MORPHOLOGIC CHANGES AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WIDE AAA NECKS TREATED WITH 34-36MM PROXIMAL DIAMETER EVAR DEVICES

Introduction: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) became the preferred modality for infrarenal aneurysm (AAA) repair. Several available endografts have main body proximal diameters up to 36mm, allowing for treatment of proximal AAA necks up to 32 mm. However, large neck represents a predictor of pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José Oliveira-Pinto, Rita Soares Ferreira, Nélson F. G. Oliveira, Frederico Bastos Gonçalves, Sanne Hoeks, Marie Josee Van Rijn, Sander Ten Raa, Armando Mansilha, Hence Verhagen
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular 2020-08-01
Series:Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/297
_version_ 1797951955380731904
author José Oliveira-Pinto
Rita Soares Ferreira
Nélson F. G. Oliveira
Frederico Bastos Gonçalves
Sanne Hoeks
Marie Josee Van Rijn
Sander Ten Raa
Armando Mansilha
Hence Verhagen
author_facet José Oliveira-Pinto
Rita Soares Ferreira
Nélson F. G. Oliveira
Frederico Bastos Gonçalves
Sanne Hoeks
Marie Josee Van Rijn
Sander Ten Raa
Armando Mansilha
Hence Verhagen
author_sort José Oliveira-Pinto
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) became the preferred modality for infrarenal aneurysm (AAA) repair. Several available endografts have main body proximal diameters up to 36mm, allowing for treatment of proximal AAA necks up to 32 mm. However, large neck represents a predictor of proximal complications after EVAR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term outcomes of patients requiring 34-36mm main body devices. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database including all patients undergoing elective EVAR for degenerative AAA in a single tertiary referral hospital in The Netherlands were eligible. All measurements were performed on center-lumen line reconstructions obtained on dedicated software. Patients were classified as large diameter (LD) if the implanted device was >32mm wide. The remaining patients were classified as normal diameter (ND). Primary endpoint was neck-related events (a composite of “endoleak” (EL) 1A, neck-related secondary intervention or migration >5mm). Neck morphology changes and survival were also assessed. Differences in groups were adjusted by multivariable analysis. Results: The study included 502 patients (90 in the LD group; 412 in the ND group). Median follow-up was 3.5 years (1.5–6.2) and 4.5 years (2.1–7.3) for the LD and ND groups, respectively (P = .008). Regarding baseline characteristics, hypertension (83% vs 69.7%, P=.012) and smoking (86% vs 74.1%, P=.018) were more frequent in the LD group. Patients in the LD group had wider (Proximal neck Ø > 28 mm: 75% vs 3.3%, P<.001), more angulated (α-angle>45º: 21% vs 9%, P=.002), more conical (39.8% vs 20.3%, P<.001) and a thrombus-laden neck (Neck thrombus >25%: 42% vs 32.3%, P<.089). Oversizing was greater among LD group (20% [12.5–28.8] vs 16.7% [12–21.7], P=.008). All other anatomical risk factors were similar between groups. The 5-year freedom from neck-related event was 73% for the LD group and 85% for the ND group, P=.001. Type 1A endoleaks were more common in the LD group (12.2% vs 5.1%, P=.003). Migration > 5mm occurred similarly in both groups (7.8% vs 5.1%, P=.32). Neck-related secondary interventions were also more common among LD patients (13.3% vs 8.7%; P = .027). On multivariable regression analysis, LD group was an independent risk factor for neck-related adverse events (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–3.83, P=0.002). Neck dilatation was greater among LD patients (median, 3 mm [IQR, 0–6] vs 2mm [IQR, 0–4]; P =.034) On multivariable analysis, LD was an independent predictor for neck dilatation > 10 % (HR: 1.61 CI 95% 1.08–2.39, P=.020). Survival at 5-years was 66.1% for LD and 71.2% for SD groups, P=.14. Conclusion: Standard EVAR in patients with large infrarenal necks requiring a 34- to 36-mm proximal endograft is independently associated to increased rate of neck related events and more neck dilatation. This subgroup of patients could be considered for more proximal seal strategies with fenestrated or branched devices, if unfit for open repair. Tighter surveillance following EVAR in these patients in the long term is also advised.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:38:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb03fe6c9a714765a40410d3015f1aa1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1646-706X
2183-0096
language Portuguese
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:38:44Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
record_format Article
series Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
spelling doaj.art-bb03fe6c9a714765a40410d3015f1aa12023-01-16T09:07:35ZporSociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia VascularAngiologia e Cirurgia Vascular1646-706X2183-00962020-08-0116210.48750/acv.297MORPHOLOGIC CHANGES AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WIDE AAA NECKS TREATED WITH 34-36MM PROXIMAL DIAMETER EVAR DEVICESJosé Oliveira-Pinto0Rita Soares Ferreira1Nélson F. G. Oliveira2Frederico Bastos Gonçalves3Sanne Hoeks4Marie Josee Van Rijn5Sander Ten Raa6Armando Mansilha7Hence Verhagen8Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Oporto, Porto, Portugal. Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, PortugalDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, Azores, PortugalDepartment of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, PortugalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Oporto, Porto, PortugalDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Introduction: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) became the preferred modality for infrarenal aneurysm (AAA) repair. Several available endografts have main body proximal diameters up to 36mm, allowing for treatment of proximal AAA necks up to 32 mm. However, large neck represents a predictor of proximal complications after EVAR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term outcomes of patients requiring 34-36mm main body devices. