Great debates in trauma biomechanics
Summary:. At the 2021 annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, the Basic Science Focus Forum hosted its first ever debate-style symposium focused on biomechanics and fracture repair. The 3 subjects of debate were “Mechanics versus Biology—Which is ‘More Important’ to Consider?” “Locked...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2023-05-01
|
Series: | OTA International |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000249 |
_version_ | 1797646805491515392 |
---|---|
author | Vaida Glatt, PhD Robert O'Toole, MD Samir Mehta, MD Utku Kandemir, MD William Ricci, MD Aaron Nauth, MD Emil Schemitsch, MD Michael W. Hast, PhD |
author_facet | Vaida Glatt, PhD Robert O'Toole, MD Samir Mehta, MD Utku Kandemir, MD William Ricci, MD Aaron Nauth, MD Emil Schemitsch, MD Michael W. Hast, PhD |
author_sort | Vaida Glatt, PhD |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Summary:. At the 2021 annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, the Basic Science Focus Forum hosted its first ever debate-style symposium focused on biomechanics and fracture repair. The 3 subjects of debate were “Mechanics versus Biology—Which is ‘More Important’ to Consider?” “Locked Plate versus Forward Dynamization versus Reverse Dynamization—Which Way Should I Go?” and “Sawbones versus Cadaver Models—What Should I Believe Most?” These debates were held because fracture healing is a highly organized synergistic response between biological factors and the local mechanical environment. Multiple studies have demonstrated that both factors play roles in governing bone healing responses, and the causal relationships between the 2 remain unclear. The lack of clarity in this space has led to a spectrum of research with the common goal of helping surgeons make good decisions. Before reading further, the reader should understand that the questions posed in the debate titles are unanswerable and might represent a false choice. Instead, the reader should appreciate that the debates were held to gain a more thorough understanding of these topics based on the current state of the art of experimental and clinical studies, by using an engaging and thought-provoking format. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T15:07:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b9feb72553a14616a7a7d2cc3e199a35 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2574-2167 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T15:07:06Z |
publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | Article |
series | OTA International |
spelling | doaj.art-b9feb72553a14616a7a7d2cc3e199a352023-10-30T03:45:55ZengWolters KluwerOTA International2574-21672023-05-0162S10.1097/OI9.0000000000000249OI90000000000000249Great debates in trauma biomechanicsVaida Glatt, PhD0Robert O'Toole, MD1Samir Mehta, MD2Utku Kandemir, MD3William Ricci, MD4Aaron Nauth, MD5Emil Schemitsch, MD6Michael W. Hast, PhD7a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TXb Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MDc Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CAe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NYf Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; andg Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.c Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PASummary:. At the 2021 annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, the Basic Science Focus Forum hosted its first ever debate-style symposium focused on biomechanics and fracture repair. The 3 subjects of debate were “Mechanics versus Biology—Which is ‘More Important’ to Consider?” “Locked Plate versus Forward Dynamization versus Reverse Dynamization—Which Way Should I Go?” and “Sawbones versus Cadaver Models—What Should I Believe Most?” These debates were held because fracture healing is a highly organized synergistic response between biological factors and the local mechanical environment. Multiple studies have demonstrated that both factors play roles in governing bone healing responses, and the causal relationships between the 2 remain unclear. The lack of clarity in this space has led to a spectrum of research with the common goal of helping surgeons make good decisions. Before reading further, the reader should understand that the questions posed in the debate titles are unanswerable and might represent a false choice. Instead, the reader should appreciate that the debates were held to gain a more thorough understanding of these topics based on the current state of the art of experimental and clinical studies, by using an engaging and thought-provoking format.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000249 |
spellingShingle | Vaida Glatt, PhD Robert O'Toole, MD Samir Mehta, MD Utku Kandemir, MD William Ricci, MD Aaron Nauth, MD Emil Schemitsch, MD Michael W. Hast, PhD Great debates in trauma biomechanics OTA International |
title | Great debates in trauma biomechanics |
title_full | Great debates in trauma biomechanics |
title_fullStr | Great debates in trauma biomechanics |
title_full_unstemmed | Great debates in trauma biomechanics |
title_short | Great debates in trauma biomechanics |
title_sort | great debates in trauma biomechanics |
url | http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaidaglattphd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics AT robertotoolemd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics AT samirmehtamd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics AT utkukandemirmd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics AT williamriccimd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics AT aaronnauthmd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics AT emilschemitschmd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics AT michaelwhastphd greatdebatesintraumabiomechanics |