Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study

Purpose: Correctly classifying distal femur fractures is essential for surgical treatment planning and patient prognosis. This study assesses the potential of Cinematic Rendering (CR) in classifying these fractures, emphasizing its reported ability to produce more realistic images than Volume Render...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Song Chen, Xiong Wang, Zhenxin Zheng, Zhiqiang Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1335759/full
_version_ 1797362262056370176
author Song Chen
Xiong Wang
Zhenxin Zheng
Zhiqiang Fu
author_facet Song Chen
Xiong Wang
Zhenxin Zheng
Zhiqiang Fu
author_sort Song Chen
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Correctly classifying distal femur fractures is essential for surgical treatment planning and patient prognosis. This study assesses the potential of Cinematic Rendering (CR) in classifying these fractures, emphasizing its reported ability to produce more realistic images than Volume Rendering (VR).Methods: Data from 88 consecutive patients with distal femoral fractures collected between July 2013 and July 2020 were included. Two orthopedic surgeons independently evaluated the fractures using CR and VR. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement was evaluated by using the Cicchetti-Allison weighted Kappa method. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were also calculated. Diagnostic confidence scores (DCSs) for both imaging methods were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests.Results: CR reconstruction yielded excellent inter-observer (Kappa = 0.989) and intra-observer (Kappa = 0.992) agreement, outperforming VR (Kappa = 0.941 and 0.905, respectively). While metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were higher for CR, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, DCAs significantly favored CR (p < 0.05).Conclusion: CR offers a superior visualization of distal femur fractures than VR. It enhances fracture classification accuracy and bolsters diagnostic confidence. The high inter- and intra-observer agreement underscores its reliability, suggesting its potential clinical importance.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T16:05:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-babde2e8b8dc46c2b29c25cf5eb0710e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-4185
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T16:05:48Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj.art-babde2e8b8dc46c2b29c25cf5eb0710e2024-01-08T06:32:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852024-01-011110.3389/fbioe.2023.13357591335759Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center studySong Chen0Xiong Wang1Zhenxin Zheng2Zhiqiang Fu3Department of Orthopedics, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Baoshan Luodian Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, ChinaPurpose: Correctly classifying distal femur fractures is essential for surgical treatment planning and patient prognosis. This study assesses the potential of Cinematic Rendering (CR) in classifying these fractures, emphasizing its reported ability to produce more realistic images than Volume Rendering (VR).Methods: Data from 88 consecutive patients with distal femoral fractures collected between July 2013 and July 2020 were included. Two orthopedic surgeons independently evaluated the fractures using CR and VR. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement was evaluated by using the Cicchetti-Allison weighted Kappa method. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were also calculated. Diagnostic confidence scores (DCSs) for both imaging methods were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests.Results: CR reconstruction yielded excellent inter-observer (Kappa = 0.989) and intra-observer (Kappa = 0.992) agreement, outperforming VR (Kappa = 0.941 and 0.905, respectively). While metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were higher for CR, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, DCAs significantly favored CR (p < 0.05).Conclusion: CR offers a superior visualization of distal femur fractures than VR. It enhances fracture classification accuracy and bolsters diagnostic confidence. The high inter- and intra-observer agreement underscores its reliability, suggesting its potential clinical importance.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1335759/fulldistal femur fractureAO/OTA classificationcinematic renderingvolume renderingdiagnostic confidence
spellingShingle Song Chen
Xiong Wang
Zhenxin Zheng
Zhiqiang Fu
Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
distal femur fracture
AO/OTA classification
cinematic rendering
volume rendering
diagnostic confidence
title Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study
title_full Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study
title_fullStr Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study
title_full_unstemmed Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study
title_short Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study
title_sort cinematic rendering improves the ao ota classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering a retrospective single center study
topic distal femur fracture
AO/OTA classification
cinematic rendering
volume rendering
diagnostic confidence
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1335759/full
work_keys_str_mv AT songchen cinematicrenderingimprovestheaootaclassificationofdistalfemurfracturescomparedtovolumerenderingaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT xiongwang cinematicrenderingimprovestheaootaclassificationofdistalfemurfracturescomparedtovolumerenderingaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT zhenxinzheng cinematicrenderingimprovestheaootaclassificationofdistalfemurfracturescomparedtovolumerenderingaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT zhiqiangfu cinematicrenderingimprovestheaootaclassificationofdistalfemurfracturescomparedtovolumerenderingaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy