| Summary: | Objective: analysis and comparison of legal categories” objects withdrawn from circulation”, “objects restricted in circulation” and “objects prohibited for circulation”. Methods: formal-logical, comparative method and method of cross-sectoral approach legal research. Results: basing on the analysis, certain restricted and withdrawn objects are defined. Two parameters of their differentiation are proposed. It is shown that the law concept of “objects prohibited for circulation” is used in the meaning of goods withdrawn from circulation. Scientific novelty: The author's criteria are proposed to differentiate objects of civil rights restricted and withdrawn from circulation. Practical value: Results of research can be used in law-making and law enforcement activity, as well as for scientific research in the field of civil turnover.
|
|---|