Requisitos previos para que una Corte Suprema anule sus opiniones jurídicas vinculantes
The paper aims at developing recommendations for improving procedural laws and guiding case law related to reasons for a supreme court to overrule its universally binding legal opinions with a particular emphasis on relevant Ukrainian legal context as a perfectly illustrativ...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad del Zulia
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | Revista de la Universidad del Zulia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/rluz/article/view/40851 |
| _version_ | 1797644914396233728 |
|---|---|
| author | Yevhenii Doiar Pavlo Liutikov Vladyslav Lipynskyi Nataliya Kantor |
| author_facet | Yevhenii Doiar Pavlo Liutikov Vladyslav Lipynskyi Nataliya Kantor |
| author_sort | Yevhenii Doiar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The paper aims at developing recommendations for improving procedural laws and guiding case law related to reasons for a supreme court to overrule its universally binding legal opinions with a particular emphasis on relevant Ukrainian legal context as a perfectly illustrative example. This research purpose prompts the reliance on a set of appropriate scientific methods of descriptive and comparative law research including the comparative analysis itself as a fundamental instrument for review of relevant legal material, as well as the structural, analytical and law-in-context scientific methods. The paper covers, in particular, a)Ukrainian statutory framework and case law regulating of the Supreme Court of Ukraine's departure from its legal opinions; b)concepts of overrulingprecedents of the highest courts of the most developed countries with common law legal system; c)current views of scientific community and prospects of development of the relevant case lawon Supreme Court of Ukraineoverruling its legal opinions.The authors maintain that it is extremely important to substantiate compelling reasons for a supreme court to review its vision of the correct application of the Law, exposing the reasons for considering the previous one defective, to the extent that it leads tofundamental negative consequences |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T14:38:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ba62ffda2e0b4479abeb60d12951eeec |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2665-0428 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T14:38:19Z |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | Universidad del Zulia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista de la Universidad del Zulia |
| spelling | doaj.art-ba62ffda2e0b4479abeb60d12951eeec2023-10-31T01:49:34ZengUniversidad del ZuliaRevista de la Universidad del Zulia2665-04282023-08-011441593610https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.34Requisitos previos para que una Corte Suprema anule sus opiniones jurídicas vinculantesYevhenii Doiar0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8500-8789Pavlo Liutikov1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6173-0128Vladyslav Lipynskyi2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-3330Nataliya Kantor3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9533-0851University of Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine.University of Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine.University of Customs and Finance, Ukraine.Drohobych State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine.The paper aims at developing recommendations for improving procedural laws and guiding case law related to reasons for a supreme court to overrule its universally binding legal opinions with a particular emphasis on relevant Ukrainian legal context as a perfectly illustrative example. This research purpose prompts the reliance on a set of appropriate scientific methods of descriptive and comparative law research including the comparative analysis itself as a fundamental instrument for review of relevant legal material, as well as the structural, analytical and law-in-context scientific methods. The paper covers, in particular, a)Ukrainian statutory framework and case law regulating of the Supreme Court of Ukraine's departure from its legal opinions; b)concepts of overrulingprecedents of the highest courts of the most developed countries with common law legal system; c)current views of scientific community and prospects of development of the relevant case lawon Supreme Court of Ukraineoverruling its legal opinions.The authors maintain that it is extremely important to substantiate compelling reasons for a supreme court to review its vision of the correct application of the Law, exposing the reasons for considering the previous one defective, to the extent that it leads tofundamental negative consequenceshttps://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/rluz/article/view/40851administration of justicecase lawcomparative lawmodern lawsupreme courts |
| spellingShingle | Yevhenii Doiar Pavlo Liutikov Vladyslav Lipynskyi Nataliya Kantor Requisitos previos para que una Corte Suprema anule sus opiniones jurídicas vinculantes Revista de la Universidad del Zulia administration of justice case law comparative law modern law supreme courts |
| title | Requisitos previos para que una Corte Suprema anule sus opiniones jurídicas vinculantes |
| title_full | Requisitos previos para que una Corte Suprema anule sus opiniones jurídicas vinculantes |
| title_fullStr | Requisitos previos para que una Corte Suprema anule sus opiniones jurídicas vinculantes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Requisitos previos para que una Corte Suprema anule sus opiniones jurídicas vinculantes |
| title_short | Requisitos previos para que una Corte Suprema anule sus opiniones jurídicas vinculantes |
| title_sort | requisitos previos para que una corte suprema anule sus opiniones juridicas vinculantes |
| topic | administration of justice case law comparative law modern law supreme courts |
| url | https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/rluz/article/view/40851 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yevheniidoiar requisitospreviosparaqueunacortesupremaanulesusopinionesjuridicasvinculantes AT pavloliutikov requisitospreviosparaqueunacortesupremaanulesusopinionesjuridicasvinculantes AT vladyslavlipynskyi requisitospreviosparaqueunacortesupremaanulesusopinionesjuridicasvinculantes AT nataliyakantor requisitospreviosparaqueunacortesupremaanulesusopinionesjuridicasvinculantes |