Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Tools and Patient Educational Material: A Systematic Review
Background: Individuals with kidney diseases have increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death. Online cardiovascular risk assessment tools can educate patients on risks and modifiable factors. Since patients have variable health literacy, we evaluated the readability, understandability and ac...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Karger Publishers
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Glomerular Diseases |
| Online Access: | https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/528118 |
| _version_ | 1828163909976064000 |
|---|---|
| author | Ashraf Roshan Jason Choo Cynthia Ciwei Lim |
| author_facet | Ashraf Roshan Jason Choo Cynthia Ciwei Lim |
| author_sort | Ashraf Roshan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Individuals with kidney diseases have increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death. Online cardiovascular risk assessment tools can educate patients on risks and modifiable factors. Since patients have variable health literacy, we evaluated the readability, understandability and actionability of publicly available online cardiovascular risk assessment tools.
Methods: We systematically searched, reviewed, characterized and assessed English-language cardiovascular risk assessment tools online for readability (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) score), understandability and actionability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for printable materials (PEMAT-P)).
Results: After screening 969 websites, 69 websites employing 76 risk tools were included. The most frequently used tools were the Framingham risk score (n= 13) and the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease score (n= 12), Most tools were intended for the general population and estimated the 10-year incident cardiovascular risk. Patient education was provided as targets for blood pressure (n= 17), lipids (n= 15), or glucose (n= 5); and advice regarding diet (n= 18), exercise (n= 19), and smoking cessation (n= 20). The median FKGL, PEMAT- understandability and actionability scores were 6.2 (4.7, 8.5), 84.6% (76.9%, 89.2%) and 60% (40%, 60%), respectively.
Conclusion: The online cardiovascular risk tools were generally easy to read and understand, but only a third provided education on risk modification. Judicious selection of an online cardiovascular risk assessment tool may help patients in self-management. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T01:16:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ba4d6f6518a54a87b6e744fbd3a300cc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2673-3633 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T01:16:52Z |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | Karger Publishers |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Glomerular Diseases |
| spelling | doaj.art-ba4d6f6518a54a87b6e744fbd3a300cc2022-12-22T03:53:56ZengKarger PublishersGlomerular Diseases2673-36332022-11-0110.1159/000528118528118Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Tools and Patient Educational Material: A Systematic ReviewAshraf RoshanJason Choohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8477-0875Cynthia Ciwei Limhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0021-4861Background: Individuals with kidney diseases have increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death. Online cardiovascular risk assessment tools can educate patients on risks and modifiable factors. Since patients have variable health literacy, we evaluated the readability, understandability and actionability of publicly available online cardiovascular risk assessment tools. Methods: We systematically searched, reviewed, characterized and assessed English-language cardiovascular risk assessment tools online for readability (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) score), understandability and actionability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for printable materials (PEMAT-P)). Results: After screening 969 websites, 69 websites employing 76 risk tools were included. The most frequently used tools were the Framingham risk score (n= 13) and the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease score (n= 12), Most tools were intended for the general population and estimated the 10-year incident cardiovascular risk. Patient education was provided as targets for blood pressure (n= 17), lipids (n= 15), or glucose (n= 5); and advice regarding diet (n= 18), exercise (n= 19), and smoking cessation (n= 20). The median FKGL, PEMAT- understandability and actionability scores were 6.2 (4.7, 8.5), 84.6% (76.9%, 89.2%) and 60% (40%, 60%), respectively. Conclusion: The online cardiovascular risk tools were generally easy to read and understand, but only a third provided education on risk modification. Judicious selection of an online cardiovascular risk assessment tool may help patients in self-management.https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/528118 |
| spellingShingle | Ashraf Roshan Jason Choo Cynthia Ciwei Lim Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Tools and Patient Educational Material: A Systematic Review Glomerular Diseases |
| title | Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Tools and Patient Educational Material: A Systematic Review |
| title_full | Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Tools and Patient Educational Material: A Systematic Review |
| title_fullStr | Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Tools and Patient Educational Material: A Systematic Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Tools and Patient Educational Material: A Systematic Review |
| title_short | Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Tools and Patient Educational Material: A Systematic Review |
| title_sort | readability understandability and actionability of online cardiovascular risk assessment tools and patient educational material a systematic review |
| url | https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/528118 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ashrafroshan readabilityunderstandabilityandactionabilityofonlinecardiovascularriskassessmenttoolsandpatienteducationalmaterialasystematicreview AT jasonchoo readabilityunderstandabilityandactionabilityofonlinecardiovascularriskassessmenttoolsandpatienteducationalmaterialasystematicreview AT cynthiaciweilim readabilityunderstandabilityandactionabilityofonlinecardiovascularriskassessmenttoolsandpatienteducationalmaterialasystematicreview |