Developing a dynamic HIV transmission model for 6 U.S. cities: An evidence synthesis.

<h4>Background</h4>Dynamic HIV transmission models can provide evidence-based guidance on optimal combination implementation strategies to treat and prevent HIV/AIDS. However, these models can be extremely data intensive, and the availability of good-quality data characterizing regional...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emanuel Krebs, Benjamin Enns, Linwei Wang, Xiao Zang, Dimitra Panagiotoglou, Carlos Del Rio, Julia Dombrowski, Daniel J Feaster, Matthew Golden, Reuben Granich, Brandon Marshall, Shruti H Mehta, Lisa Metsch, Bruce R Schackman, Steffanie A Strathdee, Bohdan Nosyk, localized HIV modeling study group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217559
_version_ 1818724958452318208
author Emanuel Krebs
Benjamin Enns
Linwei Wang
Xiao Zang
Dimitra Panagiotoglou
Carlos Del Rio
Julia Dombrowski
Daniel J Feaster
Matthew Golden
Reuben Granich
Brandon Marshall
Shruti H Mehta
Lisa Metsch
Bruce R Schackman
Steffanie A Strathdee
Bohdan Nosyk
localized HIV modeling study group
author_facet Emanuel Krebs
Benjamin Enns
Linwei Wang
Xiao Zang
Dimitra Panagiotoglou
Carlos Del Rio
Julia Dombrowski
Daniel J Feaster
Matthew Golden
Reuben Granich
Brandon Marshall
Shruti H Mehta
Lisa Metsch
Bruce R Schackman
Steffanie A Strathdee
Bohdan Nosyk
localized HIV modeling study group
author_sort Emanuel Krebs
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Dynamic HIV transmission models can provide evidence-based guidance on optimal combination implementation strategies to treat and prevent HIV/AIDS. However, these models can be extremely data intensive, and the availability of good-quality data characterizing regional microepidemics varies substantially within and across countries. We aim to provide a comprehensive and transparent description of an evidence synthesis process and reporting framework employed to populate and calibrate a dynamic, compartmental HIV transmission model for six US cities.<h4>Methods</h4>We executed a mixed-method evidence synthesis strategy to populate model parameters in six categories: (i) initial HIV-negative and HIV-infected populations; (ii) parameters used to calculate the probability of HIV transmission; (iii) screening, diagnosis, treatment and HIV disease progression; (iv) HIV prevention programs; (v) the costs of medical care; and (vi) health utility weights for each stage of HIV disease progression. We identified parameters that required city-specific data and stratification by gender, risk group and race/ethnicity a priori and sought out databases for primary analysis to augment our evidence synthesis. We ranked the quality of each parameter using context- and domain-specific criteria and verified sources and assumptions with our scientific advisory committee.<h4>Findings</h4>To inform the 1,667 parameters needed to populate our model, we synthesized evidence from 59 peer-reviewed publications and 24 public health and surveillance reports and executed primary analyses using 11 data sets. Of these 1,667 parameters, 1,517 (91%) were city-specific and 150 (9%) were common for all cities. Notably, 1,074 (64%), 201 (12%) and 312 (19%) parameters corresponded to categories (i), (ii) and (iii), respectively. Parameters ranked as best- to moderate-quality evidence comprised 39% of the common parameters and ranged from 56%-60% across cities for the city-specific parameters. We identified variation in parameter values across cities as well as within cities across risk and race/ethnic groups.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Better integration of modelling in decision making can be achieved by systematically reporting on the evidence synthesis process that is used to populate models, and by explicitly assessing the quality of data entered into the model. The effective communication of this process can help prioritize data collection of the most informative components of local HIV prevention and care services in order to reduce decision uncertainty and strengthen model conclusions.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T21:34:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba753153c99d410b95b586bd59ed5062
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T21:34:41Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ba753153c99d410b95b586bd59ed50622022-12-21T21:31:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01145e021755910.1371/journal.pone.0217559Developing a dynamic HIV transmission model for 6 U.S. cities: An evidence synthesis.Emanuel KrebsBenjamin EnnsLinwei WangXiao ZangDimitra PanagiotoglouCarlos Del RioJulia DombrowskiDaniel J FeasterMatthew GoldenReuben GranichBrandon MarshallShruti H MehtaLisa MetschBruce R SchackmanSteffanie A StrathdeeBohdan Nosyklocalized HIV modeling study group<h4>Background</h4>Dynamic HIV transmission models can provide evidence-based guidance on optimal combination implementation strategies to treat and prevent HIV/AIDS. However, these models can be extremely data intensive, and the availability of good-quality data characterizing regional microepidemics varies substantially within and across countries. We aim to provide a comprehensive and transparent description of an evidence synthesis process and reporting framework employed to populate and calibrate a dynamic, compartmental HIV transmission model for six US cities.<h4>Methods</h4>We executed a mixed-method evidence synthesis strategy to populate model parameters in six categories: (i) initial HIV-negative and HIV-infected populations; (ii) parameters used to calculate the probability of HIV transmission; (iii) screening, diagnosis, treatment and HIV disease progression; (iv) HIV prevention programs; (v) the costs of medical care; and (vi) health utility weights for each stage of HIV disease progression. We identified parameters that required city-specific data and stratification by gender, risk group and race/ethnicity a priori and sought out databases for primary analysis to augment our evidence synthesis. We ranked the quality of each parameter using context- and domain-specific criteria and verified sources and assumptions with our scientific advisory committee.<h4>Findings</h4>To inform the 1,667 parameters needed to populate our model, we synthesized evidence from 59 peer-reviewed publications and 24 public health and surveillance reports and executed primary analyses using 11 data sets. Of these 1,667 parameters, 1,517 (91%) were city-specific and 150 (9%) were common for all cities. Notably, 1,074 (64%), 201 (12%) and 312 (19%) parameters corresponded to categories (i), (ii) and (iii), respectively. Parameters ranked as best- to moderate-quality evidence comprised 39% of the common parameters and ranged from 56%-60% across cities for the city-specific parameters. We identified variation in parameter values across cities as well as within cities across risk and race/ethnic groups.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Better integration of modelling in decision making can be achieved by systematically reporting on the evidence synthesis process that is used to populate models, and by explicitly assessing the quality of data entered into the model. The effective communication of this process can help prioritize data collection of the most informative components of local HIV prevention and care services in order to reduce decision uncertainty and strengthen model conclusions.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217559
spellingShingle Emanuel Krebs
Benjamin Enns
Linwei Wang
Xiao Zang
Dimitra Panagiotoglou
Carlos Del Rio
Julia Dombrowski
Daniel J Feaster
Matthew Golden
Reuben Granich
Brandon Marshall
Shruti H Mehta
Lisa Metsch
Bruce R Schackman
Steffanie A Strathdee
Bohdan Nosyk
localized HIV modeling study group
Developing a dynamic HIV transmission model for 6 U.S. cities: An evidence synthesis.
PLoS ONE
title Developing a dynamic HIV transmission model for 6 U.S. cities: An evidence synthesis.
title_full Developing a dynamic HIV transmission model for 6 U.S. cities: An evidence synthesis.
title_fullStr Developing a dynamic HIV transmission model for 6 U.S. cities: An evidence synthesis.
title_full_unstemmed Developing a dynamic HIV transmission model for 6 U.S. cities: An evidence synthesis.
title_short Developing a dynamic HIV transmission model for 6 U.S. cities: An evidence synthesis.
title_sort developing a dynamic hiv transmission model for 6 u s cities an evidence synthesis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217559
work_keys_str_mv AT emanuelkrebs developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT benjaminenns developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT linweiwang developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT xiaozang developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT dimitrapanagiotoglou developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT carlosdelrio developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT juliadombrowski developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT danieljfeaster developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT matthewgolden developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT reubengranich developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT brandonmarshall developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT shrutihmehta developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT lisametsch developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT brucerschackman developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT steffanieastrathdee developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT bohdannosyk developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis
AT localizedhivmodelingstudygroup developingadynamichivtransmissionmodelfor6uscitiesanevidencesynthesis