Contra Horowitz: A Case for Reparations to Blacks for Slavery

Horowitz rejects reparations for African Americans. We demonstrate that their heirs are entitled to the property illegitimately obtained by the slave owners. When we operate under the libertarian homesteading principle, the land should be redistributed back to the people who worked and tilled it fir...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jon-Paul Amos, Walter E. Block
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Libertas međunarodno sveučilište 2022-01-01
Series:Međunarodne Studije
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/416288
_version_ 1828090595532341248
author Jon-Paul Amos
Walter E. Block
author_facet Jon-Paul Amos
Walter E. Block
author_sort Jon-Paul Amos
collection DOAJ
description Horowitz rejects reparations for African Americans. We demonstrate that their heirs are entitled to the property illegitimately obtained by the slave owners. When we operate under the libertarian homesteading principle, the land should be redistributed back to the people who worked and tilled it first. That is, the black slaves. Horowitz’s claims against reparations serve as a poor refutation towards the reparations argument. African Americans are entitled to the “40 acres and a mule” that was promised, yet never fulfilled. We rely upon libertarian theory to clearly understand the case for reparations.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:58:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba390adc399445068affa0b8a822a609
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1332-4756
2459-623X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:58:58Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Libertas međunarodno sveučilište
record_format Article
series Međunarodne Studije
spelling doaj.art-ba390adc399445068affa0b8a822a6092022-12-22T04:41:47ZengLibertas međunarodno sveučilišteMeđunarodne Studije1332-47562459-623X2022-01-01XXII2355710.46672/ms.22.2.2343Contra Horowitz: A Case for Reparations to Blacks for SlaveryJon-Paul Amos0Walter E. Block1Loyola University New Orleans, Louisiana, USALoyola University New Orleans, Louisiana, USAHorowitz rejects reparations for African Americans. We demonstrate that their heirs are entitled to the property illegitimately obtained by the slave owners. When we operate under the libertarian homesteading principle, the land should be redistributed back to the people who worked and tilled it first. That is, the black slaves. Horowitz’s claims against reparations serve as a poor refutation towards the reparations argument. African Americans are entitled to the “40 acres and a mule” that was promised, yet never fulfilled. We rely upon libertarian theory to clearly understand the case for reparations.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/416288libertarianhomesteadingreparationsproperty rightsslavery
spellingShingle Jon-Paul Amos
Walter E. Block
Contra Horowitz: A Case for Reparations to Blacks for Slavery
Međunarodne Studije
libertarian
homesteading
reparations
property rights
slavery
title Contra Horowitz: A Case for Reparations to Blacks for Slavery
title_full Contra Horowitz: A Case for Reparations to Blacks for Slavery
title_fullStr Contra Horowitz: A Case for Reparations to Blacks for Slavery
title_full_unstemmed Contra Horowitz: A Case for Reparations to Blacks for Slavery
title_short Contra Horowitz: A Case for Reparations to Blacks for Slavery
title_sort contra horowitz a case for reparations to blacks for slavery
topic libertarian
homesteading
reparations
property rights
slavery
url https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/416288
work_keys_str_mv AT jonpaulamos contrahorowitzacaseforreparationstoblacksforslavery
AT waltereblock contrahorowitzacaseforreparationstoblacksforslavery