Pragmatisms and Logical Empiricisms: Response to Misak and Klein

This paper responds to the generous comments by Alexander Klein and Cheryl Misak on my “American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: The Early Years”. First, besides offering some clarification of my original thesis, I argue that Jerusalem was not liable to the anti-Spencerian criticisms by James that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Uebel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MULPress 2016-06-01
Series:Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
Online Access:https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/2947
_version_ 1811284505438191616
author Thomas Uebel
author_facet Thomas Uebel
author_sort Thomas Uebel
collection DOAJ
description This paper responds to the generous comments by Alexander Klein and Cheryl Misak on my “American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: The Early Years”. First, besides offering some clarification of my original thesis, I argue that Jerusalem was not liable to the anti-Spencerian criticisms by James that Klein adduces in the course of defending James against the charge of psychologism. Then I investigate the impact of Wittgenstein’s Ramsey-derived pragmatism, importantly foregrounded by Misak, on the Vienna Circle and argue that it was mainly limited to Schlick but not recognized as pragmatist, also leaving unaffected the impact of James’s pragmatism on Frank, Hahn and Neurath specified in my original paper. That said, Klein’s and Misak’s comments add significantly to our understanding of long-neglected transatlantic philosophical connections in the early twentieth century.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:30:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-baf592aa735a470da1469cf5f96268bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2159-0303
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:30:40Z
publishDate 2016-06-01
publisher MULPress
record_format Article
series Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
spelling doaj.art-baf592aa735a470da1469cf5f96268bf2022-12-22T03:06:37ZengMULPressJournal for the History of Analytical Philosophy2159-03032016-06-014510.15173/jhap.v4i5.2947Pragmatisms and Logical Empiricisms: Response to Misak and KleinThomas Uebel0University of ManchesterThis paper responds to the generous comments by Alexander Klein and Cheryl Misak on my “American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: The Early Years”. First, besides offering some clarification of my original thesis, I argue that Jerusalem was not liable to the anti-Spencerian criticisms by James that Klein adduces in the course of defending James against the charge of psychologism. Then I investigate the impact of Wittgenstein’s Ramsey-derived pragmatism, importantly foregrounded by Misak, on the Vienna Circle and argue that it was mainly limited to Schlick but not recognized as pragmatist, also leaving unaffected the impact of James’s pragmatism on Frank, Hahn and Neurath specified in my original paper. That said, Klein’s and Misak’s comments add significantly to our understanding of long-neglected transatlantic philosophical connections in the early twentieth century.https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/2947
spellingShingle Thomas Uebel
Pragmatisms and Logical Empiricisms: Response to Misak and Klein
Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
title Pragmatisms and Logical Empiricisms: Response to Misak and Klein
title_full Pragmatisms and Logical Empiricisms: Response to Misak and Klein
title_fullStr Pragmatisms and Logical Empiricisms: Response to Misak and Klein
title_full_unstemmed Pragmatisms and Logical Empiricisms: Response to Misak and Klein
title_short Pragmatisms and Logical Empiricisms: Response to Misak and Klein
title_sort pragmatisms and logical empiricisms response to misak and klein
url https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/2947
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasuebel pragmatismsandlogicalempiricismsresponsetomisakandklein