Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Number Needed to Screen among Rural High School Children in Southern India: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: Avoidable blindness is mainly due to uncorrected refractive errors (URE). School Eye Screening (SES) can be used as an initiative to address this issue. Aim: To determine prevalence of URE and Number Needed to Screen (NNS) to find one child with low vision or blindness from URE am...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deepika Dorothy John, Padma Paul, Evon Selina Kujur, Sarada David, Smitha Jasper, Jayaprakash Muliyil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2017-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/10476/25388_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_PF!_(SY_MJ_PY)_PFA(SY_SS).pdf
_version_ 1828849767177781248
author Deepika Dorothy John
Padma Paul
Evon Selina Kujur
Sarada David
Smitha Jasper
Jayaprakash Muliyil
author_facet Deepika Dorothy John
Padma Paul
Evon Selina Kujur
Sarada David
Smitha Jasper
Jayaprakash Muliyil
author_sort Deepika Dorothy John
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Avoidable blindness is mainly due to uncorrected refractive errors (URE). School Eye Screening (SES) can be used as an initiative to address this issue. Aim: To determine prevalence of URE and Number Needed to Screen (NNS) to find one child with low vision or blindness from URE among rural school children. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in 22 government schools with sixth to ninth grades in Kaniyambadi block of Vellore District of Tamil Nadu, India. There were 4739 children on the rolls. Among children present, all those identified to have a visual deficit in either eye, using a single line 20/40 Snellen’s optotype E chart at 6 m, were referred to the hospital for confirmatory evaluation. Blindness (uncorrected) was defined as inability to see 20/200 in the better eye. In two of these schools, visual deficits were validated through a second school based examination by a clinician. Results: Of the 4739 children on rolls, 601 were absent; all 4138 (87.3%) who were present underwent screening; 2.3% (98) {95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.8 to 2.8} failed the screening test in at least one eye and were referred for examination. Only 28 (28.6%) of 98 children who were referred came for examination to the hospital. In the 2 of the 22 schools where the visual deficit was validated, there were no false positives. The prevalence of refractive error in these two schools was 2.2% (95% CI 1.7 – 2.7). NNS to detect one child with low vision or blindness from URE was 147. Conclusion: Magnitude of refractive error, low NNS, low response to referral necessitates complete care at school and hence a relook at the current SES program.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T22:58:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba29e9d392e941d0a89290080b5ffac2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T22:58:19Z
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-ba29e9d392e941d0a89290080b5ffac22022-12-22T00:08:54ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2017-08-01118NC16NC1910.7860/JCDR/2017/25388.10476Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Number Needed to Screen among Rural High School Children in Southern India: A Cross-sectional StudyDeepika Dorothy John0Padma Paul1Evon Selina Kujur2Sarada David3Smitha Jasper4Jayaprakash Muliyil5Postgraduate Registrar, Department of Ophthalmology, CMC, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, CMC, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.Tutor Incharge, Department of Ophthalmology, CMC, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, CMC, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, CMC, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.Professor, Department of Community Health, CMC, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.Introduction: Avoidable blindness is mainly due to uncorrected refractive errors (URE). School Eye Screening (SES) can be used as an initiative to address this issue. Aim: To determine prevalence of URE and Number Needed to Screen (NNS) to find one child with low vision or blindness from URE among rural school children. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in 22 government schools with sixth to ninth grades in Kaniyambadi block of Vellore District of Tamil Nadu, India. There were 4739 children on the rolls. Among children present, all those identified to have a visual deficit in either eye, using a single line 20/40 Snellen’s optotype E chart at 6 m, were referred to the hospital for confirmatory evaluation. Blindness (uncorrected) was defined as inability to see 20/200 in the better eye. In two of these schools, visual deficits were validated through a second school based examination by a clinician. Results: Of the 4739 children on rolls, 601 were absent; all 4138 (87.3%) who were present underwent screening; 2.3% (98) {95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.8 to 2.8} failed the screening test in at least one eye and were referred for examination. Only 28 (28.6%) of 98 children who were referred came for examination to the hospital. In the 2 of the 22 schools where the visual deficit was validated, there were no false positives. The prevalence of refractive error in these two schools was 2.2% (95% CI 1.7 – 2.7). NNS to detect one child with low vision or blindness from URE was 147. Conclusion: Magnitude of refractive error, low NNS, low response to referral necessitates complete care at school and hence a relook at the current SES program.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/10476/25388_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_PF!_(SY_MJ_PY)_PFA(SY_SS).pdfavoidable blindnesschildhood blindnesslow visionmyopiaschool eye screening
spellingShingle Deepika Dorothy John
Padma Paul
Evon Selina Kujur
Sarada David
Smitha Jasper
Jayaprakash Muliyil
Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Number Needed to Screen among Rural High School Children in Southern India: A Cross-sectional Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
avoidable blindness
childhood blindness
low vision
myopia
school eye screening
title Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Number Needed to Screen among Rural High School Children in Southern India: A Cross-sectional Study
title_full Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Number Needed to Screen among Rural High School Children in Southern India: A Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Number Needed to Screen among Rural High School Children in Southern India: A Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Number Needed to Screen among Rural High School Children in Southern India: A Cross-sectional Study
title_short Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Number Needed to Screen among Rural High School Children in Southern India: A Cross-sectional Study
title_sort prevalence of refractive errors and number needed to screen among rural high school children in southern india a cross sectional study
topic avoidable blindness
childhood blindness
low vision
myopia
school eye screening
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/10476/25388_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_PF!_(SY_MJ_PY)_PFA(SY_SS).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT deepikadorothyjohn prevalenceofrefractiveerrorsandnumberneededtoscreenamongruralhighschoolchildreninsouthernindiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT padmapaul prevalenceofrefractiveerrorsandnumberneededtoscreenamongruralhighschoolchildreninsouthernindiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT evonselinakujur prevalenceofrefractiveerrorsandnumberneededtoscreenamongruralhighschoolchildreninsouthernindiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT saradadavid prevalenceofrefractiveerrorsandnumberneededtoscreenamongruralhighschoolchildreninsouthernindiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT smithajasper prevalenceofrefractiveerrorsandnumberneededtoscreenamongruralhighschoolchildreninsouthernindiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT jayaprakashmuliyil prevalenceofrefractiveerrorsandnumberneededtoscreenamongruralhighschoolchildreninsouthernindiaacrosssectionalstudy