Microleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer

Background and Aim: One of the weaknesses of Class II composite resin restorations is gingival microleakage which contributes to postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries. The aim was to evaluate the microleakage in Class II composite resin restorations with different thicknesses of resin-modif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Horieh Moosavi, Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour, Mohaddeceh Karamimoghaddam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Islamic Dental Association of Iran 2018-07-01
Series:Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jidai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-911&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1818174092254117888
author Horieh Moosavi
Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour
Mohaddeceh Karamimoghaddam
author_facet Horieh Moosavi
Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour
Mohaddeceh Karamimoghaddam
author_sort Horieh Moosavi
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aim: One of the weaknesses of Class II composite resin restorations is gingival microleakage which contributes to postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries. The aim was to evaluate the microleakage in Class II composite resin restorations with different thicknesses of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, standardized Class II slot cavities were prepared on the proximal surfaces of 90 molars. In group 1, total-etch adhesive and composite resin were applied using the incremental technique. In group 2, total-etch adhesive and composite were applied using the bulk technique. In group 3, 1 mm of RMGI was applied over the gingival floor, which was covered with increments of composite. In group 4, 1 mm of RMGI was placed on the gingival floor and covered with composite using the bulk technique. In group 5, 2 mm of RMGI was applied over the gingival floor, followed by an incremental composite placement. In group 6, 2 mm of RMGI was placed on the gingival floor, and the cavity was filled using the bulk technique. After thermocycling and staining with methylene blue, the samples were sectioned, and the extent of dye penetration was examined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression (α=0.05). Results: The lowest and highest dye penetrations were observed in the first, second, and fifth groups, respectively. The RMGI thickness did not influence the microleakage scores significantly in either composite placement techniques (P=0.828). Conclusion: None of the restorative techniques completely eliminated microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T19:38:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba1bc47ddb594bea82e6893896167676
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2383-3041
2383-3041
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T19:38:54Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Islamic Dental Association of Iran
record_format Article
series Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran
spelling doaj.art-ba1bc47ddb594bea82e68938961676762022-12-22T00:53:04ZengIslamic Dental Association of IranJournal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran2383-30412383-30412018-07-01303119126Microleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass IonomerHorieh Moosavi0Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour1Mohaddeceh Karamimoghaddam2 Associate Professor, Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran Assistant Professor, Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran Dentist, Private Practice, Mashhad, Iran Background and Aim: One of the weaknesses of Class II composite resin restorations is gingival microleakage which contributes to postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries. The aim was to evaluate the microleakage in Class II composite resin restorations with different thicknesses of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, standardized Class II slot cavities were prepared on the proximal surfaces of 90 molars. In group 1, total-etch adhesive and composite resin were applied using the incremental technique. In group 2, total-etch adhesive and composite were applied using the bulk technique. In group 3, 1 mm of RMGI was applied over the gingival floor, which was covered with increments of composite. In group 4, 1 mm of RMGI was placed on the gingival floor and covered with composite using the bulk technique. In group 5, 2 mm of RMGI was applied over the gingival floor, followed by an incremental composite placement. In group 6, 2 mm of RMGI was placed on the gingival floor, and the cavity was filled using the bulk technique. After thermocycling and staining with methylene blue, the samples were sectioned, and the extent of dye penetration was examined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression (α=0.05). Results: The lowest and highest dye penetrations were observed in the first, second, and fifth groups, respectively. The RMGI thickness did not influence the microleakage scores significantly in either composite placement techniques (P=0.828). Conclusion: None of the restorative techniques completely eliminated microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations.http://jidai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-911&slc_lang=en&sid=1Dental LeakageComposite ResinsGlass IonomerOpen Sandwich
spellingShingle Horieh Moosavi
Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour
Mohaddeceh Karamimoghaddam
Microleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran
Dental Leakage
Composite Resins
Glass Ionomer
Open Sandwich
title Microleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
title_full Microleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
title_fullStr Microleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
title_full_unstemmed Microleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
title_short Microleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
title_sort microleakage evaluation of class ii composite resin restorations with different thicknesses of resin modified glass ionomer
topic Dental Leakage
Composite Resins
Glass Ionomer
Open Sandwich
url http://jidai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-911&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT horiehmoosavi microleakageevaluationofclassiicompositeresinrestorationswithdifferentthicknessesofresinmodifiedglassionomer
AT hamidehsadatmohammadipour microleakageevaluationofclassiicompositeresinrestorationswithdifferentthicknessesofresinmodifiedglassionomer
AT mohaddecehkaramimoghaddam microleakageevaluationofclassiicompositeresinrestorationswithdifferentthicknessesofresinmodifiedglassionomer