Intermediate Crack Debonding of Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement—Comparison of Methods

Many researchers around the world have made extensive efforts to study the phenomenon of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) debonding. Based on these efforts, code provisions and various models have been proposed for predicting intermediate crack (IC) debonding failure. The paper presents a comparison o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paweł Tworzewski, Jeffrey K. Alexy, Robert W. Barnes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/20/7390
_version_ 1797471739083489280
author Paweł Tworzewski
Jeffrey K. Alexy
Robert W. Barnes
author_facet Paweł Tworzewski
Jeffrey K. Alexy
Robert W. Barnes
author_sort Paweł Tworzewski
collection DOAJ
description Many researchers around the world have made extensive efforts to study the phenomenon of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) debonding. Based on these efforts, code provisions and various models have been proposed for predicting intermediate crack (IC) debonding failure. The paper presents a comparison of seven selected models: <i>fib</i> bulletin 14 approach, Teng et al. model, Lu model, Seracino et al. model, Said and Wu model, Elsanadedy et al. model and ACI 440. The accuracy of each model was evaluated based on the test results of 58 flexural specimens with IC debonding failures of externally bonded (EB), carbon FRP plates or sheets found in the existing literature. The experimental database was prepared to include a wide range of parameters affecting the issue under consideration. A comparison of the measured and predicted load capacity values was made to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the considered models. The analysis included the limitation of the load capacity estimated based on IC debonding models as well as concrete crushing and FRP rupture types of failure. The results indicate that the latest models proposed for direct implementation in design guidelines—the Said and Wu model and the Elsanadedy et al. model—offer the best accuracy in predicting the load capacity. In contrast, the <i>fib</i> bulletin 14 approach shows a wide dispersion of predictions and a large proportion of highly overestimated results.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:53:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba3d3e73997649639c3f472e060423fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:53:25Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-ba3d3e73997649639c3f472e060423fc2023-11-24T01:06:03ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442022-10-011520739010.3390/ma15207390Intermediate Crack Debonding of Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement—Comparison of MethodsPaweł Tworzewski0Jeffrey K. Alexy1Robert W. Barnes2Department of Strength of Materials, Concrete and Bridge Structures, Kielce University of Technology, aleja Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, PolandBrown+Kubican Structural Engineers, 2224 Young Dr, Lexington, KY 40505, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 238 Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USAMany researchers around the world have made extensive efforts to study the phenomenon of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) debonding. Based on these efforts, code provisions and various models have been proposed for predicting intermediate crack (IC) debonding failure. The paper presents a comparison of seven selected models: <i>fib</i> bulletin 14 approach, Teng et al. model, Lu model, Seracino et al. model, Said and Wu model, Elsanadedy et al. model and ACI 440. The accuracy of each model was evaluated based on the test results of 58 flexural specimens with IC debonding failures of externally bonded (EB), carbon FRP plates or sheets found in the existing literature. The experimental database was prepared to include a wide range of parameters affecting the issue under consideration. A comparison of the measured and predicted load capacity values was made to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the considered models. The analysis included the limitation of the load capacity estimated based on IC debonding models as well as concrete crushing and FRP rupture types of failure. The results indicate that the latest models proposed for direct implementation in design guidelines—the Said and Wu model and the Elsanadedy et al. model—offer the best accuracy in predicting the load capacity. In contrast, the <i>fib</i> bulletin 14 approach shows a wide dispersion of predictions and a large proportion of highly overestimated results.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/20/7390debondingFRPRC beamsstrengtheningfailure modesEBR
spellingShingle Paweł Tworzewski
Jeffrey K. Alexy
Robert W. Barnes
Intermediate Crack Debonding of Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement—Comparison of Methods
Materials
debonding
FRP
RC beams
strengthening
failure modes
EBR
title Intermediate Crack Debonding of Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement—Comparison of Methods
title_full Intermediate Crack Debonding of Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement—Comparison of Methods
title_fullStr Intermediate Crack Debonding of Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement—Comparison of Methods
title_full_unstemmed Intermediate Crack Debonding of Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement—Comparison of Methods
title_short Intermediate Crack Debonding of Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement—Comparison of Methods
title_sort intermediate crack debonding of externally bonded frp reinforcement comparison of methods
topic debonding
FRP
RC beams
strengthening
failure modes
EBR
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/20/7390
work_keys_str_mv AT pawełtworzewski intermediatecrackdebondingofexternallybondedfrpreinforcementcomparisonofmethods
AT jeffreykalexy intermediatecrackdebondingofexternallybondedfrpreinforcementcomparisonofmethods
AT robertwbarnes intermediatecrackdebondingofexternallybondedfrpreinforcementcomparisonofmethods