How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
In health policy-making, various deliberative mechanisms can be used to engage the members of the public in exploring what might be a reasonable course of action. Scurr et al take power dynamics into consideration to analyse a deliberative dialogue involving stakeholders with diverse points of view....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2023-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4416_eca45647879b2826fcfd549e48405308.pdf |
_version_ | 1797206267788263424 |
---|---|
author | Jaime Jiménez-Pernett |
author_facet | Jaime Jiménez-Pernett |
author_sort | Jaime Jiménez-Pernett |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In health policy-making, various deliberative mechanisms can be used to engage the members of the public in exploring what might be a reasonable course of action. Scurr et al take power dynamics into consideration to analyse a deliberative dialogue involving stakeholders with diverse points of view. Given such asymmetries at play, the conclusions of deliberations could be biased. Scholars would benefit from guidance on designing and evaluating deliberative processes. This commentary aims to broadly reflect on the possible sources of power and information asymmetries in deliberative dialogues, and to bring the biographical resources approach to deal with such asymmetries. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T09:04:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ba99c7c31b6a4541b7723cf0aaa85d7b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2322-5939 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T09:04:18Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
spelling | doaj.art-ba99c7c31b6a4541b7723cf0aaa85d7b2024-04-15T19:04:26ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392023-12-0112Issue 11310.34172/ijhpm.2023.77014416How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”Jaime Jiménez-Pernett0International Health Department, Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, SpainIn health policy-making, various deliberative mechanisms can be used to engage the members of the public in exploring what might be a reasonable course of action. Scurr et al take power dynamics into consideration to analyse a deliberative dialogue involving stakeholders with diverse points of view. Given such asymmetries at play, the conclusions of deliberations could be biased. Scholars would benefit from guidance on designing and evaluating deliberative processes. This commentary aims to broadly reflect on the possible sources of power and information asymmetries in deliberative dialogues, and to bring the biographical resources approach to deal with such asymmetries.https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4416_eca45647879b2826fcfd549e48405308.pdfpublic engagementdeliberative methodsinequalitiesequitymeasurementpower imbalances |
spellingShingle | Jaime Jiménez-Pernett How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” International Journal of Health Policy and Management public engagement deliberative methods inequalities equity measurement power imbalances |
title | How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” |
title_full | How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” |
title_fullStr | How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” |
title_short | How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” |
title_sort | how to account for asymmetries in deliberative dialogues comment on evaluating public participation in a deliberative dialogue a single case study |
topic | public engagement deliberative methods inequalities equity measurement power imbalances |
url | https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4416_eca45647879b2826fcfd549e48405308.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaimejimenezpernett howtoaccountforasymmetriesindeliberativedialoguescommentonevaluatingpublicparticipationinadeliberativedialogueasinglecasestudy |