Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material

(1) Background: Due to the limitations of composite cements, the authors carried out tests to compare such materials with preheated composite materials because the latter may be an alternative to cements in the adhesive cementation procedure. (2) Methods: The materials used in the adhesive cementati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anastazja Skapska, Zenon Komorek, Mariusz Cierech, Elzbieta Mierzwinska-Nastalska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Polymers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/13/2686
_version_ 1797434037950742528
author Anastazja Skapska
Zenon Komorek
Mariusz Cierech
Elzbieta Mierzwinska-Nastalska
author_facet Anastazja Skapska
Zenon Komorek
Mariusz Cierech
Elzbieta Mierzwinska-Nastalska
author_sort Anastazja Skapska
collection DOAJ
description (1) Background: Due to the limitations of composite cements, the authors carried out tests to compare such materials with preheated composite materials because the latter may be an alternative to cements in the adhesive cementation procedure. (2) Methods: The materials used in the adhesive cementation procedure, i.e., Enamel Plus Hri (Micerium, Avegno, Italy), a heated composite material, and RelyX U200 Automix (3M, Maplewood, MN, USA), a dual composite cement, were tested for microhardness, compressive strength, flexural strength, diametral compressive strength, and elastic modulus. Composite material was heated to the temperature of 50 degrees Celsius before polymerisation. (3) Results: Higher values of microhardness (by 67.36%), compressive strength (by 41.84%), elastic modulus (by 17.75%), flexural strength (by 36.03%), and diametral compressive strength (by 45.52%) were obtained using the Enamel Plus Hri composite material compared to the RelyX U200 self-adhesive cement. The survey results revealed statistically significant differences. (4) Conclusions: Due to its better mechanical properties, the heated composite material (Enamel Plus Hri) is a beneficial alternative to composite cements in the indirect restoration placement procedure. As the strength parameters of the heated composite material increase, a higher resistance to the compressive and bending forces present in the oral cavity, and hence a greater durability of the created prosthetic reconstructions can be expected.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:26:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba09ac05cdc640a5b8720fb6d9a5a704
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4360
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:26:06Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Polymers
spelling doaj.art-ba09ac05cdc640a5b8720fb6d9a5a7042023-12-01T21:39:45ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602022-06-011413268610.3390/polym14132686Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite MaterialAnastazja Skapska0Zenon Komorek1Mariusz Cierech2Elzbieta Mierzwinska-Nastalska3Department of Prosthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Advanced Technologies, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Prosthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Prosthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland(1) Background: Due to the limitations of composite cements, the authors carried out tests to compare such materials with preheated composite materials because the latter may be an alternative to cements in the adhesive cementation procedure. (2) Methods: The materials used in the adhesive cementation procedure, i.e., Enamel Plus Hri (Micerium, Avegno, Italy), a heated composite material, and RelyX U200 Automix (3M, Maplewood, MN, USA), a dual composite cement, were tested for microhardness, compressive strength, flexural strength, diametral compressive strength, and elastic modulus. Composite material was heated to the temperature of 50 degrees Celsius before polymerisation. (3) Results: Higher values of microhardness (by 67.36%), compressive strength (by 41.84%), elastic modulus (by 17.75%), flexural strength (by 36.03%), and diametral compressive strength (by 45.52%) were obtained using the Enamel Plus Hri composite material compared to the RelyX U200 self-adhesive cement. The survey results revealed statistically significant differences. (4) Conclusions: Due to its better mechanical properties, the heated composite material (Enamel Plus Hri) is a beneficial alternative to composite cements in the indirect restoration placement procedure. As the strength parameters of the heated composite material increase, a higher resistance to the compressive and bending forces present in the oral cavity, and hence a greater durability of the created prosthetic reconstructions can be expected.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/13/2686composite materialspreheated composite materialadhesive cementation
spellingShingle Anastazja Skapska
Zenon Komorek
Mariusz Cierech
Elzbieta Mierzwinska-Nastalska
Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material
Polymers
composite materials
preheated composite material
adhesive cementation
title Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material
title_full Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material
title_fullStr Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material
title_short Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material
title_sort comparison of mechanical properties of a self adhesive composite cement and a heated composite material
topic composite materials
preheated composite material
adhesive cementation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/13/2686
work_keys_str_mv AT anastazjaskapska comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofaselfadhesivecompositecementandaheatedcompositematerial
AT zenonkomorek comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofaselfadhesivecompositecementandaheatedcompositematerial
AT mariuszcierech comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofaselfadhesivecompositecementandaheatedcompositematerial
AT elzbietamierzwinskanastalska comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofaselfadhesivecompositecementandaheatedcompositematerial