Great debates in trauma biomechanics

Summary:. At the 2021 annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, the Basic Science Focus Forum hosted its first ever debate-style symposium focused on biomechanics and fracture repair. The 3 subjects of debate were “Mechanics versus Biology—Which is ‘More Important’ to Consider?” “Locked...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vaida Glatt, PhD, Robert O'Toole, MD, Samir Mehta, MD, Utku Kandemir, MD, William Ricci, MD, Aaron Nauth, MD, Emil Schemitsch, MD, Michael W. Hast, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2023-05-01
Series:OTA International
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000249
_version_ 1797646805491515392
author Vaida Glatt, PhD
Robert O'Toole, MD
Samir Mehta, MD
Utku Kandemir, MD
William Ricci, MD
Aaron Nauth, MD
Emil Schemitsch, MD
Michael W. Hast, PhD
author_facet Vaida Glatt, PhD
Robert O'Toole, MD
Samir Mehta, MD
Utku Kandemir, MD
William Ricci, MD
Aaron Nauth, MD
Emil Schemitsch, MD
Michael W. Hast, PhD
author_sort Vaida Glatt, PhD
collection DOAJ
description Summary:. At the 2021 annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, the Basic Science Focus Forum hosted its first ever debate-style symposium focused on biomechanics and fracture repair. The 3 subjects of debate were “Mechanics versus Biology—Which is ‘More Important’ to Consider?” “Locked Plate versus Forward Dynamization versus Reverse Dynamization—Which Way Should I Go?” and “Sawbones versus Cadaver Models—What Should I Believe Most?” These debates were held because fracture healing is a highly organized synergistic response between biological factors and the local mechanical environment. Multiple studies have demonstrated that both factors play roles in governing bone healing responses, and the causal relationships between the 2 remain unclear. The lack of clarity in this space has led to a spectrum of research with the common goal of helping surgeons make good decisions. Before reading further, the reader should understand that the questions posed in the debate titles are unanswerable and might represent a false choice. Instead, the reader should appreciate that the debates were held to gain a more thorough understanding of these topics based on the current state of the art of experimental and clinical studies, by using an engaging and thought-provoking format.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:07:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b9feb72553a14616a7a7d2cc3e199a35
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2574-2167
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:07:06Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series OTA International
spelling doaj.art-b9feb72553a14616a7a7d2cc3e199a352023-10-30T03:45:55ZengWolters KluwerOTA International2574-21672023-05-0162S10.1097/OI9.0000000000000249OI90000000000000249Great debates in trauma biomechanicsVaida Glatt, PhD0Robert O'Toole, MD1Samir Mehta, MD2Utku Kandemir, MD3William Ricci, MD4Aaron Nauth, MD5Emil Schemitsch, MD6Michael W. Hast, PhD7a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TXb Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MDc Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CAe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NYf Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; andg Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.c Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PASummary:. At the 2021 annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, the Basic Science Focus Forum hosted its first ever debate-style symposium focused on biomechanics and fracture repair. The 3 subjects of debate were “Mechanics versus Biology—Which is ‘More Important’ to Consider?” “Locked Plate versus Forward Dynamization versus Reverse Dynamization—Which Way Should I Go?” and “Sawbones versus Cadaver Models—What Should I Believe Most?” These debates were held because fracture healing is a highly organized synergistic response between biological factors and the local mechanical environment. Multiple studies have demonstrated that both factors play roles in governing bone healing responses, and the causal relationships between the 2 remain unclear. The lack of clarity in this space has led to a spectrum of research with the common goal of helping surgeons make good decisions. Before reading further, the reader should understand that the questions posed in the debate titles are unanswerable and might represent a false choice. Instead, the reader should appreciate that the debates were held to gain a more thorough understanding of these topics based on the current state of the art of experimental and clinical studies, by using an engaging and thought-provoking format.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000249
spellingShingle Vaida Glatt, PhD
Robert O'Toole, MD
Samir Mehta, MD
Utku Kandemir, MD
William Ricci, MD
Aaron Nauth, MD
Emil Schemitsch, MD
Michael W. Hast, PhD
Great debates in trauma biomechanics
OTA International
title Great debates in trauma biomechanics
title_full Great debates in trauma biomechanics
title_fullStr Great debates in trauma biomechanics
title_full_unstemmed Great debates in trauma biomechanics
title_short Great debates in trauma biomechanics
title_sort great debates in trauma biomechanics
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000249
work_keys_str_mv AT vaidaglattphd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics
AT robertotoolemd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics
AT samirmehtamd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics
AT utkukandemirmd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics
AT williamriccimd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics
AT aaronnauthmd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics
AT emilschemitschmd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics
AT michaelwhastphd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics