Ambiguity and uncertainty in 'breaking bad news' simulation

Introduction: Ambiguity and uncertainty are intrinsic aspects of contemporary medicine, and there is a need for methods to train medical students to tolerate them better. This article distinguishes the ways that different standardized patient (SP) personality types provide opportunities for medical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaisu Koski, Kirsten Ostherr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University College of Medical Sciences 2021-07-01
Series:Research and Humanities in Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rhime.in/ojs/index.php/rhime/article/view/471
_version_ 1828162344015888384
author Kaisu Koski
Kirsten Ostherr
author_facet Kaisu Koski
Kirsten Ostherr
author_sort Kaisu Koski
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Ambiguity and uncertainty are intrinsic aspects of contemporary medicine, and there is a need for methods to train medical students to tolerate them better. This article distinguishes the ways that different standardized patient (SP) personality types provide opportunities for medical students to practice tolerating ambiguity and uncertainty associated with breaking bad news (BBN). Methods: This ethnographic study draws data from nine student encounters with two female SPs who specialize in the BBN simulation. It utilizes the literary concepts of “unfinalizability” and parallel “time zones” to reflect upon manifestations of uncertainty and ambiguity in SP performances. Results: The SPs challenged the linear progression of the BBN encounter by including shifts between different time zones in the patient’s mental-experiential continuum. The study identified seven main forms of resistance in the SP performance, all geared toward challenging the linear and complete conduct of the student performance: resisting being considered a patient, resisting decision-making, resisting authority, resisting here-and-now, resisting being seated, resisting closure, and resisting death/life. Discussion: The SPs’ distinct personality types have the potential to improve students’ ability to respond to individuals with different temporal orientations, and support them to tolerate encounters with various kinds of open endings.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:52:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba10c1097c484754b4e1c869a84b28d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2350-0565
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:52:53Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher University College of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Research and Humanities in Medical Education
spelling doaj.art-ba10c1097c484754b4e1c869a84b28d52022-12-22T03:54:41ZengUniversity College of Medical SciencesResearch and Humanities in Medical Education2350-05652021-07-0187582597Ambiguity and uncertainty in 'breaking bad news' simulationKaisu Koski0Kirsten Ostherr1Sheffield Hallam UniversityGladys Louise Fox Professor and Chair, Dept. of English, and Director, Medical Humanities, Rice University, Houston TXIntroduction: Ambiguity and uncertainty are intrinsic aspects of contemporary medicine, and there is a need for methods to train medical students to tolerate them better. This article distinguishes the ways that different standardized patient (SP) personality types provide opportunities for medical students to practice tolerating ambiguity and uncertainty associated with breaking bad news (BBN). Methods: This ethnographic study draws data from nine student encounters with two female SPs who specialize in the BBN simulation. It utilizes the literary concepts of “unfinalizability” and parallel “time zones” to reflect upon manifestations of uncertainty and ambiguity in SP performances. Results: The SPs challenged the linear progression of the BBN encounter by including shifts between different time zones in the patient’s mental-experiential continuum. The study identified seven main forms of resistance in the SP performance, all geared toward challenging the linear and complete conduct of the student performance: resisting being considered a patient, resisting decision-making, resisting authority, resisting here-and-now, resisting being seated, resisting closure, and resisting death/life. Discussion: The SPs’ distinct personality types have the potential to improve students’ ability to respond to individuals with different temporal orientations, and support them to tolerate encounters with various kinds of open endings.https://www.rhime.in/ojs/index.php/rhime/article/view/471ambiguitybreaking bad newsmedical educationperformative techniquestandardized patientstime perceptionuncertaintyunfinalizability
spellingShingle Kaisu Koski
Kirsten Ostherr
Ambiguity and uncertainty in 'breaking bad news' simulation
Research and Humanities in Medical Education
ambiguity
breaking bad news
medical education
performative technique
standardized patients
time perception
uncertainty
unfinalizability
title Ambiguity and uncertainty in 'breaking bad news' simulation
title_full Ambiguity and uncertainty in 'breaking bad news' simulation
title_fullStr Ambiguity and uncertainty in 'breaking bad news' simulation
title_full_unstemmed Ambiguity and uncertainty in 'breaking bad news' simulation
title_short Ambiguity and uncertainty in 'breaking bad news' simulation
title_sort ambiguity and uncertainty in breaking bad news simulation
topic ambiguity
breaking bad news
medical education
performative technique
standardized patients
time perception
uncertainty
unfinalizability
url https://www.rhime.in/ojs/index.php/rhime/article/view/471
work_keys_str_mv AT kaisukoski ambiguityanduncertaintyinbreakingbadnewssimulation
AT kirstenostherr ambiguityanduncertaintyinbreakingbadnewssimulation