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database including all patients undergoing elective EVAR for degenerative AAA in a single tertiary referral hospital in The Netherlands were eligible. All measurements were performed on center-lumen line reconstructions obtained on dedicated software. Patients were classified as large diameter (LD) if the implanted device was >32mm wide. The remaining patients were classified as normal diameter (ND). Primary endpoint was neck-related events (a composite of “endoleak” (EL) 1A, neck-related secondary intervention or migration >5mm). Neck morphology changes and survival were also assessed. Differences in groups were adjusted by multivariable analysis. Results: The study included 502 patients (90 in the LD group; 412 in the ND group). Median follow-up was 3.5 years (1.5–6.2) and 4.5 years (2.1–7.3) for the LD and ND groups, respectively (P = .008). Regarding baseline characteristics, hypertension (83% vs 69.7%, P=.012) and smoking (86% vs 74.1%, P=.018) were more frequent in the LD group. Patients in the LD group had wider (Proximal neck Ø > 28 mm: 75% vs 3.3%, P<.001), more angulated (α-angle>45º: 21% vs 9%, P=.002), more conical (39.8% vs 20.3%, P<.001) and a thrombus-laden neck (Neck thrombus >25%: 42% vs 32.3%, P<.089). Oversizing was greater among LD group (20% [12.5–28.8] vs 16.7% [12–21.7], P=.008). All other anatomical risk factors were similar between groups. The 5-year freedom from neck-related event was 73% for the LD group and 85% for the ND group, P=.001. Type 1A endoleaks were more common in the LD group (12.2% vs 5.1%, P=.003). Migration > 5mm occurred similarly in both groups (7.8% vs 5.1%, P=.32). Neck-related secondary interventions were also more common among LD patients (13.3% vs 8.7%; P = .027). On multivariable regression analysis, LD group was an independent risk factor for neck-related adverse events (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–3.83, P=0.002). Neck dilatation was greater among LD patients (median, 3 mm [IQR, 0–6] vs 2mm [IQR, 0–4]; P =.034) On multivariable analysis, LD was an independent predictor for neck dilatation > 10 % (HR: 1.61 CI 95% 1.08–2.39, P=.020). Survival at 5-years was 66.1% for LD and 71.2% for SD groups, P=.14. Conclusion: Standard EVAR in patients with large infrarenal necks requiring a 34- to 36-mm proximal endograft is independently associated to increased rate of neck related events and more neck dilatation. This subgroup of patients could be considered for more proximal seal strategies with fenestrated or branched devices, if unfit for open repair. Tighter surveillance following EVAR in these patients in the long term is also advised. https://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/297Aortic aneurysmAbdominal (MeSH)AneurysmAortic neckNeck DiameterNeck-related events
spellingShingle José Oliveira-Pinto
Rita Soares Ferreira
Nélson F. G. Oliveira
Frederico Bastos Gonçalves
Sanne Hoeks
Marie Josee Van Rijn
Sander Ten Raa
Armando Mansilha
Hence Verhagen
MORPHOLOGIC CHANGES AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WIDE AAA NECKS TREATED WITH 34-36MM PROXIMAL DIAMETER EVAR DEVICES
Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
Aortic aneurysm
Abdominal (MeSH)
Aneurysm
Aortic neck
Neck Diameter
Neck-related events
title MORPHOLOGIC CHANGES AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WIDE AAA NECKS TREATED WITH 34-36MM PROXIMAL DIAMETER EVAR DEVICES
title_full MORPHOLOGIC CHANGES AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WIDE AAA NECKS TREATED WITH 34-36MM PROXIMAL DIAMETER EVAR DEVICES
title_fullStr MORPHOLOGIC CHANGES AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WIDE AAA NECKS TREATED WITH 34-36MM PROXIMAL DIAMETER EVAR DEVICES
title_full_unstemmed MORPHOLOGIC CHANGES AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WIDE AAA NECKS TREATED WITH 34-36MM PROXIMAL DIAMETER EVAR DEVICES
title_short MORPHOLOGIC CHANGES AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WIDE AAA NECKS TREATED WITH 34-36MM PROXIMAL DIAMETER EVAR DEVICES
title_sort morphologic changes and clinical consequences of wide aaa necks treated with 34 36mm proximal diameter evar devices
topic Aortic aneurysm
Abdominal (MeSH)
Aneurysm
Aortic neck
Neck Diameter
Neck-related events
url https://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/297
work_keys_str_mv AT joseoliveirapinto morphologicchangesandclinicalconsequencesofwideaaaneckstreatedwith3436mmproximaldiameterevardevices
AT ritasoaresferreira morphologicchangesandclinicalconsequencesofwideaaaneckstreatedwith3436mmproximaldiameterevardevices
AT nelsonfgoliveira morphologicchangesandclinicalconsequencesofwideaaaneckstreatedwith3436mmproximaldiameterevardevices
AT fredericobastosgoncalves morphologicchangesandclinicalconsequencesofwideaaaneckstreatedwith3436mmproximaldiameterevardevices
AT sannehoeks morphologicchangesandclinicalconsequencesofwideaaaneckstreatedwith3436mmproximaldiameterevardevices
AT mariejoseevanrijn morphologicchangesandclinicalconsequencesofwideaaaneckstreatedwith3436mmproximaldiameterevardevices
AT sandertenraa morphologicchangesandclinicalconsequencesofwideaaaneckstreatedwith3436mmproximaldiameterevardevices
AT armandomansilha morphologicchangesandclinicalconsequencesofwideaaaneckstreatedwith3436mmproximaldiameterevardevices
AT henceverhagen morphologicchangesandclinicalconsequencesofwideaaaneckstreatedwith3436mmproximaldiameterevardevices