‐week MACE rates were significantly lower in women than men across all HEART risk categories: 2.1% versus 6.5% (P<0.01) in the low‐risk category, 12.7% versus 21.3% (P<0.01) in intermediate‐risk category, and 53.1% versus 77.0% (P=0.02) in the high‐risk category. The HEART score‐adjusted risk ratio for men was 1.6 (1.3–2.0; P<0.01). ConclusionsThe markedly higher 6‐week MACE risk in men across all HEART risk categories should be taken into account when using the HEART score to guide clinical decision making; early discharge with a low‐risk HEART score appears less safe for men than women with acute chest pain.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.116.005373acute coronary syndromedecision aidssex disparitiesmajor adverse cardiac eventrisk stratification
spellingShingle Ingrid E. M. Bank
Vince C. de Hoog
Dominique P. V. de Kleijn
Gerard Pasterkamp
Pieter A. Doevendans
Hester M. den Ruijter
Geertje Dalmeijer
Thierry X. Wildbergh
Arend Mosterd
Leo Timmers
Sex‐Based Differences in the Performance of the HEART Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
acute coronary syndrome
decision aids
sex disparities
major adverse cardiac event
risk stratification
title Sex‐Based Differences in the Performance of the HEART Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain
title_full Sex‐Based Differences in the Performance of the HEART Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain
title_fullStr Sex‐Based Differences in the Performance of the HEART Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain
title_full_unstemmed Sex‐Based Differences in the Performance of the HEART Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain
title_short Sex‐Based Differences in the Performance of the HEART Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain
title_sort sex based differences in the performance of the heart score in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain
topic acute coronary syndrome
decision aids
sex disparities
major adverse cardiac event
risk stratification
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.116.005373
work_keys_str_mv AT ingridembank sexbaseddifferencesintheperformanceoftheheartscoreinpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithacutechestpain
AT vincecdehoog sexbaseddifferencesintheperformanceoftheheartscoreinpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithacutechestpain
AT dominiquepvdekleijn sexbaseddifferencesintheperformanceoftheheartscoreinpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithacutechestpain
AT gerardpasterkamp sexbaseddifferencesintheperformanceoftheheartscoreinpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithacutechestpain
AT pieteradoevendans sexbaseddifferencesintheperformanceoftheheartscoreinpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithacutechestpain
AT hestermdenruijter sexbaseddifferencesintheperformanceoftheheartscoreinpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithacutechestpain
AT geertjedalmeijer sexbaseddifferencesintheperformanceoftheheartscoreinpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithacutechestpain
AT thierryxwildbergh sexbaseddifferencesintheperformanceoftheheartscoreinpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithacutechestpain
AT arendmosterd sexbaseddifferencesintheperformanceoftheheartscoreinpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithacutechestpain
AT leotimmers sexbaseddifferencesintheperformanceoftheheartscoreinpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentwithacutechestpain