How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”

In health policy-making, various deliberative mechanisms can be used to engage the members of the public in exploring what might be a reasonable course of action. Scurr et al take power dynamics into consideration to analyse a deliberative dialogue involving stakeholders with diverse points of view....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jaime Jiménez-Pernett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2023-12-01
Series:International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4416_eca45647879b2826fcfd549e48405308.pdf
_version_ 1797206267788263424
author Jaime Jiménez-Pernett
author_facet Jaime Jiménez-Pernett
author_sort Jaime Jiménez-Pernett
collection DOAJ
description In health policy-making, various deliberative mechanisms can be used to engage the members of the public in exploring what might be a reasonable course of action. Scurr et al take power dynamics into consideration to analyse a deliberative dialogue involving stakeholders with diverse points of view. Given such asymmetries at play, the conclusions of deliberations could be biased. Scholars would benefit from guidance on designing and evaluating deliberative processes. This commentary aims to broadly reflect on the possible sources of power and information asymmetries in deliberative dialogues, and to bring the biographical resources approach to deal with such asymmetries.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:04:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba99c7c31b6a4541b7723cf0aaa85d7b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-5939
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:04:18Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series International Journal of Health Policy and Management
spelling doaj.art-ba99c7c31b6a4541b7723cf0aaa85d7b2024-04-15T19:04:26ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392023-12-0112Issue 11310.34172/ijhpm.2023.77014416How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”Jaime Jiménez-Pernett0International Health Department, Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, SpainIn health policy-making, various deliberative mechanisms can be used to engage the members of the public in exploring what might be a reasonable course of action. Scurr et al take power dynamics into consideration to analyse a deliberative dialogue involving stakeholders with diverse points of view. Given such asymmetries at play, the conclusions of deliberations could be biased. Scholars would benefit from guidance on designing and evaluating deliberative processes. This commentary aims to broadly reflect on the possible sources of power and information asymmetries in deliberative dialogues, and to bring the biographical resources approach to deal with such asymmetries.https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4416_eca45647879b2826fcfd549e48405308.pdfpublic engagementdeliberative methodsinequalitiesequitymeasurementpower imbalances 
spellingShingle Jaime Jiménez-Pernett
How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
public engagement
deliberative methods
inequalities
equity
measurement
power imbalances 
title How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
title_full How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
title_fullStr How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
title_full_unstemmed How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
title_short How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
title_sort how to account for asymmetries in deliberative dialogues comment on evaluating public participation in a deliberative dialogue a single case study
topic public engagement
deliberative methods
inequalities
equity
measurement
power imbalances 
url https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4416_eca45647879b2826fcfd549e48405308.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jaimejimenezpernett howtoaccountforasymmetriesindeliberativedialoguescommentonevaluatingpublicparticipationinadeliberativedialogueasinglecasestudy