Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study
Purpose: Correctly classifying distal femur fractures is essential for surgical treatment planning and patient prognosis. This study assesses the potential of Cinematic Rendering (CR) in classifying these fractures, emphasizing its reported ability to produce more realistic images than Volume Render...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1335759/full |
_version_ | 1797362262056370176 |
---|---|
author | Song Chen Xiong Wang Zhenxin Zheng Zhiqiang Fu |
author_facet | Song Chen Xiong Wang Zhenxin Zheng Zhiqiang Fu |
author_sort | Song Chen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose: Correctly classifying distal femur fractures is essential for surgical treatment planning and patient prognosis. This study assesses the potential of Cinematic Rendering (CR) in classifying these fractures, emphasizing its reported ability to produce more realistic images than Volume Rendering (VR).Methods: Data from 88 consecutive patients with distal femoral fractures collected between July 2013 and July 2020 were included. Two orthopedic surgeons independently evaluated the fractures using CR and VR. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement was evaluated by using the Cicchetti-Allison weighted Kappa method. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were also calculated. Diagnostic confidence scores (DCSs) for both imaging methods were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests.Results: CR reconstruction yielded excellent inter-observer (Kappa = 0.989) and intra-observer (Kappa = 0.992) agreement, outperforming VR (Kappa = 0.941 and 0.905, respectively). While metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were higher for CR, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, DCAs significantly favored CR (p < 0.05).Conclusion: CR offers a superior visualization of distal femur fractures than VR. It enhances fracture classification accuracy and bolsters diagnostic confidence. The high inter- and intra-observer agreement underscores its reliability, suggesting its potential clinical importance. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T16:05:48Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-babde2e8b8dc46c2b29c25cf5eb0710e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-4185 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T16:05:48Z |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
spelling | doaj.art-babde2e8b8dc46c2b29c25cf5eb0710e2024-01-08T06:32:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852024-01-011110.3389/fbioe.2023.13357591335759Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center studySong Chen0Xiong Wang1Zhenxin Zheng2Zhiqiang Fu3Department of Orthopedics, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Baoshan Luodian Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, ChinaPurpose: Correctly classifying distal femur fractures is essential for surgical treatment planning and patient prognosis. This study assesses the potential of Cinematic Rendering (CR) in classifying these fractures, emphasizing its reported ability to produce more realistic images than Volume Rendering (VR).Methods: Data from 88 consecutive patients with distal femoral fractures collected between July 2013 and July 2020 were included. Two orthopedic surgeons independently evaluated the fractures using CR and VR. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement was evaluated by using the Cicchetti-Allison weighted Kappa method. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were also calculated. Diagnostic confidence scores (DCSs) for both imaging methods were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests.Results: CR reconstruction yielded excellent inter-observer (Kappa = 0.989) and intra-observer (Kappa = 0.992) agreement, outperforming VR (Kappa = 0.941 and 0.905, respectively). While metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were higher for CR, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, DCAs significantly favored CR (p < 0.05).Conclusion: CR offers a superior visualization of distal femur fractures than VR. It enhances fracture classification accuracy and bolsters diagnostic confidence. The high inter- and intra-observer agreement underscores its reliability, suggesting its potential clinical importance.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1335759/fulldistal femur fractureAO/OTA classificationcinematic renderingvolume renderingdiagnostic confidence |
spellingShingle | Song Chen Xiong Wang Zhenxin Zheng Zhiqiang Fu Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology distal femur fracture AO/OTA classification cinematic rendering volume rendering diagnostic confidence |
title | Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study |
title_full | Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study |
title_fullStr | Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study |
title_short | Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study |
title_sort | cinematic rendering improves the ao ota classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering a retrospective single center study |
topic | distal femur fracture AO/OTA classification cinematic rendering volume rendering diagnostic confidence |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1335759/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songchen cinematicrenderingimprovestheaootaclassificationofdistalfemurfracturescomparedtovolumerenderingaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT xiongwang cinematicrenderingimprovestheaootaclassificationofdistalfemurfracturescomparedtovolumerenderingaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT zhenxinzheng cinematicrenderingimprovestheaootaclassificationofdistalfemurfracturescomparedtovolumerenderingaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT zhiqiangfu cinematicrenderingimprovestheaootaclassificationofdistalfemurfracturescomparedtovolumerenderingaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy |