Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory

State rumination, unlike trait rumination which is described as a persistent and stable response style, is usually triggered by a specific stressful event and causes negative emotions within a short period of time. The measurement methods of trait rumination, such as the ruminative response scale (R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chanyu Wang, Xiaoqi Song, Tatia M. C. Lee, Ruibin Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.824744/full
_version_ 1831573048929550336
author Chanyu Wang
Xiaoqi Song
Tatia M. C. Lee
Tatia M. C. Lee
Ruibin Zhang
Ruibin Zhang
author_facet Chanyu Wang
Xiaoqi Song
Tatia M. C. Lee
Tatia M. C. Lee
Ruibin Zhang
Ruibin Zhang
author_sort Chanyu Wang
collection DOAJ
description State rumination, unlike trait rumination which is described as a persistent and stable response style, is usually triggered by a specific stressful event and causes negative emotions within a short period of time. The measurement methods of trait rumination, such as the ruminative response scale (RRS), are therefore not fully applicable to state rumination. Recently, researchers have developed the brief state rumination inventory (BSRI) to characterize state rumination, addressing the gap in the field of accurate measurement of state rumination. To develop such an effective tool in the Chinese context, we developed a Chinese version of the BSRI and tested its psychometric properties. Two studies were conducted to address the research goal. In Study 1, we recruited 512 subjects, each of whom completed the Chinese version of the BSRI, RRS, emotional regulation questionnaire (ERQ), depression–anxiety–stress scale (DASS), and positive and negative affect scale (PANAS). Results showed that the scores of the BSRI were positively correlated with all other scale scores (ps < 0.001), and the correlation with the RRS was the highest, indicating that the BSRI showed good convergent validity. Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the Chinese version of the BSRI was 0.93. Study 2 aimed to examine the ecological validity of the Chinese version of the BSRI. We recruited another 54 subjects who were randomly divided into two groups, with 27 in the rumination induction group and 27 in the distraction group, and recorded the BSRI scores of the two groups before and after a specific experiment. We found there was a significant increase in BSRI scores after rumination induction (t = 3.91, p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in the concrete distraction group before and after the experiment (t = 0.70, p = 0.48). In sum, the Chinese version of the BSRI showed good reliability and validity for assessing state rumination in the general Chinese population.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T13:38:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb111e7a293a423daa35271d6e74ecf1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2565
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T13:38:33Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj.art-bb111e7a293a423daa35271d6e74ecf12022-12-21T21:46:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652022-03-011010.3389/fpubh.2022.824744824744Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination InventoryChanyu Wang0Xiaoqi Song1Tatia M. C. Lee2Tatia M. C. Lee3Ruibin Zhang4Ruibin Zhang5Laboratory of Cognitive Control and Brain Healthy, Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, ChinaLaboratory of Cognitive Control and Brain Healthy, Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaLaboratory of Neuropsychology and Human Neuroscience, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaLaboratory of Cognitive Control and Brain Healthy, Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Psychiatry, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, ChinaState rumination, unlike trait rumination which is described as a persistent and stable response style, is usually triggered by a specific stressful event and causes negative emotions within a short period of time. The measurement methods of trait rumination, such as the ruminative response scale (RRS), are therefore not fully applicable to state rumination. Recently, researchers have developed the brief state rumination inventory (BSRI) to characterize state rumination, addressing the gap in the field of accurate measurement of state rumination. To develop such an effective tool in the Chinese context, we developed a Chinese version of the BSRI and tested its psychometric properties. Two studies were conducted to address the research goal. In Study 1, we recruited 512 subjects, each of whom completed the Chinese version of the BSRI, RRS, emotional regulation questionnaire (ERQ), depression–anxiety–stress scale (DASS), and positive and negative affect scale (PANAS). Results showed that the scores of the BSRI were positively correlated with all other scale scores (ps < 0.001), and the correlation with the RRS was the highest, indicating that the BSRI showed good convergent validity. Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the Chinese version of the BSRI was 0.93. Study 2 aimed to examine the ecological validity of the Chinese version of the BSRI. We recruited another 54 subjects who were randomly divided into two groups, with 27 in the rumination induction group and 27 in the distraction group, and recorded the BSRI scores of the two groups before and after a specific experiment. We found there was a significant increase in BSRI scores after rumination induction (t = 3.91, p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in the concrete distraction group before and after the experiment (t = 0.70, p = 0.48). In sum, the Chinese version of the BSRI showed good reliability and validity for assessing state rumination in the general Chinese population.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.824744/fullstate ruminationtrait-like ruminationreliabilityvalidityChinese
spellingShingle Chanyu Wang
Xiaoqi Song
Tatia M. C. Lee
Tatia M. C. Lee
Ruibin Zhang
Ruibin Zhang
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory
Frontiers in Public Health
state rumination
trait-like rumination
reliability
validity
Chinese
title Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory
title_full Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory
title_fullStr Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory
title_short Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory
title_sort psychometric properties of the chinese version of the brief state rumination inventory
topic state rumination
trait-like rumination
reliability
validity
Chinese
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.824744/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chanyuwang psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionofthebriefstateruminationinventory
AT xiaoqisong psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionofthebriefstateruminationinventory
AT tatiamclee psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionofthebriefstateruminationinventory
AT tatiamclee psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionofthebriefstateruminationinventory
AT ruibinzhang psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionofthebriefstateruminationinventory
AT ruibinzhang psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionofthebriefstateruminationinventory