Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material
(1) Background: Due to the limitations of composite cements, the authors carried out tests to compare such materials with preheated composite materials because the latter may be an alternative to cements in the adhesive cementation procedure. (2) Methods: The materials used in the adhesive cementati...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Polymers |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/13/2686 |
_version_ | 1797434037950742528 |
---|---|
author | Anastazja Skapska Zenon Komorek Mariusz Cierech Elzbieta Mierzwinska-Nastalska |
author_facet | Anastazja Skapska Zenon Komorek Mariusz Cierech Elzbieta Mierzwinska-Nastalska |
author_sort | Anastazja Skapska |
collection | DOAJ |
description | (1) Background: Due to the limitations of composite cements, the authors carried out tests to compare such materials with preheated composite materials because the latter may be an alternative to cements in the adhesive cementation procedure. (2) Methods: The materials used in the adhesive cementation procedure, i.e., Enamel Plus Hri (Micerium, Avegno, Italy), a heated composite material, and RelyX U200 Automix (3M, Maplewood, MN, USA), a dual composite cement, were tested for microhardness, compressive strength, flexural strength, diametral compressive strength, and elastic modulus. Composite material was heated to the temperature of 50 degrees Celsius before polymerisation. (3) Results: Higher values of microhardness (by 67.36%), compressive strength (by 41.84%), elastic modulus (by 17.75%), flexural strength (by 36.03%), and diametral compressive strength (by 45.52%) were obtained using the Enamel Plus Hri composite material compared to the RelyX U200 self-adhesive cement. The survey results revealed statistically significant differences. (4) Conclusions: Due to its better mechanical properties, the heated composite material (Enamel Plus Hri) is a beneficial alternative to composite cements in the indirect restoration placement procedure. As the strength parameters of the heated composite material increase, a higher resistance to the compressive and bending forces present in the oral cavity, and hence a greater durability of the created prosthetic reconstructions can be expected. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T10:26:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ba09ac05cdc640a5b8720fb6d9a5a704 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-4360 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T10:26:06Z |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Polymers |
spelling | doaj.art-ba09ac05cdc640a5b8720fb6d9a5a7042023-12-01T21:39:45ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602022-06-011413268610.3390/polym14132686Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite MaterialAnastazja Skapska0Zenon Komorek1Mariusz Cierech2Elzbieta Mierzwinska-Nastalska3Department of Prosthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Advanced Technologies, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Prosthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Prosthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland(1) Background: Due to the limitations of composite cements, the authors carried out tests to compare such materials with preheated composite materials because the latter may be an alternative to cements in the adhesive cementation procedure. (2) Methods: The materials used in the adhesive cementation procedure, i.e., Enamel Plus Hri (Micerium, Avegno, Italy), a heated composite material, and RelyX U200 Automix (3M, Maplewood, MN, USA), a dual composite cement, were tested for microhardness, compressive strength, flexural strength, diametral compressive strength, and elastic modulus. Composite material was heated to the temperature of 50 degrees Celsius before polymerisation. (3) Results: Higher values of microhardness (by 67.36%), compressive strength (by 41.84%), elastic modulus (by 17.75%), flexural strength (by 36.03%), and diametral compressive strength (by 45.52%) were obtained using the Enamel Plus Hri composite material compared to the RelyX U200 self-adhesive cement. The survey results revealed statistically significant differences. (4) Conclusions: Due to its better mechanical properties, the heated composite material (Enamel Plus Hri) is a beneficial alternative to composite cements in the indirect restoration placement procedure. As the strength parameters of the heated composite material increase, a higher resistance to the compressive and bending forces present in the oral cavity, and hence a greater durability of the created prosthetic reconstructions can be expected.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/13/2686composite materialspreheated composite materialadhesive cementation |
spellingShingle | Anastazja Skapska Zenon Komorek Mariusz Cierech Elzbieta Mierzwinska-Nastalska Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material Polymers composite materials preheated composite material adhesive cementation |
title | Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material |
title_full | Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material |
title_short | Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material |
title_sort | comparison of mechanical properties of a self adhesive composite cement and a heated composite material |
topic | composite materials preheated composite material adhesive cementation |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/13/2686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anastazjaskapska comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofaselfadhesivecompositecementandaheatedcompositematerial AT zenonkomorek comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofaselfadhesivecompositecementandaheatedcompositematerial AT mariuszcierech comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofaselfadhesivecompositecementandaheatedcompositematerial AT elzbietamierzwinskanastalska comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofaselfadhesivecompositecementandaheatedcompositematerial |