A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty

Abstract Background Leg length discrepancy (LLD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a known source of complications and a leading cause of litigation (J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:155–157, 2005). There are limited studies investigating surgical approach combined with the use of fluoroscopy intraoperat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henry Dunn, Geoff Rohlfing, Robert Kollmorgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-11-01
Series:Arthroplasty
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42836-020-00051-7
_version_ 1818341185050116096
author Henry Dunn
Geoff Rohlfing
Robert Kollmorgen
author_facet Henry Dunn
Geoff Rohlfing
Robert Kollmorgen
author_sort Henry Dunn
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Leg length discrepancy (LLD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a known source of complications and a leading cause of litigation (J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:155–157, 2005). There are limited studies investigating surgical approach combined with the use of fluoroscopy intraoperatively and their potential effects on LLD after THA. The purpose of this study was to compare the direct anterior (DA) approach utilizing a fluoroscopic overlay technique and anterolateral (AL) approach and their potential effect on LLD. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 121 patients who had undergone primary THA from September 1, 2016 to November 1, 2018 by either DA or AL approach by two separate surgeons. Leg length discrepancies were measured on pre-operative post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and on post-operative low anterior/posterior (AP) pelvis plain radiographs by two investigators blinded to each other’s measurements. To confirm inter-observer and intra-observer reliability between LLD measurements amongst investigators, a Pearson correlation test was performed. The primary outcome measurement was leg length discrepancy (LLD). Results We observed LLD > 1.0 cm and LLD > 1.5 cm in the DA and AL groups. The DA approach group showed a mean LLD of 4.5 mm against 7.76 mm in the AL group (p < 0.00001). There was a significantly higher rate of LLD in the AL group as compared to the DA group (LLD> 1 cm (28% vs. 8%, p = 0.0037) and LLD > 1.5 cm (7% vs. 0%, p = 0.0096). The LLD measurements showed strong correlation in terms of inter-observer (r = 0.95) and intra-observer reliability (r = 0.99) between the two investigators (p < 0.001). Conclusion In our patient cohort, the DA approach with fluoroscopic overlay technique had less LLD in comparison with the AL approach, suggesting that intraoperative fluoroscopic use does have an impact on LLD.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:54:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bab0e92a47b8426aaecdbb79ddbff060
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2524-7948
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:54:46Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Arthroplasty
spelling doaj.art-bab0e92a47b8426aaecdbb79ddbff0602022-12-21T23:39:20ZengBMCArthroplasty2524-79482020-11-01211610.1186/s42836-020-00051-7A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplastyHenry Dunn0Geoff Rohlfing1Robert Kollmorgen2UCSF FresnoUCSF FresnoUCSF FresnoAbstract Background Leg length discrepancy (LLD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a known source of complications and a leading cause of litigation (J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:155–157, 2005). There are limited studies investigating surgical approach combined with the use of fluoroscopy intraoperatively and their potential effects on LLD after THA. The purpose of this study was to compare the direct anterior (DA) approach utilizing a fluoroscopic overlay technique and anterolateral (AL) approach and their potential effect on LLD. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 121 patients who had undergone primary THA from September 1, 2016 to November 1, 2018 by either DA or AL approach by two separate surgeons. Leg length discrepancies were measured on pre-operative post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and on post-operative low anterior/posterior (AP) pelvis plain radiographs by two investigators blinded to each other’s measurements. To confirm inter-observer and intra-observer reliability between LLD measurements amongst investigators, a Pearson correlation test was performed. The primary outcome measurement was leg length discrepancy (LLD). Results We observed LLD > 1.0 cm and LLD > 1.5 cm in the DA and AL groups. The DA approach group showed a mean LLD of 4.5 mm against 7.76 mm in the AL group (p < 0.00001). There was a significantly higher rate of LLD in the AL group as compared to the DA group (LLD> 1 cm (28% vs. 8%, p = 0.0037) and LLD > 1.5 cm (7% vs. 0%, p = 0.0096). The LLD measurements showed strong correlation in terms of inter-observer (r = 0.95) and intra-observer reliability (r = 0.99) between the two investigators (p < 0.001). Conclusion In our patient cohort, the DA approach with fluoroscopic overlay technique had less LLD in comparison with the AL approach, suggesting that intraoperative fluoroscopic use does have an impact on LLD.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42836-020-00051-7Leg length discrepancyDirect anterior approachAnterolateral approachPrimary total hip arthroplastyIntraoperative fluoroscopyOverlay technique
spellingShingle Henry Dunn
Geoff Rohlfing
Robert Kollmorgen
A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty
Arthroplasty
Leg length discrepancy
Direct anterior approach
Anterolateral approach
Primary total hip arthroplasty
Intraoperative fluoroscopy
Overlay technique
title A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty
title_full A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty
title_short A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty
title_sort comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty
topic Leg length discrepancy
Direct anterior approach
Anterolateral approach
Primary total hip arthroplasty
Intraoperative fluoroscopy
Overlay technique
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42836-020-00051-7
work_keys_str_mv AT henrydunn acomparisonofleglengthdiscrepancybetweendirectanteriorandanterolateralapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty
AT geoffrohlfing acomparisonofleglengthdiscrepancybetweendirectanteriorandanterolateralapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty
AT robertkollmorgen acomparisonofleglengthdiscrepancybetweendirectanteriorandanterolateralapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty
AT henrydunn comparisonofleglengthdiscrepancybetweendirectanteriorandanterolateralapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty
AT geoffrohlfing comparisonofleglengthdiscrepancybetweendirectanteriorandanterolateralapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty
AT robertkollmorgen comparisonofleglengthdiscrepancybetweendirectanteriorandanterolateralapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty