Role of tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities: a comparative prospective study

Abstract Background Tomosynthesis is a recent advancement of full-field digital mammography involves transforming two-dimensional (2D) breast images into three dimensions (3D) images. It reduces the adverse effect of tissue superimposition on conventional 2D- mammography, therefore having high poten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasha Osama Abdel Ghany Ahmed, Mohamed Abo El-Hoda Darwish, Nivine Abd Elmoneim Chalabi, Salma Hassan Tantawy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-06-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-023-01057-2
_version_ 1797795800852463616
author Rasha Osama Abdel Ghany Ahmed
Mohamed Abo El-Hoda Darwish
Nivine Abd Elmoneim Chalabi
Salma Hassan Tantawy
author_facet Rasha Osama Abdel Ghany Ahmed
Mohamed Abo El-Hoda Darwish
Nivine Abd Elmoneim Chalabi
Salma Hassan Tantawy
author_sort Rasha Osama Abdel Ghany Ahmed
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Tomosynthesis is a recent advancement of full-field digital mammography involves transforming two-dimensional (2D) breast images into three dimensions (3D) images. It reduces the adverse effect of tissue superimposition on conventional 2D- mammography, therefore having high potential enhancing identification and assessment of asymmetric breast densities. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of breast ultrasound and 3D digital breast tomosynthesis in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities. Results In the current study, 80 patients with 80 mammographically and/or tomosynthesized breast asymmetries were included. The patients' ages ranged from 30 to 70 years old, with a mean age of 47.2 ± 9.2 SD. Breast ultrasound outperformed digital breast tomosynthesis in terms of diagnostic performance. Tomosynthesis had a sensitivity of 86.4%, specificity of 93.1%, positive predictive value of 82.6%, negative predictive value of 94.7%, and accuracy of 91.3% compared to ultrasounds' sensitivity of 100.00%, specificity of 93.1%, positive predictive value of 84.6%, negative predictive value of 100.00%, and accuracy of 95%. Conclusions Incorporating ultrasonography in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities outperformed tomosynthesis and shown to be more precise in characterisation of lesions underlying asymmetric breast density.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:23:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba1968b0610b4d588357d7ad2e7db5d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-4762
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:23:30Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
spelling doaj.art-ba1968b0610b4d588357d7ad2e7db5d32023-06-25T11:12:16ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine2090-47622023-06-0154111210.1186/s43055-023-01057-2Role of tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities: a comparative prospective studyRasha Osama Abdel Ghany Ahmed0Mohamed Abo El-Hoda Darwish1Nivine Abd Elmoneim Chalabi2Salma Hassan Tantawy3Radiodiagnosis Department, Al Ahrar Teaching HospitalRadiodiagnosis Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityRadiodiagnosis Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityRadiodiagnosis Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityAbstract Background Tomosynthesis is a recent advancement of full-field digital mammography involves transforming two-dimensional (2D) breast images into three dimensions (3D) images. It reduces the adverse effect of tissue superimposition on conventional 2D- mammography, therefore having high potential enhancing identification and assessment of asymmetric breast densities. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of breast ultrasound and 3D digital breast tomosynthesis in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities. Results In the current study, 80 patients with 80 mammographically and/or tomosynthesized breast asymmetries were included. The patients' ages ranged from 30 to 70 years old, with a mean age of 47.2 ± 9.2 SD. Breast ultrasound outperformed digital breast tomosynthesis in terms of diagnostic performance. Tomosynthesis had a sensitivity of 86.4%, specificity of 93.1%, positive predictive value of 82.6%, negative predictive value of 94.7%, and accuracy of 91.3% compared to ultrasounds' sensitivity of 100.00%, specificity of 93.1%, positive predictive value of 84.6%, negative predictive value of 100.00%, and accuracy of 95%. Conclusions Incorporating ultrasonography in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities outperformed tomosynthesis and shown to be more precise in characterisation of lesions underlying asymmetric breast density.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-023-01057-2MammographyDBTUSBreast asymmetries
spellingShingle Rasha Osama Abdel Ghany Ahmed
Mohamed Abo El-Hoda Darwish
Nivine Abd Elmoneim Chalabi
Salma Hassan Tantawy
Role of tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities: a comparative prospective study
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Mammography
DBT
US
Breast asymmetries
title Role of tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities: a comparative prospective study
title_full Role of tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities: a comparative prospective study
title_fullStr Role of tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities: a comparative prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Role of tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities: a comparative prospective study
title_short Role of tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities: a comparative prospective study
title_sort role of tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities a comparative prospective study
topic Mammography
DBT
US
Breast asymmetries
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-023-01057-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rashaosamaabdelghanyahmed roleoftomosynthesisandultrasoundintheassessmentofasymmetricbreastdensitiesacomparativeprospectivestudy
AT mohamedaboelhodadarwish roleoftomosynthesisandultrasoundintheassessmentofasymmetricbreastdensitiesacomparativeprospectivestudy
AT nivineabdelmoneimchalabi roleoftomosynthesisandultrasoundintheassessmentofasymmetricbreastdensitiesacomparativeprospectivestudy
AT salmahassantantawy roleoftomosynthesisandultrasoundintheassessmentofasymmetricbreastdensitiesacomparativeprospectivestudy