Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer
Purpose: This study aimed to test the clinical efficacy of a portable smartphone-based App assisted semen analysis (SA) system, O'VIEW-M PRO® to clinically accurate in comparison with results of laboratory-based conventional semen analyses including manual microscopic and computer-assisted seme...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Urological Association
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Investigative and Clinical Urology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20210266 |
_version_ | 1828952042366828544 |
---|---|
author | Min Jung Park Mi Young Lim Hyun Jun Park Nam Cheol Park |
author_facet | Min Jung Park Mi Young Lim Hyun Jun Park Nam Cheol Park |
author_sort | Min Jung Park |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose: This study aimed to test the clinical efficacy of a portable smartphone-based App assisted semen analysis (SA) system, O'VIEW-M PRO® to clinically accurate in comparison with results of laboratory-based conventional semen analyses including manual microscopic and computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) for self-evaluation of seminal parameters.
Materials and Methods: From January to May 2021, a total of 39 semen samples were analyzed for the sperm concentration and motility with new smartphone-based App assisted semen analyzer, O'VIEW-M PRO®, and results compared with those from laboratory-based manual microscopic SA with Makler Counting Chamber and CASA.
Results: The coefficient factors among the results of the measurement with Makler chamber and laboratory-based CASA comparing to O'VIEW-M PRO® were 0.666 and 0.655 for sperm density, 0.662 and 0.658 for sperm motility, respectively. There were no particular problems with clinical use of the O'VIEW-M PRO®. Device performance in classifying samples is positive (<15×106 sperm/mL) and negative (>15×106 sperm/mL) for sperm concentration criteria, and positive (<40%) and negative (>40%) for sperm motility criteria. The smartphone-based App assisted SA O'VIEW-M PRO® showed a sensitivity of 92.6%, a specificity of 66.7%, and overall accuracy rate of 84.6%.
Conclusions: This study shows a novel smartphone-based App assisted SA system. O'VIEW-M PRO® can easily obtain semen parameter information through self-diagnosis at home and induce infertile men's treatment and help patients after receiving infertile men's treatment before receiving treatment. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T06:47:19Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ba8ede503d6e4bdbbb8ea00513c4f47e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2466-0493 2466-054X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T06:47:19Z |
publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
publisher | Korean Urological Association |
record_format | Article |
series | Investigative and Clinical Urology |
spelling | doaj.art-ba8ede503d6e4bdbbb8ea00513c4f47e2022-12-21T23:13:00ZengKorean Urological AssociationInvestigative and Clinical Urology2466-04932466-054X2021-11-0162667268010.4111/icu.20210266Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzerMin Jung Park0Mi Young Lim1Hyun Jun Park 2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0566-9574Nam Cheol Park3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2735-9278The Korea Institute for Public Sperm Bank, Busan, Korea.Department of Urology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.Department of Urology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.Department of Urology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.Purpose: This study aimed to test the clinical efficacy of a portable smartphone-based App assisted semen analysis (SA) system, O'VIEW-M PRO® to clinically accurate in comparison with results of laboratory-based conventional semen analyses including manual microscopic and computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) for self-evaluation of seminal parameters. Materials and Methods: From January to May 2021, a total of 39 semen samples were analyzed for the sperm concentration and motility with new smartphone-based App assisted semen analyzer, O'VIEW-M PRO®, and results compared with those from laboratory-based manual microscopic SA with Makler Counting Chamber and CASA. Results: The coefficient factors among the results of the measurement with Makler chamber and laboratory-based CASA comparing to O'VIEW-M PRO® were 0.666 and 0.655 for sperm density, 0.662 and 0.658 for sperm motility, respectively. There were no particular problems with clinical use of the O'VIEW-M PRO®. Device performance in classifying samples is positive (<15×106 sperm/mL) and negative (>15×106 sperm/mL) for sperm concentration criteria, and positive (<40%) and negative (>40%) for sperm motility criteria. The smartphone-based App assisted SA O'VIEW-M PRO® showed a sensitivity of 92.6%, a specificity of 66.7%, and overall accuracy rate of 84.6%. Conclusions: This study shows a novel smartphone-based App assisted SA system. O'VIEW-M PRO® can easily obtain semen parameter information through self-diagnosis at home and induce infertile men's treatment and help patients after receiving infertile men's treatment before receiving treatment.https://icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20210266male infertilitysemen analysissmartphonesperm count |
spellingShingle | Min Jung Park Mi Young Lim Hyun Jun Park Nam Cheol Park Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer Investigative and Clinical Urology male infertility semen analysis smartphone sperm count |
title | Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer |
title_full | Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer |
title_fullStr | Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer |
title_short | Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer |
title_sort | accuracy comparison study of new smartphone based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer |
topic | male infertility semen analysis smartphone sperm count |
url | https://icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20210266 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minjungpark accuracycomparisonstudyofnewsmartphonebasedsemenanalyzerversuslaboratoryspermqualityanalyzer AT miyounglim accuracycomparisonstudyofnewsmartphonebasedsemenanalyzerversuslaboratoryspermqualityanalyzer AT hyunjunpark accuracycomparisonstudyofnewsmartphonebasedsemenanalyzerversuslaboratoryspermqualityanalyzer AT namcheolpark accuracycomparisonstudyofnewsmartphonebasedsemenanalyzerversuslaboratoryspermqualityanalyzer |