Onomaziologické přístupy ke slovotvorbě
The paper aims to offer a description of major onomasiological theories of word-formation. It mainly focuses on the purely synchronic approaches of Dokulil (1962) and Štekauer (1998). A comparative analysis shows that although these approaches are perceived as part of the same onomasiological tradit...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ces |
| Published: |
Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta
2020-05-01
|
| Series: | Časopis pro Moderní Filologii |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://casopispromodernifilologii.ff.cuni.cz/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2019/07/Petr_Kos_-_Jana_Kozubikova_Sandova_7-23.pdf |
| Summary: | The paper aims to offer a description of major onomasiological theories of word-formation. It mainly focuses on the purely synchronic approaches of Dokulil (1962) and Štekauer (1998). A comparative analysis shows that although these approaches are perceived as part of the same onomasiological tradition, they differ in a number of major aspects and should thus be seen as fully autonomous theories. In order to provide a full account of the major onomasiological approaches to word-formation, the paper also describes the most important aspects of those that are on the borderline between word-formation, diachronic onomasiology, and lexicology, those by Blank (1997) and Koch (2001). In the conclusion of the paper, we suggest possible directions which further research in onomasiology may take. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0008-7386 2336-6591 |