The Role of Government in a Partial Transition from Public to Private in the Expanding Australian Protected Area System
Since the 1980s in democratic societies, neoliberal reforms and neofeudal governance have transferred the delivery of many public goods and services from governments to non-government actors. Privatisation is a core neoliberal agenda, but little is known of the nature and extent of its application t...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Conservation & Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2022;volume=20;issue=3;spage=201;epage=210;aulast=Kirkpatrick |
| _version_ | 1811313256554299392 |
|---|---|
| author | Jamie B Kirkpatrick Julie Fielder Aidan Davison Lilian M Pearce Benjamin Cooke |
| author_facet | Jamie B Kirkpatrick Julie Fielder Aidan Davison Lilian M Pearce Benjamin Cooke |
| author_sort | Jamie B Kirkpatrick |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Since the 1980s in democratic societies, neoliberal reforms and neofeudal governance have transferred the delivery of many public goods and services from governments to non-government actors. Privatisation is a core neoliberal agenda, but little is known of the nature and extent of its application to nature conservation through reservation. We investigate the degree of privatisation of the expanding protected area system in our case study areas of Australia and Tasmania, hypothesising that governments have: disrupted public agencies managing the protected area estate by repeated reorganisation; diverted public funds from public to private protected areas; and increasingly alienated public reserves for subsidised private profit from tourism. We found frequent restructuring of agencies managing protected areas. Although Federal Government expenditure on private reserves increased markedly in the twenty-first century, so did expenditure on public conservation reserves. All States except Queensland increased public protected area funding. Direct subsidisation of private reserves by government has not had a steady upward trajectory. In contrast, subsidisation of private alienation of public conservation reserves for tourism may have accelerated in the twenty-first century. We conclude that, while Australian governments see value in protected areas as a source of economic development and electoral advantage, they are agnostic on ownership. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T10:50:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bb1afd1897a3469f8996ef2612965705 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0972-4923 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T10:50:30Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Conservation & Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-bb1afd1897a3469f8996ef26129657052022-12-22T02:49:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsConservation & Society0972-49232022-01-0120320121010.4103/cs.cs_100_21The Role of Government in a Partial Transition from Public to Private in the Expanding Australian Protected Area SystemJamie B KirkpatrickJulie FielderAidan DavisonLilian M PearceBenjamin CookeSince the 1980s in democratic societies, neoliberal reforms and neofeudal governance have transferred the delivery of many public goods and services from governments to non-government actors. Privatisation is a core neoliberal agenda, but little is known of the nature and extent of its application to nature conservation through reservation. We investigate the degree of privatisation of the expanding protected area system in our case study areas of Australia and Tasmania, hypothesising that governments have: disrupted public agencies managing the protected area estate by repeated reorganisation; diverted public funds from public to private protected areas; and increasingly alienated public reserves for subsidised private profit from tourism. We found frequent restructuring of agencies managing protected areas. Although Federal Government expenditure on private reserves increased markedly in the twenty-first century, so did expenditure on public conservation reserves. All States except Queensland increased public protected area funding. Direct subsidisation of private reserves by government has not had a steady upward trajectory. In contrast, subsidisation of private alienation of public conservation reserves for tourism may have accelerated in the twenty-first century. We conclude that, while Australian governments see value in protected areas as a source of economic development and electoral advantage, they are agnostic on ownership.http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2022;volume=20;issue=3;spage=201;epage=210;aulast=Kirkpatrickenvironmental policy and governancenature conservation fundingneoliberal conservationprivate protected areaspublic protected areas |
| spellingShingle | Jamie B Kirkpatrick Julie Fielder Aidan Davison Lilian M Pearce Benjamin Cooke The Role of Government in a Partial Transition from Public to Private in the Expanding Australian Protected Area System Conservation & Society environmental policy and governance nature conservation funding neoliberal conservation private protected areas public protected areas |
| title | The Role of Government in a Partial Transition from Public to Private in the Expanding Australian Protected Area System |
| title_full | The Role of Government in a Partial Transition from Public to Private in the Expanding Australian Protected Area System |
| title_fullStr | The Role of Government in a Partial Transition from Public to Private in the Expanding Australian Protected Area System |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Government in a Partial Transition from Public to Private in the Expanding Australian Protected Area System |
| title_short | The Role of Government in a Partial Transition from Public to Private in the Expanding Australian Protected Area System |
| title_sort | role of government in a partial transition from public to private in the expanding australian protected area system |
| topic | environmental policy and governance nature conservation funding neoliberal conservation private protected areas public protected areas |
| url | http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2022;volume=20;issue=3;spage=201;epage=210;aulast=Kirkpatrick |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jamiebkirkpatrick theroleofgovernmentinapartialtransitionfrompublictoprivateintheexpandingaustralianprotectedareasystem AT juliefielder theroleofgovernmentinapartialtransitionfrompublictoprivateintheexpandingaustralianprotectedareasystem AT aidandavison theroleofgovernmentinapartialtransitionfrompublictoprivateintheexpandingaustralianprotectedareasystem AT lilianmpearce theroleofgovernmentinapartialtransitionfrompublictoprivateintheexpandingaustralianprotectedareasystem AT benjamincooke theroleofgovernmentinapartialtransitionfrompublictoprivateintheexpandingaustralianprotectedareasystem AT jamiebkirkpatrick roleofgovernmentinapartialtransitionfrompublictoprivateintheexpandingaustralianprotectedareasystem AT juliefielder roleofgovernmentinapartialtransitionfrompublictoprivateintheexpandingaustralianprotectedareasystem AT aidandavison roleofgovernmentinapartialtransitionfrompublictoprivateintheexpandingaustralianprotectedareasystem AT lilianmpearce roleofgovernmentinapartialtransitionfrompublictoprivateintheexpandingaustralianprotectedareasystem AT benjamincooke roleofgovernmentinapartialtransitionfrompublictoprivateintheexpandingaustralianprotectedareasystem |