Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Improvement Benefits of Biological Retention Facilities Based on AHP-CRITIC

Biological retention facilities are widely used in the construction of new urban infrastructure because of the increasingly serious problems of urban waterlogging and rainwater pollution. At present, a common method to resolve these problems is to improve the treatment performance of these facilitie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui Liang, Meng Wu, Xingli Jia, Qi Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-03-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/3/780
_version_ 1827306772408303616
author Hui Liang
Meng Wu
Xingli Jia
Qi Yang
author_facet Hui Liang
Meng Wu
Xingli Jia
Qi Yang
author_sort Hui Liang
collection DOAJ
description Biological retention facilities are widely used in the construction of new urban infrastructure because of the increasingly serious problems of urban waterlogging and rainwater pollution. At present, a common method to resolve these problems is to improve the treatment performance of these facilities to improve the soil filling layer. How to evaluate the comprehensive benefits of the improved soil filling layer is a problem that cannot be ignored. In this paper, data from seven groups of soil improvement schemes were collected through laboratory tests, and an evaluation method based on AHP-CRITIC was proposed. Firstly, the evaluation indexes of soil improvement in biological retention facilities were determined, and their subjective and objective weights were determined by the AHP method and CRITIC method, respectively, and the comprehensive weights were further calculated. A comprehensive evaluation model was established by the TOPSISI method. Finally, the AHP-CRITIC evaluation model determined that 10% zeolite-amended soil had the best comprehensive evaluation effect, followed by 20% zeolite-amended soil and 10% gravel-amended soil. The results show that the evaluation model can comprehensively assess the benefits of soil improvement in bioretention facilities from the levels of infiltration, purification, and economy and can then select the optimal program for use in actual engineering practice.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:28:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bac7e3ab5db74dbfa8e84895ddfd931d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:28:20Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-bac7e3ab5db74dbfa8e84895ddfd931d2024-03-27T13:29:31ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092024-03-0114378010.3390/buildings14030780Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Improvement Benefits of Biological Retention Facilities Based on AHP-CRITICHui Liang0Meng Wu1Xingli Jia2Qi Yang3Shaanxi Huashan Road and Bridge Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710026, ChinaShaanxi Huashan Road and Bridge Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710026, ChinaSchool of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, ChinaSchool of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, ChinaBiological retention facilities are widely used in the construction of new urban infrastructure because of the increasingly serious problems of urban waterlogging and rainwater pollution. At present, a common method to resolve these problems is to improve the treatment performance of these facilities to improve the soil filling layer. How to evaluate the comprehensive benefits of the improved soil filling layer is a problem that cannot be ignored. In this paper, data from seven groups of soil improvement schemes were collected through laboratory tests, and an evaluation method based on AHP-CRITIC was proposed. Firstly, the evaluation indexes of soil improvement in biological retention facilities were determined, and their subjective and objective weights were determined by the AHP method and CRITIC method, respectively, and the comprehensive weights were further calculated. A comprehensive evaluation model was established by the TOPSISI method. Finally, the AHP-CRITIC evaluation model determined that 10% zeolite-amended soil had the best comprehensive evaluation effect, followed by 20% zeolite-amended soil and 10% gravel-amended soil. The results show that the evaluation model can comprehensively assess the benefits of soil improvement in bioretention facilities from the levels of infiltration, purification, and economy and can then select the optimal program for use in actual engineering practice.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/3/780infrastructure constructionLIDbioretention facilityAHPCRITICcomprehensive evaluation
spellingShingle Hui Liang
Meng Wu
Xingli Jia
Qi Yang
Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Improvement Benefits of Biological Retention Facilities Based on AHP-CRITIC
Buildings
infrastructure construction
LID
bioretention facility
AHP
CRITIC
comprehensive evaluation
title Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Improvement Benefits of Biological Retention Facilities Based on AHP-CRITIC
title_full Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Improvement Benefits of Biological Retention Facilities Based on AHP-CRITIC
title_fullStr Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Improvement Benefits of Biological Retention Facilities Based on AHP-CRITIC
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Improvement Benefits of Biological Retention Facilities Based on AHP-CRITIC
title_short Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Improvement Benefits of Biological Retention Facilities Based on AHP-CRITIC
title_sort comprehensive evaluation of soil improvement benefits of biological retention facilities based on ahp critic
topic infrastructure construction
LID
bioretention facility
AHP
CRITIC
comprehensive evaluation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/3/780
work_keys_str_mv AT huiliang comprehensiveevaluationofsoilimprovementbenefitsofbiologicalretentionfacilitiesbasedonahpcritic
AT mengwu comprehensiveevaluationofsoilimprovementbenefitsofbiologicalretentionfacilitiesbasedonahpcritic
AT xinglijia comprehensiveevaluationofsoilimprovementbenefitsofbiologicalretentionfacilitiesbasedonahpcritic
AT qiyang comprehensiveevaluationofsoilimprovementbenefitsofbiologicalretentionfacilitiesbasedonahpcritic