Correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations – Implications for climate change assessments

Quantifying climate change impact on water resources systems at regional or catchment scales is important in water resources planning and management. General circulation models (GCMs) represent our main source of knowledge about future climate change. However, several key limitations restrict the di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashish Sharma, Rajeshwar Mehrotra, Cilcia Kusumastuti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IWA Publishing 2023-07-01
Series:Journal of Water and Climate Change
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jwcc.iwaponline.com/content/14/7/2085
_version_ 1797202765765672960
author Ashish Sharma
Rajeshwar Mehrotra
Cilcia Kusumastuti
author_facet Ashish Sharma
Rajeshwar Mehrotra
Cilcia Kusumastuti
author_sort Ashish Sharma
collection DOAJ
description Quantifying climate change impact on water resources systems at regional or catchment scales is important in water resources planning and management. General circulation models (GCMs) represent our main source of knowledge about future climate change. However, several key limitations restrict the direct use of GCM simulations for water resource assessments. In particular, the presence of systematic bias and the need for its correction is an essential pre-processing step that improves the quality of GCM simulations, making climate change impact assessments more robust and believable. What exactly is systematic bias? Can systematic bias be quantified if the model is asynchronous with observations or other model simulations? Should model bias be sub-categorized to focus on individual attributes of interest or aggregated to focus on lower moments alone? How would one address bias in multiple attributes without making the correction model complex? How could one be confident that corrected simulations for the yet-to-be-seen future bear a closer resemblance to the truth? How can one meaningfully extrapolate correction to multiple dimensions, without being impacted by the ‘Curse of Dimensionality’? These are some of the questions we attempt to address in the paper. HIGHLIGHTS Importance of procedures for correcting systematic biases is discussed.; Extensive literature is presented on bias correction and its use.; The importance of correcting specific attributes for water resources applications is illustrated.; Challenges in formulating a bias correction alternative are highlighted.; Added information on how correcting these biases is critical before any dynamical or statistical downscaling application.;
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:25:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba8b0efd51414971be2b7d76d2f95be4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2040-2244
2408-9354
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:08:39Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher IWA Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Water and Climate Change
spelling doaj.art-ba8b0efd51414971be2b7d76d2f95be42024-04-17T08:30:13ZengIWA PublishingJournal of Water and Climate Change2040-22442408-93542023-07-011472085210210.2166/wcc.2023.230230Correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations – Implications for climate change assessmentsAshish Sharma0Rajeshwar Mehrotra1Cilcia Kusumastuti2 Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia Quantifying climate change impact on water resources systems at regional or catchment scales is important in water resources planning and management. General circulation models (GCMs) represent our main source of knowledge about future climate change. However, several key limitations restrict the direct use of GCM simulations for water resource assessments. In particular, the presence of systematic bias and the need for its correction is an essential pre-processing step that improves the quality of GCM simulations, making climate change impact assessments more robust and believable. What exactly is systematic bias? Can systematic bias be quantified if the model is asynchronous with observations or other model simulations? Should model bias be sub-categorized to focus on individual attributes of interest or aggregated to focus on lower moments alone? How would one address bias in multiple attributes without making the correction model complex? How could one be confident that corrected simulations for the yet-to-be-seen future bear a closer resemblance to the truth? How can one meaningfully extrapolate correction to multiple dimensions, without being impacted by the ‘Curse of Dimensionality’? These are some of the questions we attempt to address in the paper. HIGHLIGHTS Importance of procedures for correcting systematic biases is discussed.; Extensive literature is presented on bias correction and its use.; The importance of correcting specific attributes for water resources applications is illustrated.; Challenges in formulating a bias correction alternative are highlighted.; Added information on how correcting these biases is critical before any dynamical or statistical downscaling application.;http://jwcc.iwaponline.com/content/14/7/2085climate changefuture climategeneral circulation modelssystematic biaswater resources systems
spellingShingle Ashish Sharma
Rajeshwar Mehrotra
Cilcia Kusumastuti
Correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations – Implications for climate change assessments
Journal of Water and Climate Change
climate change
future climate
general circulation models
systematic bias
water resources systems
title Correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations – Implications for climate change assessments
title_full Correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations – Implications for climate change assessments
title_fullStr Correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations – Implications for climate change assessments
title_full_unstemmed Correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations – Implications for climate change assessments
title_short Correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations – Implications for climate change assessments
title_sort correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations implications for climate change assessments
topic climate change
future climate
general circulation models
systematic bias
water resources systems
url http://jwcc.iwaponline.com/content/14/7/2085
work_keys_str_mv AT ashishsharma correctingsystematicbiasinderivedhydrologicsimulationsimplicationsforclimatechangeassessments
AT rajeshwarmehrotra correctingsystematicbiasinderivedhydrologicsimulationsimplicationsforclimatechangeassessments
AT cilciakusumastuti correctingsystematicbiasinderivedhydrologicsimulationsimplicationsforclimatechangeassessments