Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM 'TOPICS-MDS' in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study.

In shared decision making, the exploration of preferred personal health outcomes is important. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide input for discussions between patients and healthcare professionals. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS) PROM is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruth E Pel-Littel, Cynthia S Hofman, Liesje Yu, Silke F Metzelthin, Franca H Leeuwis, Jeanet W Blom, B M Buurman, Mirella M Minkman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225344
_version_ 1818985770841538560
author Ruth E Pel-Littel
Cynthia S Hofman
Liesje Yu
Silke F Metzelthin
Franca H Leeuwis
Jeanet W Blom
B M Buurman
Mirella M Minkman
author_facet Ruth E Pel-Littel
Cynthia S Hofman
Liesje Yu
Silke F Metzelthin
Franca H Leeuwis
Jeanet W Blom
B M Buurman
Mirella M Minkman
author_sort Ruth E Pel-Littel
collection DOAJ
description In shared decision making, the exploration of preferred personal health outcomes is important. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide input for discussions between patients and healthcare professionals. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS) PROM is a multidimensional questionnaire on the physical and mental health and wellbeing of older adults. This study investigates how the TOPICS-MDS could be used in individual healthcare conversations. We explored views of older adults regarding 1) whether the health domains they want to discuss are included in the TOPICS-MDS and 2) the comprehensibility of the TOPICS-MDS for healthcare conversations with older adults. A three-round Delphi study was conducted. A total of 57 older adults participated in the study, the mean (SD) age was 71.5 (8.5) years, and 78.9% of the participants were female. The participants were divided into four panels based on educational level and cultural background. We used online questionnaires and focus groups. Consensus was pre-defined to be the point when ≥75% of the participants agreed that a domain was important or very important (scored on a 5-point Likert scale). The inter-expert agreement was computed for Round 1 and 3 with Kendall's W. Round 2 was a focus-group. Qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis. Older adults considered 'functional limitations', 'emotional wellbeing', 'social functioning' and 'quality of life' to be important domains of the TOPICS-MDS to discuss in healthcare conversations. The participants added 'coping with stress', 'dealing with health conditions and the effects on life' as extra domains for healthcare conversations. Challenges regarding the comprehensibility of the TOPICS-MDS included difficult words and lengthy or sensitive questions. Questions that included multiple topics were difficult to understand. The TOPICS-MDS covers the domains of life that older adults value as important to discuss with healthcare professionals, and two additional domains were identified. For older adults with a low level of education or a culturally diverse background, the TOPICS-MDS needs to be adjusted for comprehensibility.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T18:40:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba8c7f4ecb544b7295b8db88f9f8083d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T18:40:11Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ba8c7f4ecb544b7295b8db88f9f8083d2022-12-21T19:29:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011411e022534410.1371/journal.pone.0225344Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM 'TOPICS-MDS' in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study.Ruth E Pel-LittelCynthia S HofmanLiesje YuSilke F MetzelthinFranca H LeeuwisJeanet W BlomB M BuurmanMirella M MinkmanIn shared decision making, the exploration of preferred personal health outcomes is important. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide input for discussions between patients and healthcare professionals. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS) PROM is a multidimensional questionnaire on the physical and mental health and wellbeing of older adults. This study investigates how the TOPICS-MDS could be used in individual healthcare conversations. We explored views of older adults regarding 1) whether the health domains they want to discuss are included in the TOPICS-MDS and 2) the comprehensibility of the TOPICS-MDS for healthcare conversations with older adults. A three-round Delphi study was conducted. A total of 57 older adults participated in the study, the mean (SD) age was 71.5 (8.5) years, and 78.9% of the participants were female. The participants were divided into four panels based on educational level and cultural background. We used online questionnaires and focus groups. Consensus was pre-defined to be the point when ≥75% of the participants agreed that a domain was important or very important (scored on a 5-point Likert scale). The inter-expert agreement was computed for Round 1 and 3 with Kendall's W. Round 2 was a focus-group. Qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis. Older adults considered 'functional limitations', 'emotional wellbeing', 'social functioning' and 'quality of life' to be important domains of the TOPICS-MDS to discuss in healthcare conversations. The participants added 'coping with stress', 'dealing with health conditions and the effects on life' as extra domains for healthcare conversations. Challenges regarding the comprehensibility of the TOPICS-MDS included difficult words and lengthy or sensitive questions. Questions that included multiple topics were difficult to understand. The TOPICS-MDS covers the domains of life that older adults value as important to discuss with healthcare professionals, and two additional domains were identified. For older adults with a low level of education or a culturally diverse background, the TOPICS-MDS needs to be adjusted for comprehensibility.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225344
spellingShingle Ruth E Pel-Littel
Cynthia S Hofman
Liesje Yu
Silke F Metzelthin
Franca H Leeuwis
Jeanet W Blom
B M Buurman
Mirella M Minkman
Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM 'TOPICS-MDS' in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study.
PLoS ONE
title Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM 'TOPICS-MDS' in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study.
title_full Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM 'TOPICS-MDS' in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study.
title_fullStr Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM 'TOPICS-MDS' in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study.
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM 'TOPICS-MDS' in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study.
title_short Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM 'TOPICS-MDS' in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study.
title_sort recommendations of older adults on how to use the prom topics mds in healthcare conversations a delphi study
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225344
work_keys_str_mv AT ruthepellittel recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy
AT cynthiashofman recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy
AT liesjeyu recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy
AT silkefmetzelthin recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy
AT francahleeuwis recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy
AT jeanetwblom recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy
AT bmbuurman recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy
AT mirellamminkman recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy