Cesarean delivery surgical techniques in Africa: A survey study from Ethiopia.

<h4>Objective</h4>To describe the surgical techniques of Caesarean delivery (CD) practiced by Ethiopian Obstetricians and Gynecologists.<h4>Methods</h4>A descriptive survey study was conducted in Ethiopia from March 1, 2021 to April 30, 2021. Members of the Ethiopian Society...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wondimu Gudu, Zekarias Taye Sisay, Mekitie Wondafrash, Abraham Fessehaye Sium
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292382
_version_ 1827771180349652992
author Wondimu Gudu
Zekarias Taye Sisay
Mekitie Wondafrash
Abraham Fessehaye Sium
author_facet Wondimu Gudu
Zekarias Taye Sisay
Mekitie Wondafrash
Abraham Fessehaye Sium
author_sort Wondimu Gudu
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>To describe the surgical techniques of Caesarean delivery (CD) practiced by Ethiopian Obstetricians and Gynecologists.<h4>Methods</h4>A descriptive survey study was conducted in Ethiopia from March 1, 2021 to April 30, 2021. Members of the Ethiopian Society of Obstetrician and Gynecologists were randomly selected and their Cesarean delivery surgical techniques were explored. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics 22. Simple descriptive analysis were employed and frequencies and percentage were calculated to present the data.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 258 obstetricians and Gynecologists practicing in Ethiopia were approached with a response rate of 97.3% (251/258). Double layer closure of uterine incision (98.4%) and subcuticular closure of skin wound (96.4%) are practiced by most of the participants. There was a large difference in practice of blunt versus sharp fascia extension (43.3 vs 55.8%), cephalo-caudad versus lateral uterine incision extension (58 vs.39%), and closure versus non-closure of pelvic and parietal peritoneum (57.4 vs 42.6, and 39.8 versus 60.2%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Blunt and sharp fascia extension, cephalo-caudad and lateral uterine incision extension, closure and non-closure of the pelvic and parietal peritoneum are practiced by similar numbers of Ethiopian Obstetricians and Gynecologists. This demonstrates a wide variation exists in the techniques of Cesarean Delivery across Ethiopia.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:49:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba02c2f53db144478ecd66f53abeca02
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:49:58Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ba02c2f53db144478ecd66f53abeca022023-11-04T05:33:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-011810e029238210.1371/journal.pone.0292382Cesarean delivery surgical techniques in Africa: A survey study from Ethiopia.Wondimu GuduZekarias Taye SisayMekitie WondafrashAbraham Fessehaye Sium<h4>Objective</h4>To describe the surgical techniques of Caesarean delivery (CD) practiced by Ethiopian Obstetricians and Gynecologists.<h4>Methods</h4>A descriptive survey study was conducted in Ethiopia from March 1, 2021 to April 30, 2021. Members of the Ethiopian Society of Obstetrician and Gynecologists were randomly selected and their Cesarean delivery surgical techniques were explored. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics 22. Simple descriptive analysis were employed and frequencies and percentage were calculated to present the data.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 258 obstetricians and Gynecologists practicing in Ethiopia were approached with a response rate of 97.3% (251/258). Double layer closure of uterine incision (98.4%) and subcuticular closure of skin wound (96.4%) are practiced by most of the participants. There was a large difference in practice of blunt versus sharp fascia extension (43.3 vs 55.8%), cephalo-caudad versus lateral uterine incision extension (58 vs.39%), and closure versus non-closure of pelvic and parietal peritoneum (57.4 vs 42.6, and 39.8 versus 60.2%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Blunt and sharp fascia extension, cephalo-caudad and lateral uterine incision extension, closure and non-closure of the pelvic and parietal peritoneum are practiced by similar numbers of Ethiopian Obstetricians and Gynecologists. This demonstrates a wide variation exists in the techniques of Cesarean Delivery across Ethiopia.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292382
spellingShingle Wondimu Gudu
Zekarias Taye Sisay
Mekitie Wondafrash
Abraham Fessehaye Sium
Cesarean delivery surgical techniques in Africa: A survey study from Ethiopia.
PLoS ONE
title Cesarean delivery surgical techniques in Africa: A survey study from Ethiopia.
title_full Cesarean delivery surgical techniques in Africa: A survey study from Ethiopia.
title_fullStr Cesarean delivery surgical techniques in Africa: A survey study from Ethiopia.
title_full_unstemmed Cesarean delivery surgical techniques in Africa: A survey study from Ethiopia.
title_short Cesarean delivery surgical techniques in Africa: A survey study from Ethiopia.
title_sort cesarean delivery surgical techniques in africa a survey study from ethiopia
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292382
work_keys_str_mv AT wondimugudu cesareandeliverysurgicaltechniquesinafricaasurveystudyfromethiopia
AT zekariastayesisay cesareandeliverysurgicaltechniquesinafricaasurveystudyfromethiopia
AT mekitiewondafrash cesareandeliverysurgicaltechniquesinafricaasurveystudyfromethiopia
AT abrahamfessehayesium cesareandeliverysurgicaltechniquesinafricaasurveystudyfromethiopia