MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENT
The article analyzed the problem of mnemotechnic of pain in the context of the historical transformation of thinking from archaic bodily practices of graphism of pain to the modern culture of anesthesia. The conceptual knot, which forms pain, suffering, memory, procedures of designation and enjoymen...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Publishing
2018-12-01
|
| Series: | Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія Філософія, філософські перипетії |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philosophy/article/view/12825/12151 |
| _version_ | 1818615496282472448 |
|---|---|
| author | Oleh М. Perepelytsia |
| author_facet | Oleh М. Perepelytsia |
| author_sort | Oleh М. Perepelytsia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article analyzed the problem of mnemotechnic of pain in the context of the historical transformation of thinking from archaic bodily practices of graphism of pain to the modern culture of anesthesia. The conceptual knot, which forms pain, suffering, memory, procedures of designation and enjoyment, is defined. Subject is defined to be central that goes beyond the opposition/dialectic of myth and reason. This allows us to turn to the premythic and to analyze the graphism of pain as the basis of human existence in the context of the formation of individual and collective memory. In the meantime, the myth is interpreted as an attempt to portray the labeled physical bodies of the world, given the distinction between them. The formation of relations of power is associated with the establishment of a correlation between sign and pain, which makes it possible to understand of pain as the basis of social memory. On the other hand, the historical-philosophical subject is distinguished, according to which the bodily topical of the perceptions and the metabodily topic of concepts are distinguished. The metaphysical shift laid down by the ancient philosophers transforms mnemotechnic into practice, which constantly takes into account the distinction between the sensual (physical) and the supersensual (spiritual), the ideal and the real, the true and the false, the one and the plural, being and non-existence. Mnemotechnic, which constitutes the metaphysical world, excludes the body as a matter of memory, leaving the pain beyond the added significance. Probably, it is possible to link the excesses of Sade’s search for enjoyment and cases of dramatic erosion of man to naked bodility, which captures the outbreaks of violence and torture in the century. In the end, it transforms modern culture into a culture of anesthesia, a culture of memory as an anesthetic, directed against the repetition of pain. Nevertheless, at the same time, it causes new pleasures to seek pain. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T16:34:50Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ba1196ca7aeb4202aa29dff91c0b3eb3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2226-0994 2414-5904 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T16:34:50Z |
| publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
| publisher | V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія Філософія, філософські перипетії |
| spelling | doaj.art-ba1196ca7aeb4202aa29dff91c0b3eb32022-12-21T22:24:30ZengV.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University PublishingВісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія Філософія, філософські перипетії2226-09942414-59042018-12-0159162410.26565/2226-0994-2018-59-2MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENTOleh М. Perepelytsia0V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National UniversityThe article analyzed the problem of mnemotechnic of pain in the context of the historical transformation of thinking from archaic bodily practices of graphism of pain to the modern culture of anesthesia. The conceptual knot, which forms pain, suffering, memory, procedures of designation and enjoyment, is defined. Subject is defined to be central that goes beyond the opposition/dialectic of myth and reason. This allows us to turn to the premythic and to analyze the graphism of pain as the basis of human existence in the context of the formation of individual and collective memory. In the meantime, the myth is interpreted as an attempt to portray the labeled physical bodies of the world, given the distinction between them. The formation of relations of power is associated with the establishment of a correlation between sign and pain, which makes it possible to understand of pain as the basis of social memory. On the other hand, the historical-philosophical subject is distinguished, according to which the bodily topical of the perceptions and the metabodily topic of concepts are distinguished. The metaphysical shift laid down by the ancient philosophers transforms mnemotechnic into practice, which constantly takes into account the distinction between the sensual (physical) and the supersensual (spiritual), the ideal and the real, the true and the false, the one and the plural, being and non-existence. Mnemotechnic, which constitutes the metaphysical world, excludes the body as a matter of memory, leaving the pain beyond the added significance. Probably, it is possible to link the excesses of Sade’s search for enjoyment and cases of dramatic erosion of man to naked bodility, which captures the outbreaks of violence and torture in the century. In the end, it transforms modern culture into a culture of anesthesia, a culture of memory as an anesthetic, directed against the repetition of pain. Nevertheless, at the same time, it causes new pleasures to seek pain.https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philosophy/article/view/12825/12151painsufferingmemorymnemotechnicgraphism of painenjoyment |
| spellingShingle | Oleh М. Perepelytsia MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENT Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія Філософія, філософські перипетії pain suffering memory mnemotechnic graphism of pain enjoyment |
| title | MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENT |
| title_full | MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENT |
| title_fullStr | MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENT |
| title_full_unstemmed | MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENT |
| title_short | MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENT |
| title_sort | mnemotechnic of pain between suffering and enjoyment |
| topic | pain suffering memory mnemotechnic graphism of pain enjoyment |
| url | https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philosophy/article/view/12825/12151 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT olehmperepelytsia mnemotechnicofpainbetweensufferingandenjoyment |