Comparison of enthalpy-porosity and lattice Boltzmann-phase field techniques for the simulation of the heat transfer and melting processes in LHTES devices

Thermal energy torage (TES) is a key enabling technology for the efficient exploitation of distributed generation systems based on renewable energy sources. Among the available options, research on latent heat TES (LHTES) solutions has been particularly active in the last decade, due to their abilit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krastev Vesselin Krassimirov, Falcucci Giacomo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/88/e3sconf_ati2021_01002.pdf
_version_ 1818933378876964864
author Krastev Vesselin Krassimirov
Falcucci Giacomo
author_facet Krastev Vesselin Krassimirov
Falcucci Giacomo
author_sort Krastev Vesselin Krassimirov
collection DOAJ
description Thermal energy torage (TES) is a key enabling technology for the efficient exploitation of distributed generation systems based on renewable energy sources. Among the available options, research on latent heat TES (LHTES) solutions has been particularly active in the last decade, due to their ability to store and release high amounts of thermal energy in a very narrow temperature range. LHTES devices are based on phase change materials (PCMs), which act as thermal sinks or sources during their solid-to-liquid transition and vice-versa. As such, the development of reliable numerical tools for the prediction of the heat transfer and phase change characteristics of PCMs is of foremost importance, to help designing innovative and efficiently integrated LHTES implementations. In the present paper, the consolidated enthalpy-porosity (EP) method is compared to a novel lattice Boltzmann-phase field (LB-PF) algorithm in the simulation of a standard numerical benchmark for paraffin-like PCM melting problems. Performances and limitations of the two approaches are discussed, including the influence of model-related and purely numerical parameters. Outcomes from this study are used to confirm general guidelines for the application of well established methodologies, as well as to suggest new pathways for out-of-standard modeling techniques.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T04:47:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb06c20e2d174a098519ba3dde793b42
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T04:47:26Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-bb06c20e2d174a098519ba3dde793b422022-12-21T19:52:57ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422021-01-013120100210.1051/e3sconf/202131201002e3sconf_ati2021_01002Comparison of enthalpy-porosity and lattice Boltzmann-phase field techniques for the simulation of the heat transfer and melting processes in LHTES devicesKrastev Vesselin Krassimirov0Falcucci Giacomo1Department of Enterprise Engineering “Mario Lucertini”, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”Department of Enterprise Engineering “Mario Lucertini”, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”Thermal energy torage (TES) is a key enabling technology for the efficient exploitation of distributed generation systems based on renewable energy sources. Among the available options, research on latent heat TES (LHTES) solutions has been particularly active in the last decade, due to their ability to store and release high amounts of thermal energy in a very narrow temperature range. LHTES devices are based on phase change materials (PCMs), which act as thermal sinks or sources during their solid-to-liquid transition and vice-versa. As such, the development of reliable numerical tools for the prediction of the heat transfer and phase change characteristics of PCMs is of foremost importance, to help designing innovative and efficiently integrated LHTES implementations. In the present paper, the consolidated enthalpy-porosity (EP) method is compared to a novel lattice Boltzmann-phase field (LB-PF) algorithm in the simulation of a standard numerical benchmark for paraffin-like PCM melting problems. Performances and limitations of the two approaches are discussed, including the influence of model-related and purely numerical parameters. Outcomes from this study are used to confirm general guidelines for the application of well established methodologies, as well as to suggest new pathways for out-of-standard modeling techniques.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/88/e3sconf_ati2021_01002.pdf
spellingShingle Krastev Vesselin Krassimirov
Falcucci Giacomo
Comparison of enthalpy-porosity and lattice Boltzmann-phase field techniques for the simulation of the heat transfer and melting processes in LHTES devices
E3S Web of Conferences
title Comparison of enthalpy-porosity and lattice Boltzmann-phase field techniques for the simulation of the heat transfer and melting processes in LHTES devices
title_full Comparison of enthalpy-porosity and lattice Boltzmann-phase field techniques for the simulation of the heat transfer and melting processes in LHTES devices
title_fullStr Comparison of enthalpy-porosity and lattice Boltzmann-phase field techniques for the simulation of the heat transfer and melting processes in LHTES devices
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of enthalpy-porosity and lattice Boltzmann-phase field techniques for the simulation of the heat transfer and melting processes in LHTES devices
title_short Comparison of enthalpy-porosity and lattice Boltzmann-phase field techniques for the simulation of the heat transfer and melting processes in LHTES devices
title_sort comparison of enthalpy porosity and lattice boltzmann phase field techniques for the simulation of the heat transfer and melting processes in lhtes devices
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/88/e3sconf_ati2021_01002.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT krastevvesselinkrassimirov comparisonofenthalpyporosityandlatticeboltzmannphasefieldtechniquesforthesimulationoftheheattransferandmeltingprocessesinlhtesdevices
AT falcuccigiacomo comparisonofenthalpyporosityandlatticeboltzmannphasefieldtechniquesforthesimulationoftheheattransferandmeltingprocessesinlhtesdevices