Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen

Question addressed by study Administration of aerosol to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) ranges from concurrent aerosol delivery by mouthpiece to aerosol via cannula alone. This study examines the conditions to provide optimal aerosol delivery with low- or high-flow nasal oxygen wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barry Murphy, Marc Mac Giolla Eain, Mary Joyce, James B. Fink, Ronan MacLoughlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Respiratory Society 2022-10-01
Series:ERJ Open Research
Online Access:http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/8/4/00220-2022.full
_version_ 1797809454483243008
author Barry Murphy
Marc Mac Giolla Eain
Mary Joyce
James B. Fink
Ronan MacLoughlin
author_facet Barry Murphy
Marc Mac Giolla Eain
Mary Joyce
James B. Fink
Ronan MacLoughlin
author_sort Barry Murphy
collection DOAJ
description Question addressed by study Administration of aerosol to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) ranges from concurrent aerosol delivery by mouthpiece to aerosol via cannula alone. This study examines the conditions to provide optimal aerosol delivery with low- or high-flow nasal oxygen with concurrent mouthpiece or through nasal cannula alone, and the impact on fugitive aerosols. Materials and methods A vibrating mesh nebuliser delivered salbutamol via mouthpiece, aerosol holding chamber and nasal cannula to an adult head model simulating relaxed breathing. The mean±sd inhaled dose (%) was assayed from a filter distal to the trachea. Optical particle sizers were used to measure fugitive aerosol concentrations during aerosol delivery. Results Concurrent low-flow nasal oxygen (LFNO) and aerosol delivery with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber increased the inhaled dose (%) available, 31.44±1.33% when supplemented with 2 L·min−1 of nasal oxygen. Concurrent HFNO above 30 L·min−1 resulted in a lower inhaled dose (%) compared to aerosol delivered through HFNO alone. The addition of concurrent LFNO or HFNO resulted in no increase in aerosol levels in the test room. Answer to question posed Concurrent LFNO with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber is an effective and safe means of aerosol delivery.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T06:53:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba98fcf164ce491da5cc33967a72df67
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2312-0541
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T06:53:03Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format Article
series ERJ Open Research
spelling doaj.art-ba98fcf164ce491da5cc33967a72df672023-06-07T13:30:36ZengEuropean Respiratory SocietyERJ Open Research2312-05412022-10-018410.1183/23120541.00220-202200220-2022Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygenBarry Murphy0Marc Mac Giolla Eain1Mary Joyce2James B. Fink3Ronan MacLoughlin4 Research and Development, Science & Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Limited, Galway, Ireland Research and Development, Science & Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Limited, Galway, Ireland Research and Development, Science & Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Limited, Galway, Ireland Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, CA, USA Research and Development, Science & Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Limited, Galway, Ireland Question addressed by study Administration of aerosol to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) ranges from concurrent aerosol delivery by mouthpiece to aerosol via cannula alone. This study examines the conditions to provide optimal aerosol delivery with low- or high-flow nasal oxygen with concurrent mouthpiece or through nasal cannula alone, and the impact on fugitive aerosols. Materials and methods A vibrating mesh nebuliser delivered salbutamol via mouthpiece, aerosol holding chamber and nasal cannula to an adult head model simulating relaxed breathing. The mean±sd inhaled dose (%) was assayed from a filter distal to the trachea. Optical particle sizers were used to measure fugitive aerosol concentrations during aerosol delivery. Results Concurrent low-flow nasal oxygen (LFNO) and aerosol delivery with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber increased the inhaled dose (%) available, 31.44±1.33% when supplemented with 2 L·min−1 of nasal oxygen. Concurrent HFNO above 30 L·min−1 resulted in a lower inhaled dose (%) compared to aerosol delivered through HFNO alone. The addition of concurrent LFNO or HFNO resulted in no increase in aerosol levels in the test room. Answer to question posed Concurrent LFNO with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber is an effective and safe means of aerosol delivery.http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/8/4/00220-2022.full
spellingShingle Barry Murphy
Marc Mac Giolla Eain
Mary Joyce
James B. Fink
Ronan MacLoughlin
Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
ERJ Open Research
title Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title_full Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title_fullStr Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title_short Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title_sort evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low and high flow nasal oxygen
url http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/8/4/00220-2022.full
work_keys_str_mv AT barrymurphy evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen
AT marcmacgiollaeain evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen
AT maryjoyce evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen
AT jamesbfink evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen
AT ronanmacloughlin evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen